PDF

Theranostics 2021; 11(7):3262-3277. doi:10.7150/thno.54023 This issue Cite

Review

Semaphorins as emerging clinical biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cancer

Roberta Mastrantonio¹, Hua You² , Luca Tamagnone^1,3

1. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
2. Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, China.
3. Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli”, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

✉ Corresponding authors: luca.tamagnoneit; youhua307com.

Abstract

Semaphorins are a large family of developmental regulatory signals, characterized by aberrant expression in human cancers. These molecules crucially control cell-cell communication, cell migration, invasion and metastasis, tumor angiogenesis, inflammatory and anti-cancer immune responses. Semaphorins comprise secreted and cell surface-exposed molecules and their receptors are mainly found in the Plexin and Neuropilin families, which are further implicated in a signaling network controlling the tumor microenvironment. Accumulating evidence indicates that semaphorins may be considered as novel clinical biomarkers for cancer, especially for the prediction of patient survival and responsiveness to therapy. Moreover, preclinical experimental studies have demonstrated that targeting semaphorin signaling can interfere with tumor growth and/or metastatic dissemination, suggesting their relevance as novel therapeutic targets in cancer; this has also prompted the development of semaphorin-interfering molecules for application in the clinic. Here we will survey, in diverse human cancers, the current knowledge about the relevance of semaphorin family members, and conceptualize potential lines of future research development in this field.

Keywords: prognostic biomarkers, predictive biomarkers, therapy, cancer, semaphorin, plexin, neuropilin

Introduction

Semaphorins were initially identified for their function as short-range axonal guidance molecules during neuronal development, but actually they are involved in the regulation of a wide spectrum of developmental processes and human diseases [1]. Semaphorins are a family of cell surface exposed and soluble proteins conserved from invertebrates to humans. In vertebrates, 20 semaphorin genes have been identified, which are divided into five classes based on sequence and structure similarities [2]. The structural hallmark of all semaphorins is an N'‑terminal 500 amino acid long sema domain, assuming a seven-blade β‑propeller shape. The sema domain is tightly coupled to an adjacent small cysteine-rich domain, called the PSI (plexin-semaphorin-integrin) domain. Beyond the sema and PSI domains, in the extracellular moiety of many semaphorins are found immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domains or thrombospondin type 1 repeats. The main semaphorin receptors belong to the plexin gene family, which includes nine members divided into four subgroups [3]. Most secreted class 3 semaphorins, however, are unable to interact with plexins directly, but instead bind to receptor complexes including plexin-associated co-receptors of the neuropilin family (NRP1 and NRP2).

Notably, semaphorins can signal in autocrine, paracrine, and juxtacrine manner. Transmembrane semaphorins are also capable of bi-directional signaling, acting both forward through plexins, and in reverse mode via their own cytoplasmic domains. In addition to their interaction in trans, whereby a semaphorin exposed on the cell surface can bind to receptors expressed on adjacent cells, certain transmembrane semaphorins were also found to associate in cis with plexins on the surface of the same cell [4]. Intracellular semaphorin signaling is only partly understood. It can control cell-substrate adhesion and cytoskeletal dynamics through monomeric GTPases, as well as impact cell viability and growth via phosphorylation cascades, just to name two examples. Moreover, recent evidence indicates the relevance of semaphorin signals in the regulation of phenotypic plasticity and cell stemness, implicating an impact on gene transcription [5].

Semaphorins have emerged as crucial regulators of tumor growth and metastasis; in particular, they can control cancer development and progression by acting on the cross-talk between different cell types in the tumor microenvironment [6,7]. Taking into account this scenario, it is not surprising to find a continuously growing number of studies supporting the identification of semaphorins as cancer biomarkers. Moreover, substantial preclinical data have provided evidence featuring semaphorin signals as attractive therapeutic targets in cancer, and the first clinical studies with anti-semaphorin drugs are emerging. Notably, the state-of-the-art in this field indicates a notable heterogeneity in the relevance and activities of individual semaphorins in diverse tumor types. Thus, in this article, we will also systematically review the literature implicating any semaphorin family members in specific human cancers.

Semaphorins as clinical biomarkers in human cancers

Breast Cancer. Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, and one of the three most common cancers worldwide. It consists of at least four different clinically relevant molecular subtypes: luminal A or B, expressing hormonal receptors for estrogen (ER) and/or progesterone (PR); HER2 oncogene-overexpressing; and triple negative/basal like (HER2 negative and ER/PR negative). Multiple semaphorins have been implicated in breast cancer (also see Table 1).

An elevated expression of the secreted semaphorin Sema3B in breast cancer samples has been associated with better prognosis. In fact, SEMA3B gene is located in chromosome region 3p21.3, a site of frequent allele loss in the early pathogenesis of lung and breast cancers, consistent with a putative tumor suppressor activity for this semaphorin [8]. Notably, SEMA3B is also a direct target of the transcription factor GATA3, with a fundamental role in maintaining normal mammary gland homeostasis [9]. Sema3B binds NRP1 or NRP2 co-receptors, in complex with Plexins of the A subfamily, PlexinA2 in particular [10]. Sema3B can downregulate phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt activity in cancer cells, inhibit cellular proliferation and tumor growth [8], as well as metastasis [9]. Apart from its relevance as favorable prognostic indicator for breast cancer, Sema3B is also under consideration for innovative therapeutic approaches, although caveats remain based on a previous report suggesting that its tumor suppressing activity may trigger rebound inflammatory and prometastatic effects [11].

High levels of another secreted class 3 semaphorin, Sema3A, have also been found to correlate with better patient prognosis, consistent with its ability to induce PTEN activation, through the receptor NRP1, and negatively control breast tumor growth in mouse preclinical models [12] (see Figure 1A). However the functional role of Sema3A/NRP1 signaling in breast cancer cells appears complex, since it was also found to promote stemness and mammosphere formation via MICAL3-dependent stabilization of the regulatory factor Numb [13]. Additional studies in other tumor models, discussed below in this review, have further underscored the complexity of Sema3A activities in the tumor microenvironment.

It was reported a higher Sema3E expression in breast cancer samples associated with distant metastasis [14]. This is consistent with previous experimental findings which indicated a pro-invasive and pro-metastatic activity of this semaphorin in other tumor models [15] via its specific receptor PlexinD1, although the implicated mechanisms remain controversial. Interestingly, a modified recombinant isoform of Sema3E with inhibitor activity has been successfully applied to suppress angiogenesis and tumor progression in mouse models [16]. The impact of Sema3E on tumor angiogenesis is consistent with its recognized important role in the regulation of heart and vessels development [17].

In general, several semaphorins have been implicated to control cancer progression by impinging on stromal and inflammatory cells present in the tumor microenvironment, beyond cancer cells (Figure 2). A detailed discussion of the known mechanisms of semaphorin-dependent regulation of angiogenesis and immune response can be found in other review articles (e.g. [3,18-22]).

 Figure 1 

Semaphorin signaling in cancer cells. Schematic representation of best known signaling mechanisms mediated in cancer cells by prototypic family members Sema3A (panel A) and Sema4D (panel B) (for a review see [7]). The intracellular domain of the plexins deploys GAP activity for Rap1 and R-Ras monomeric GTPases. RTK indicates receptor tyrosine kinases associated with neuropilins and plexins. A few validated molecular tools interfering with these cascades are also indicated (in painted boxes).

Elevated levels of the transmembrane semaphorin Sema4C have been correlated with poor outcome of breast cancer. For instance, it was demonstrated that Sema4C forward signaling (via its receptor PlexinB2) is specifically required for breast cancer cell growth [23]. In fact, targeting Sema4C/PlexinB2 signaling resulted in cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase, upregulation of tumor-suppressor genes and cell senescence. The underlying mechanism involves the activity of a plexin-associated RhoA exchanger protein, LARG, which maintains elevated RhoA-GTP levels in the cells. Moreover, an elevated Sema4C expression in luminal-type ER+ breast tumor cells was associated with a major phenotypic and behavioral switch, including reduced sensitivity to hormonal therapy and the acquisition of invasive/metastatic properties [23]. Notably, increased Sema4C expression in breast cancer cells has also been associated with resistance to paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, while knocking-down its expression could partly recover drug sensitivity [24].

Indeed, metastasis formation is the most important pitfall for breast cancer patients, which otherwise can be cured in a large proportion. Notably, Sema4C was also found to induce ID1 and ID3 transcriptional regulators in triple-negative breast cancer cells, through the enhancement of TGFbeta/BMP signaling; this pathway has been previously implicated in the partial EMT reversion phenotype observed in late stages of the metastatic process [25], which further identifies Sema4C as a relevant driver of breast cancer metastatic progression.

Tumor-associated lymphatic vessels can play a major role in breast cancer metastasis, and it was shown that cancer cell dissemination by this route may be promoted by Sema4C expression in lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) [26]. A subsequent study revealed that Sema4C also fosters cytokine-dependent macrophage recruitment in the TME [27]. Notably, soluble Sema4C can be released from the cell surface due to proteolytic cleavage by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and it was proposed as promising serum marker for the early diagnosis and the assessment of metastasis risk in breast cancer [26]. Interestingly, two clinical trials aimed at the assessment of these hypotheses have been planned (NCT03663153; NCT03662633).

Another semaphorin consistently implicated in breast cancer development is Sema7A. In normal breast tissue Sema7A is almost absent, while its expression increases in breast tumor samples, and it is associated with decreased overall patient survival [28]. In fact, Sema7A is considered a tumor promoter, impinging on tumor growth, invasiveness, EMT and metastases, probably by signaling via integrin-β1 receptor [29]. Additionally, tumor derived Sema7A can hijack the breast tumor microenvironment by increasing the recruitment of macrophages with pro-angiogenic activity and the growth of tumor-associated lymphatic vessels [28]. Recent studies revealed a tumor-promoting role of Sema7A during postpartum mammary gland involution [30,31]. Intriguingly, the tissue microenvironment created during this physiological process has proven to be tumor promoting. Actually, Sema7A is highly expressed by mammary epithelial cells during involution; and the study of Sema7A-deficient preclinical mouse models revealed that this semaphorin is crucial to elicit the recruitment of circulating macrophages in the microenvironment, promoting lymphangiogenesis. Moreover, the association of elevated Sema7A and macrophage markers predicted shorter distant metastasis-free survival in a large cohort of breast cancer patients [30]. The same group further analyzed the clinical significance of this biomarker in a large panel of ER+ breast cancers, which are often responsive to hormonal deprivation, apart from a fraction that shows primary drug refractoriness or later incurs in drug-resistant relapses. Not only was it confirmed that Sema7A expression is a strong biomarker of shorter patient survival, but it was found in association with late recurrence, correlated with resistance to hormonal therapy. Experimental evidence demonstrated the role of Sema7A signaling in conferring resistance to estrogen deprivation and promoting disease progression and metastasis [32].

 Figure 2 

Semaphorin signaling in the tumor microenvironment. Semaphorins are major regulators of angiogenesis, acting as inhibitors or as promoters of endothelial cell functions. Other semaphorins regulate the activity of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), in turn impacting on immune response and angiogenesis. A subset of so-called immunoregulatory semaphorins have also been implicated in tumor immune-evasion. In addition to their role in neural development, semaphorins may also control the functional coupling between cancer cells and neuronal projections found in the tumor microenvironment.

Thus, in addition to Sema4C, Sema7A could represent another potential therapeutic target and a predictive biomarker for ER+ breast cancer patients at high risk for resistance to hormonal therapy and metastatic relapse. Notably, previous reports showed that Sema7A is partly shed from the cell surface into the tumor microenvironment and can be detected in the blood, which could enable a convenient assessment of its level by liquid biopsies. A recent study furthermore demonstrated the activity of Sema7A released in association with cancer cell derived exosomes [33].

The role of Sema4D in breast cancer appears quite complex based on current literature. Sema4D is a transmembrane protein (capable of short range cell-cell signaling); however, upon shedding by MT1-MMP it is converted into a soluble form, which may bind to its main receptor PlexinB1 expressed on the surface of multiple cell types in the tumor microenvironment, including cancer cells, endothelial cells and immune cells. In fact, Sema4D/PlexinB1 signaling has been reported to promote tumor angiogenesis and invasive growth in experimental models [34,35]. Two main downstream mechanisms have been implicated in these functions: the transactivation of tyrosine kinase receptors Met and ErbB2, and the activation of the GTPase RhoA, with consequent phosphorylation of MAPK and Akt effector cascades (see Figure 1B). Moreover, Sema4D was found to mediate RhoA phosphorylation, a regulatory mechanism of invasion and metastasis currently under investigation [36].

In keeping with these data, Sema4D knock-down in breast cancer cells was found to suppress tumor growth in vivo, angiogenesis, and bone metastases formation in mouse models [36]. At odds with these findings, Sema4D and PlexinB1 levels detectable in human breast tumor samples appear of unclear prognostic significance. For instance, higher expression of Sema4D and PlexinB1 has been statistically associated with ER-positive tumors, characterized by better prognosis [37,38]. However, divergent findings were reported in other studies (e.g. [39]), suggesting that multivariate analysis of larger case panels is required to elucidate this issue. Moreover, due to their distribution in diverse cell types in the tumor microenvironment, the detection of Sema4D and its receptor might reflect the representation of other components beyond cancer cells.

Interestingly, breast carcinoma cells show high propensity to metastasize to bones, where they usually form osteolytic lesions. In bone homeostasis, Sema4D has an osteoblast-inhibitor activity and it is normally produced by osteoclasts [40]; however, in metastatic lesions a locally increased concentration of Sema4D can promote osteolysis. Notably, it was reported that breast cancer patients treated with the anti-hormonal drug tamoxifen have reduced plasmatic levels of Sema4D [41], an effect which could potentially account for some of the reported bone-protective effects of this drug. The same mechanism was not observed in response to another class of hormonal drugs, the aromatase inhibitors (AI), which may further negatively affect bone mass due to deprivation of bone protective estrogens.

Another recent study unveiled that Sema4D expression in primary breast tumor samples is associated with the formation of brain metastasis, consistent with the evidence of Sema4D activity promoting cancer cell extravasation in an experimental model of blood-brain barrier [42]. The relevance of Sema4D in the tumor microenvironment was confirmed in multiple tumor types beyond breast carcinoma, which has prompted the preclinical validation of targeted antibodies interfering with its function [43]. In particular, the treatment with an anti-Sema4D antibody was found to promote anti-cancer immune response in mouse models by favoring the recruitment of cytotoxic T lymphocytes [44,45]. These studies unveiled a further putative function of this semaphorin, fostering immune evasion in the tumor microenvironment. A humanized version of this anti-Sema4D antibody has been validated for application in clinical trials [46] and it is currently under investigation in a phase 1b/2 study, in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (NCT03268057). Notably, recent data challenged the view that targeting Sema4D in tumors is always beneficial [47], suggesting that further investigation may be help to exploit Sema4D at its best as therapeutic target in cancer.

Ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecologic cancers. Most symptoms in early stage ovarian cancer are nonspecific, and difficult to diagnose before spreading occurs. A consistent tumor angiogenesis is known to drive the growth and metastatic dissemination of ovarian cancers, leading to poor prognosis. VEGF plays a critical role in vessel formation under both physiological and pathological conditions. Moreover, diverse semaphorin members of the class 4 promote angiogenesis. One important example is Sema4D, which mediates endothelial cell chemotaxis, microvessel formation and distant metastasis, via its receptor PlexinB1. Indeed, Sema4D and VEGF levels increase in association with higher malignancy of epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Univariate analysis indicated that the overall survival and progression-free survival of epithelial ovarian cancer patients with high expression of Sema4D were lower than in patients with Sema4D-negative tumors. Together with VEGF, Sema4D is thereby considered an independent adverse prognostic factor for epithelial ovarian cancer patients [48].

Sema3C gene was originally identified for being overexpressed in cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells [49], and it was found to be readily induced by diverse chemotherapeutic drugs and by ionizing radiations. Experimental evidence showed that Sema3C expression was responsible for sustaining drug-refractoriness, and capable to raise primary resistance in cisplatin-sensitive cells [49]. These findings are furthermore consistent with a recent broad bioinformatic analysis of semaphorin expression data in human tumors, which indicated a significant inverse correlation between Sema3C expression and sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs [50]. Notably, NRP1, a known co-receptor of Sema3C, has been repeatedly implicated in cancer cell resistance to therapy [51].

The elevated expression of another secreted semaphorin, Sema3E, has been associated with high-grade ovarian endometrioid carcinomas, but not other ovarian epithelial tumors, and found to promote tumor cell invasiveness via its specific receptor PlexinD1 [52]. It was reported instead that Sema3A mRNA and protein expression is lower in ovarian carcinoma compared to normal tissue, and tumors with lowest levels are significantly associated with higher FIGO stage, histological grade, and the presence of lymphatic and distant metastasis [53]. Sema3A could therefore represent a valuable prognostic marker for ovarian cancers; moreover, its activity could be potentially exploited for therapeutic approaches, currently validated in other preclinical tumor models in mice [54,55], as discussed later in this review.

Cervical cancer. Cervical cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide. Infection by specific human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes and other risk factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer. Elevated Sema4C expression has been associated with poor prognosis in cervical cancer patients. Similar to what reported above for breast cancer, experimental evidence indicated that Sema4C can promote EMT; moreover, it was found to sustain resistance to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in cervical cancer cells, while knocking-down its expression partly recovered drug sensitivity [56].

Moreover, Sema4D plays an important role in cervical cancer, due to its involvement in lymphangiogenesis and tumor cell migration [57]. Tumors with high expression of Sema4D showed abundant lymphangiogenesis, lymphatic vessel invasion, and the occurrence of lymph node metastases, possibly due to increased VEGF-C/D expression. In addition, analysis of survival data provided compelling evidence that high levels of Sema4D were significantly associated with an unfavorable outcome in cervical cancer patients. PlexinB1 inhibition experiments demonstrated that its ligand Sema4D enhances cervical cancer cell invasive potential. Sema4D⁄PlexinB1 signaling enhanced cell invasiveness through the activation of RhoA, MAPK and AKT pathways. These data suggests an important association between high Sema4D expression and reduced survival of cervical cancer patients [57]. Therefore, Sema4D may serve as prognostic biomarker of disease progression, and potentially suggest the adoption of differential protocols for the therapy and patient follow-up.

Sema5A, has also been identified as a novel proangiogenic molecule with elevated expression in stage IIb cervical cancer, compared to earlier stages. Sema5A overexpression was significantly associated with lymphangiogenesis, poor prognosis, and the metastatic potential of cervical cancer cells. PlexinB3 is a Sema5A receptor. Importantly, the association between Sema5A and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in cervical cancer has been linked to three mechanisms. First, Sema5A induces lymphangiogenesis and the contact between tumor cells and lymphatic endothelial cells. Second, Sema5A induces MMP-2 and MMP-9 that mediate the invasive behavior of cervical cancer cells, which involves PlexinB3 receptor and the intracellular PI3K/AKT pathway. Finally, Sema5A/PlexinB3 signaling promotes lymphangiogenesis by inducing Met-mediated VEGF-C expression. Therefore, Sema5A is considered a prognostic indicator in cervical cancer [58].

Endometrial cancer. Endometrial cancer is the sixth most common cancer in women worldwide. In endometrial carcinoma, lymph node invasion is critical for choosing the treatment. The transcriptome of endometrial cancer samples was investigated with the aim of predicting the risk for lymph node metastatic invasion (LN + /LN- status) prior to lymphadenectomy. Interestingly, one of the identified biomarkers of LN- status is Sema3D [59], interacting with neuropilins and plexin receptors. Sema3D suppressor activity in this context may be explained by the functional competition with lymphoangiogenesis-inducing factors VEGFC and VEGFD, which have also been reported to bind neuropilins.

Esophageal-Gastric cancer. The esophageal carcinoma is the eighth most common cancer worldwide and it is divided into two major histological types: esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and esophageal adenocarcinomas. Gastric cancer is another major cause of death worldwide; notably, chronic infection by Helicobacter pylori is causative of gastric cancer. Gastric cardia adenocarcinoma was formerly associated with esophageal or gastric carcinomas; however, due to the distinct epidemiological and biological characteristics, these tumors are now diagnosed independently.

In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) a 3p chromosomal deletion is one of the most common genetic changes. Notably, chromosome 3 allelic loss and promoter hypermethylation are considered the main causes of Sema3B downregulation, and Sema3B reduced expresson was detected at mRNA and protein levels in ESCC tumor specimens [60]. Furthermore, the downregulation of Sema3B was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, advanced clinical stage and poor patient survival. A multivariate analysis indicated that downregulation of Sema3B could be used as an independent prognostic predictor for ESCC patients. It is well known that Sema3B is involved in the regulation of apoptosis and cell growth in different tumor types; indeed Sema3B can block ESCC cells at the G1/S checkpoint through inhibition of the PI3K/AKT signaling transduction pathway, upregulation of p53 and p21 expression and downregulation of cyclin D1 expression. Therefore Sema3B may be an important tumor-suppressor gene lost during the malignant progression of ESCC, and a valuable prognostic marker for ESCC patients [60]. Also in gastric cardia adenocarcinoma (GCA) the loss of heterozygosity in chromosome 3p is one of the most frequent events, likely to impact on the expression of putative tumor suppressor genes, including SEMA3B. Notably, miR-6872 was identified within an intron of SEMA3B gene [61]; notably, intronic miRNAs are co-expressed and may play synergetic role with their host genes. Furthermore, promoter hypermethylation impacted on the expression of SEMA3B-AS1, a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) encoded by the complementary genomic DNA strand. In 2019, Guo et al., reported a similar expression trend of SEMA3B, SEMA3B-AS1, and miR-6872-5p in GCA tissues, as well as a common activity suppressing gastric cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Antisense lncRNAs can regulate the expression of sense protein coding genes in cis, and in this study SEMA3B-AS1 was found to induce SEMA3B expression. Downregulation of miR-6872-5p has been detected in GCA tissues and gastric cancer cells, and it may act as tumor-suppressor miRNA synergistic with its host gene SEMA3B, inhibiting GCA cell migration and invasion. In summary, SEMA3B, SEMA3B-AS1, and miR-6872-5p seem to play a suppressor role in GCA tumor development, and their expression levels are coregulated by aberrant promoter hypermethylation and histone modification. Moreover, due to the association of SEMA3B, SEMA3B-AS1, and miR-6872-5p expression with cancer prognosis, they represent potential prognostic markers for predicting GCA patient survival [61].

In a preliminary study, the expression of Sema6B in GCA primary samples was positively correlated with the presence of metastasis; moreover, Sema6B-silencing in a gastric tumor cell line suppressed migration and invasion, suggesting a potential relevance of this gene as GCA promoter [62].

The tumor microenvironment plays a major role in gastric carcinoma progression. In particular, this is characterized by a chronic inflammatory scenario comprising, among other cells, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). In 2018, Li et al. demonstrated that Sema4D is highly expressed in gastric carcinoma tissues, and its levels were significantly associated with the histological subtype, TMN stage, and lymph node metastasis. Notably, a significant correlation was also found with the distribution of the TAMs marker CD68, in gastric carcinoma tissues. This may indicate a functional association between Sema4D production and TAMs activity, which is an important factor promoting invasion and metastasis. Moreover, the combined detection of CD68 and Sema4D protein markers was shown to have a potential for predicting gastric carcinoma progression and prospective patient prognosis [63].

Colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is considered a prime example of step-wise carcinogenesis, since the number of genetic alterations increases with the advancing histopathological stage of the disease, from early adenomatous lesions to invasive carcinomas and metastatic cancers. Recent studies revealed a close correlation between Sema3D levels and CRC disease progression. In fact, gene expression profiling demonstrated that Sema3D levels are higher in normal colorectal mucosa than in CRC tissues [64]. Consistent with data reported above for cervical cancer, the authors furthermore found that Sema3D expression in CRC was inversely correlated with lymph node metastasis; and Sema3D-silencing was found to promote cancer cell migration in vitro, consistent with the idea of a metastasis-inhibitory activity of this semaphorin. Univariate survival analysis of CRC patients showed that tumors expressing high levels of Sema3D are associated with longer survival than those expressing low levels. Moreover, secreted Sema3D can be detected into patients' blood, and it may be considered a potential serological marker of CRC progression. Indeed, Sema3D serum levels were found to be significantly reduced in CRC patients compared with normal healthy controls. Taken together, these findings indicate that Sema3D may function as a tumor suppressor gene during the formation and development of CRC and it might also represent a biomarker for the early diagnosis and prognostic assessment of CRC [64]. The implicated receptors and Sema3D signaling mechanisms were unfortunately not investigated in this work.

Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that Sema4C expression is an independent prognostic predictor of shorter overall survival of CRC patients. Sema4C levels in tumors were correlated with an EMT gene expression profile and its expression was enriched in CRC bearing a consensus molecular subtype 4 (CMS4) signature [65].

As for other cancers, Sema4D expression has furthermore been associated with CRC development. In particular, one study correlated Sema4D levels with those of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), suggesting that it is more abundantly expressed in hypoxic tumors. An elevated expression of Sema4D was closely associated to the presence of lymphatic metastasis, and to poorly differentiated tumors with advanced tumor stage. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that Sema4D levels represent an independent indicator of poor prognosis in CRC patients [66]. These findings are consistent with those of a subsequent study, which further revealed that the expression of Sema4D-receptor PlexinB1 in CRC samples correlated with lymph node metastasis; moreover, the combined elevated expression of both Sema4D and PlexinB1 was found to be a stronger independent risk factor for disease relapse, in a multivariate analysis [67].

Interestingly, Sema4D might also represent a potential therapeutic target for CRC patients. In fact, anti-angiogenic VEGF-targeted drugs are currently applied in combination with chemotherapy for CRC treatment. Emerging evidence has shown that Sema4D may represent an alternative pro-angiogenic factor produced by tumor cells in response to anti-VEGF therapy, responsible for resistance to therapy. Indeed, anti-angiogenic drugs upregulated Sema4D levels in cancer cells and tumor tissues, and Sema4D can exert significant proangiogenic activity in tumors [68]. Thus, based on these data, targeting Sema4D could represent a treatment option for cancer patients developing adaptive resistance to anti-VEGF drugs. Such an approach is now amenable due to the development of Sema4D-blocking antibodies assayed in clinical studies [46]; however, experimental evidence in vivo about the effect of combined treatments is currently missing.

Pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most prevalent form of pancreatic cancer and also the most lethal of all common cancers. This is largely due to its indolent growth in early stages and late diagnosis when already locally invasive, metastatic and resistant to most conventional chemotherapeutics. Genomic studies uncovered genetically altered molecular pathways in PDAC that may regulate the metastatic process; in particular, genes encoding semaphorins and their receptors were found to be among the cellular pathways most frequently altered at the genetic level [69,70]. Notably, immunohistochemical detection of high Sema3D expression in primary PDAC was associated with wide metastatic disease and decreased patient survival. Moreover, Sema3D-depeleted cancer showed decreased invasive and metastatic potential in culture and in mouse models. Thus, Sema3D may represent a novel therapeutic target and prognostic biomarker of metastatic pancreatic cancer [71].

The expression of Sema5A was found to be significantly higher in PDAC samples compared to paired normal adjacent tissue derived from the same patient; moreover, Sema5A levels were further increased in metastatic lesions [72]. In this study, Sema5A expression increase was similarly associated with the progression of neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors (PNET). In vitro assays indicated that Sema5A is actively stimulating pancreatic cancer cell migration, via PlexinB3 receptor-associated Met tyrosine kinase; however gene knock-down experiments revealed that the role of Sema5A in PDAC is complex and needs further elucidation [73].

The study of mouse PNET models revealed that Sema3A expression is commonly downregulated in tumors, compared to normal tissues, consistent with the known role of this semaphorin as angiogenesis inhibitor. Moreover, the localized delivery of Sema3A effectively tamed tumor angiogenesis, leading to vessel normalization and to a significant inhibition of hypoxia-driven metastatic spreading [54]. In another study based on IHC analysis, Sema3A expression with its co-receptor NRP1 in PDAC was instead correlated with poor patient prognosis [74]. In order to avoid any undesirable NRP1-mediated activities of Sema3A (e.g. see [75]), an engineered Sema3A-derived recombinant molecule was developed for systemic delivery, which selectively elicited plexin-dependent therapeutic effects in both PDAC and PNET mouse models [55]. Considering the broad relevance of Sema3A activity in various tumor types, this molecule could represent a promising tool for cancer treatment.

Head and Neck Cancer. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) arises from epithelial cells found in the mucosa of the oral cavity, lips, larynx, pharynx, and nasal passages. It is a locally aggressive neoplasm, invading the adjacent bones of the face, with propensity to early metastatic dissemination.

Sema3A expression was an independent prognostic predictor of overall survival of HNSCC patients, correlating lower expression with poor outcome. This putative tumor suppressor activity was confirmed by experimental studies in cultured cancer cells and in preclinical mouse models [76].

In contrast, high Sema4D expression in HNSCC was significantly associated with bone invasion [77]. Moreover, consistent with its activity promoting osteoclastogenesis and bone resorptive activity, the knock-down of Sema4D in HNSCC cells reduced bone invasion in preclinical mouse models. Sema4D secreted by cancer cells was also found to regulate the tumor microenvironment, promoting the recruitment from the bone marrow of myeloid-derived suppressor cells [78], and the formation of a dense fibrotic peri-tumoral stroma [79], both hindering anti-cancer immune response. Notably, Sema4D was detected in the plasma of head and neck cancer patients at significantly higher levels compared to healthy donors [79].

Lung cancer. For several decades, largely linked to tobacco smoke, lung cancer has been the most common cancer in the world. Now, it remains the third most common cancer, but it is well recognized as heterogeneous disease, comprising several different subtypes. Based on main histotype, prognostic, and therapeutic implications, lung cancers are divided in two main groups: small-cell carcinoma (SCLC) and non-small-cell carcinoma (NSCLC). NSCLCs have the highest incidence, and are generally insensitive to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. They essentially consist in three subtypes: squamous cell carcinoma, large cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma; although all lung cancer subtypes are strongly associated with exposure to tobacco smoking, adenocarcinoma is the most common subtype in never-smoker patients.

As mentioned above, SEMA3B is located in a site of frequent allele loss and hypermethylation in lung cancers, and experimental evidence indicated its role as tumor suppressor gene also in this context [8,80,81]. In experimental preclinical models in mice, the forced expression of Sema3B impaired lung cancer growth, possibly accounted by anti-angiogenic activity.

Sema4B has also been recently implicated as a suppressor of NSCLC tumorigenesis, due to its ability to inhibit the PI3K pathway and thereby activate FoxO1 transcriptional factor, negatively controlling cancer cell proliferation. Experimental evidence in vivo, in mouse models, indicated that Sema4B expression in NSCLC is a critical determinant of tumor progression, and suggested its relevance as novel therapeutic target in this tumor type [82].

One of the issues of therapy resistance in NSCLC is due to a peculiar mechanism named vasculogenic mimicry (VM), based on vascular tubes formation by tumor cells undergoing plastic reprogramming to acquire an endothelial-like phenotype. Notably, it was observed an increased expression on Sema4D in NSCLC tumor samples compared to adjacent normal tissues, and Xia et al. demonstrated, in vitro and in mouse models, that Sema4D-overexpressing NSCLC tissues are prone to form VM structures [83]. According to prior reports, the Sema4D receptor PlexinB1 controls the RhoA/ROCK pathway, which is also involved in VM formation. Therefore, Sema4D may represent a useful biomarker predicting tumors likely to develop VM channels and become resistant to anti-angiogenic therapies; moreover, the availability of Sema4D-blocking antibodies could potentially allow to target this semaphorin in combined therapeutic regimens.

Sema5A downregulation in lung adenocarcinoma tissues was associated with poor overall survival. Furthermore, since transmembrane Sema5A can be cleaved by ADAM17 metalloproteases, this mechanism contributes to the downregulation of surface‑exposed Sema5A in lung adenocarcinoma cells [84]. In vitro and in vivo experiments with NSCLC cellular models indicated a clear tumor suppressor activity of Sema5A. These findings suggested a suppressor role for Sema5A in lung adenocarcinomas and a potential relevance as prognostic biomarker [84].

A recent work demonstrated that low Sema6A expression correlates with high tumor recurrence rates in lung cancer patients [85]. Moreover, the authors found that Sema6A could suppress NSCLC cell migration in vitro, by the activation of NRF2/HMOX1 axis. NRF2 is considered a tumor suppressor, and HMOX1 its downstream effector to suppress lung cancer cells migration, via the transcriptional regulation of genes such as plasminogen activator urokinase (PLAU), MMP1, MMP9, and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP3). These data indicated that Sema6A acts as a cancer suppressor and a potential biomarker of less aggressive lung cancers [85].

The onset of mutations causing resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) represents a clinical challenge for the treatment of lung cancer. Notably, Kinehara and colleagues found that Sema7A is highly induced by the EGFR pathway, via mTOR kinase activity. Moreover, since mTOR represent an effector hub for various external stimuli, Sema7A expression can be induced by additional oncogenic upstream signals beside EGFR. Indeed, the combined treatment of EGFR-mutated cells with an mTOR inhibitor resulted in higher sensitivity to therapy with EGFR-TKIs. Based on this study, Sema7A levels may be considered a biomarker of mTOR pathway activation, useful for guiding therapeutic decisions in EGFR-dependent lung adenocarcinoma patients. In addition, experimental data indicated that Sema7A-Integrin-beta1 signaling itself promotes ERK activation, which can bypass the impact of EGFR-TKIs, featuring a candidate therapeutic target as well as a putative novel biomarker for predicting drug-resistance in patients with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma [86].

Bladder cancer. Bladder cancer (BC) is a poorly treatable chronic disease, with a high tendency to recur and progress. Ideally, the assessment of relevant biomarkers in urine samples could be a convenient method for early BC detection. It was recently reported that Sema3A levels in urine are significantly correlated with presence of urothelial cancer [87]. Consistently, histopathological analyses proved that the expression of Sema3A in bladder tissue increases with the tumor grade. Based on these data, a combined analysis of urine Sema3A levels and urine sediment cytology could represent a significant biomarker for early BC diagnosis, with relatively high sensitivity and specificity.

Prostate cancer. Prostate cancer (PC) is possibly the most frequent tumor in males, although it often remains at subclinical level. Despite the compliance of early-stage PC to surgery and radiation therapy, locally advanced and metastatic prostate carcinomas remain a clinical challenge. Normal prostate and carcinoma cells typically express the androgen receptor (AR) and are dependent on its signaling. Thus, chemical castration is often used as a first-line therapy for advanced disease; however, the onset of hormonal therapy resistance is usually ensuing, largely through mutations of the androgen receptor (AR), aberrant AR signaling, or AR bypass mechanisms. Interestingly, it was found that AR activity induces Sema3C expression, via the GATA2 transcription factor [88]. Actually, Sema3C is a secreted semaphorin with a pleiotropic and partly controversial activity in the tumor microenvironment, as it was reported to variedly regulate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, cell migration angiogenesis, and cancer cell stemness [89]. This could be explained by the fact that Sema3C may trans-activate multiple receptor tyrosine kinases involved in the growth of prostate carcinoma cells, and potentially also implicated in resistance to androgen-deprivation therapies [90]. In fact, Lee et al. identified several small molecule inhibitors of Sema3C that reduce the phosphorylation of EGFR, HER2/ErbB2, SHC, and MAPK, collectively providing evidence in experimental models that Sema3C inhibition may represent a promising avenue for developing targeted therapies against PC and possibly other cancer types [91]. Notably a recent bioinformatic analysis of class-3 semaphorin expression in human tumors (based on TCGA datasets) indicated a remarkable heterogeneity in the association of Sema3C levels with better or worse prognosis in diverse tumor types [50]. Although these data may suffer from relevant discrepancy between gene expression at mRNA and protein levels, further analysis of Sema3C association with prostate cancer patients' prognosis and resistance to therapy is warranted.

The invasion of nerve sheaths by cancer cells, termed perineural invasion, is a key feature of prostate cancer; in particular, perineural invasion appears to be a major route for prostate cancer metastatic spreading, which is the main obstacle to cure. Interestingly, Sema4F expression in cancer cells has been correlated with the induction of axonal sprouting in vitro, and with increased nerve density and perineural invasion in PC [92]. In addition, in vitro experiments indicated that Sema4F induces PC cell proliferation and migration. Notably, Sema4F expression in prostate cancer cells is independently predictive of tumor recurrence [92]. Due to its activity to induce axonogenesis and perineural cancer cell invasion, Sema4F may also represent a potential target to inhibit PC progression. It is intriguing to note that, in an earlier study, Sema4F had been found to suppress the proliferation of differentiated Schwann cells ensheating axonal processes in peripheral nerves [93]; this apparent discrepancy may suggest the involvement of different receptor complexes or signaling modes (forward or reverse), which are presently unknown.

Hematological malignancies. Multiple myeloma (MM) is a neoplastic disorder due to the proliferation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow, which is accompanied by upregulation of bone resorption, due to increased abundance and activity of osteoclasts, whereas bone formation is suppressed due to reduced osteoblast number and activity. MM is thought to evolve from a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), which progresses to smoldering MM (SMM) and finally to MM.

Sema3A has an important role in bone homeostasis, mostly promoting bone formation. Bone-marrow-derived Sema3A can be found in serum in significant amounts; however, Lavi and colleagues found that its serum concentration drops significantly in patients with MM in advanced stage, but not in pre-neoplastic conditions, such as MGUS or SMM. The observed effect is consistent with the idea that the replacement of normal bone marrow with malignant cells depletes Sema3A production. It was thereby proposed that monitoring Sema3A levels could allow secondary prevention and early diagnosis, as well as serve as indicator of therapeutic response and prognostic marker of MM progression. Moreover, a promising tumor suppressor activity of Sema3A was also observed in this context, upon overexpression of its furin-cleavage resistant isoform in a mouse model of MM [94].

In a complementary scenario, Sema4D and its receptor, Plexin-B1, have been found elevated in the serum and bone marrow of patients with active MM [95]. As discussed above for osteolytic metastasis, Sema4D is actually expressed by osteoclasts and negatively regulates osteoblast activity and bone formation [40]. It therefore appears that MM is associated with decreased Sema3A-dependent bone formation, as well as upregulated Sema4D-dependent bone loss.

Sema3A and Sema4D were furthermore similarly implicated in leukemia cell regulation. In particular, Sema3A expression was found to be lower in leukemia cells compared to normal hematopoietic cells found in bone marrow [96] and Sema3A levels are significantly reduced in the serum of acute leukemia patients compared to healthy individuals [94]. Consistent with the posited tumor suppressor role of this semaphorin, experimental studies ex vivo have shown that Sema3A can suppress the growth and promote the apoptosis of human leukemic cells, via diverse mechanisms; Sema4D, in contrast, was found to promote leukemia cell survival and growth [97].

Gliomas. Gliomas are the most prevalent primary tumors of the brain and spinal cord. They include a spectrum of subtypes, from localized grade-I tumors to infiltrating grade IV glioblastomas (GBM). Sema3C protein levels were analyzed in astrocytoma tissues of different malignancy grade, revealing a marked increase of expression in aggressive glioblastomas compared to lower grade astrocytomas (i.e. WHO grades I, II, and III) [98]. Notably, Sema3C upregulation was distinctly associated with poor prognosis in glioma patients. These correlations were not confirmed based on analyses at mRNA level, although the significance of this discrepancy has not been explained.

GBM is the most aggressive glioma subtype, rapidly growing and highly invasive, making the median overall survival of GBM patients after diagnosis approximately only 12-15 months. In this context, low expression of Sema6A was associated with a larger tumor volume, as well as shorter time to recurrence and overall survival, featuring an independent prognostic factor for GBM patients [99]. In vitro experiments showed that Sema6A could remarkably suppress the GBM cell migration, invasion, and viability. Thus, Sema6A might act as a candidate prognostic marker for GBM.

Targeting semaphorin signaling for cancer therapy

As introduced above, a large body of evidence obtained in experimental models in culture and in mice demonstrated that semaphorins act as regulators of tumor progression, and that interfering with their functions can significantly alter disease outcome. These preclinical data have thus endorsed the idea of targeting semaphorin signaling pathways for the treatment of human cancers. Based on current knowledge, this could be aimed not only to hinder tumor progression, but also to foster responsiveness to standard and innovative therapeutic approaches, and curb mechanisms of drug resistance. An important issue to consider is the functional relevance of the targeted semaphorin signals in cancer versus normal tissues. In fact, although semaphorins are best known as developmental cues, they also regulate e.g. the immune function and bone homeostasis in the adult, which are potentially relevant fields both for cancer therapeutics and to check out any serious adverse effects. Notably, the functional role of these signals in the adult nervous system is poorly understood, but the potential impact of systemic-delivered semaphorin-targeted molecules may depend on their capacity to cross an integer blood-brain barrier.

In order to interfere with tumor-promoting semaphorins, function-blocking antibodies appear the most actual approach [100]. Indeed, humanized anti-Sema4D antibodies are the first tool that has been successfully developed for clinical application. In particular, the safety and tolerability of VX15/2503 was validated in two independent phase-1 trials, enrolling over 50 patients bearing advanced solid tumors or multiple sclerosis (NCT01313065, NCT01764737). The drug was well tolerated, as treatment-related adverse events were mostly nausea, urinary tract infection, and fatigue (grade 1 or 2, around 10% prevalence each). Only one pancreatic cancer patient experienced a grade 3 dose-limiting liver toxicity [46] [101]. The mechanism of action of this Sema4D-targeted antibody is not fully understood, since this semaphorin was reported to act on cancer cells and many other cell populations in the tumor microenvironment [21]. Consistent with its activity limiting CTL infiltration in tumors, this drug is currently under evaluation in three distinct Phase-1b/2 trials for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancers, head and neck squamous cell cancers, or pancreatic and colorectal cancers, in combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitors anti-PD-L1 avelumab (NCT03268057), or anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab and anti-PD1 nivolumab (NCT03690986, NCT03373188), respectively. The development of further semaphorin-blocking molecules for clinical application is expected. Beyond antibodies, alternative approaches under consideration could be small molecules, which can ensure a better scalability of production and a wider organ biodistribution. However, so far, only the Sema3A inhibitors SM-216289/xanthofulvin and SM-345431/vinaxanthone were validated, which have been applied to promote tissue regeneration, e.g. in preclinical mouse models of spinal cord injury [102]. Moreover, soluble extracellular domains of the plexins have been successfully used in experimental mouse models as decoy receptors capturing secreted semaphorin ligands, including for cancer treatment [14][90]. It should be noted, however, that such approach may not be ideal for the functional blockade of transmembrane semaphorins, as it was found to trigger their reverse signaling in other studies [25] [103].

Another potential option could be to directly target semaphorin receptors, e.g. by function-blocking antibodies. One such example, directed against PlexinB1, has been shown to inhibit breast cancer development in a mouse model [104]. Notably, this approach could offer an opportunity to circumvent the functional redundancy between diverse semaphorins binding the same receptor; on the other hand, however, it is still unclear whether it may impinge on ligand-independent functions, warranting further investigation. This issue is particularly relevant in case of neuropilins (NRPs), which are promiscuous co-receptors for secreted semaphorins as well as for ligands of the VEGF family and other soluble growth factors [105,106]. Moreover, NRPs can form signaling complexes with a variety of cell surface molecules, which enables them with a broad spectrum of biological activities, also in cancer context. Intriguingly, while NRPs can bind many tumor-suppressor semaphorins, they are in fact considered tumor-promoting molecules per se; thus, NRP1 targeting is gaining increasing interest for cancer therapy, independent of semaphorin functions [107,108].

On a complementary line of intervention, semaphorins that are often downregulated in human cancers, and have been found to suppress tumor development in preclinical models, could in principle be used as a blueprint to design novel anti-cancer drugs. In fact, the systemic administration of two engineered semaphorin molecules, including a NRP1-independent Sema3A superagonist, has been assayed in mice, achieving successful inhibition of tumor growth and metastatic dissemination, without significant adverse effects [16][55]. Notably, the development of large recombinant proteins applicable for clinical application is still a challenge, and first-in-men trials with this kind of semaphorin superagonists are hopefully forthcoming. Cross-linking antibodies or other molecular tools capable of achieving ligand-independent activation of semaphorin receptors could represent another avenue for investigation.

Conclusions

Semaphorin signals have a multifaceted role in tumor development, which is still under deep investigation. They can regulate cancer cell behavior, but also control tumor angiogenesis and the function of immune cells recruited from the circulation, among other things. Interestingly, Sema4F-driven perineural invasion of prostate cancer cells, associated with tumor progression, highlighted another potentially important aspect of their activity in this context, deserving further studies.

Accumulating evidence indicates that selected semaphorins may represent useful biomarkers for the diagnosis and especially the prognostic evaluation of various human tumors. For instance, the elevated expression of certain family members has been recurrently associated with advanced tumor stage and poor patient prognosis. Certain semaphorins are also promising predictors of the response to anti-cancer therapies, including standard chemo/radiotherapy (e.g. Sema3C, Sema4C), anti-angiogenic drugs (e.g. Sema4D), anti-hormonal treatments (e.g. Sema4C, Sema7A), and other targeted molecular therapies, such as with anti-EGFR inhibitors (Sema7A). Moreover, preclinical evidence supported the identification of some of these molecules as relevant targets for therapy themselves. For instance, antibodies directed against Sema4D, which is a prominent example of this kind, are currently under assessment in clinical trials. It should be noted that semaphorin activity in the tumor microenvironment may be complicated by potential diverse impacts in target cells characterized by distinctive receptor complexes, which warrants further investigation of the anti-tumor mechanisms of action of these drugs.

On the other hand, semaphorins that are considered putative tumor suppressors based on experimental evidence, are frequently downregulated in human cancer cells compared to normal counterparts, and their expression may represent a biomarker of better patient prognosis. Actually, the mechanisms of semaphorin disregulation in tumors are still largely unknown. Mutations have been infrequently reported, while genomic hypermethylation seems to be responsible for the downregulation of semaphorins acting as tumor suppressors. Novel regulatory mechanisms are also emerging, such as for example the expression of intronic miRNAs and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) associated with Sema3B. In some cases (e.g. Sema3A), the systemic delivery of these “inhibitory” semaphorins for cancer therapy has been validated in preclinical studies resulting in inhibition of tumor progression. Thus, a better understanding of the implicated tumor-suppressive mechanisms will enable an optimized targeting of these molecules, and the identification of predictive markers of responsiveness to prospective “semaphorin-based” therapies.

Abbreviations

AI: aromatase inhibitors; AR: androgen receptor; BC: bladder cancer; CRC: colorectal cancer; EGFR: epidermal growth factor receptor; EGFR-TKIs: EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors; EMT: epithelial mesenchymal transition; ER: receptor for estrogen; ESCC: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; GBM: glioblastoma; GCA: cardia adenocarcinoma; HER2: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HIF-1α: hypoxia-inducible factor-1α; HMOX1: Heme-oxygenase-1; HNSCC: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; HPV: human papillomavirus; IGFBP3: IGF binding protein-3; IHC: immunohistochemistry; LECs: lymphatic endothelial cells; lncRNA: long non-coding RNA; LNM: lymph node metastasis; MGUS: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance; MM: multiple myeloma; MMPs: matrix metalloproteinases; NRF2: Nuclear Factor, Erythroid-2-Like-2; NRP: neuropilin; NSCLC: non-small cell lung carcinoma; PC: prostate cancer; PDAC: pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PI3K: phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; PLAU: plasminogen activator urokinase; PNET: neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors; PR: receptor for progesterone; PSI: plexin-semaphorin-integrin; SCLC: small cell lung carcinoma; Sema: sempahorin; SMM: smoldering multiple myeloma; TAMs: tumor associated macrophages; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; VM: vasculogenic mimicry.

Acknowledgements

The research activity of the authors is supported by the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC-IG grant #19923 and AIRC-5perMille grant #21052, to L.T.) and by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants no. 81911530169, 81903088, 81850410547, and 81670180, to H.Y.).

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. Alto LT, Terman JR. Semaphorins and their signaling mechanisms. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017;1493:1-25

2. Worzfeld T, Offermanns S. Semaphorins and plexins as therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014;13:603-21

3. Neufeld G, Mumblat Y, Smolkin T, Toledano S, Nir-Zvi I, Ziv K. et al. The semaphorins and their receptors as modulators of tumor progression. Drug Resist. Updat. 2016;29:1-12

4. Battistini C, Tamagnone L. Transmembrane semaphorins, forward and reverse signaling: Have a look both ways. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016;73:1609-22

5. Gurrapu S, Tamagnone L. Semaphorins as Regulators of Phenotypic Plasticity and Functional Reprogramming of Cancer Cells. Trends Mol. Med. 2019;25:303-14

6. Tamagnone L. Emerging Role of Semaphorins as Major Regulatory Signals and Potential Therapeutic Targets in Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:145-52

7. Neufeld G, Mumblat Y, Smolkin T, Toledano S, Nir-Zvi I, Ziv K. et al. The role of the semaphorins in cancer. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2016;10:652-74

8. Castro-Rivera E, Ran S, Brekken RA, Minna JD. Semaphorin 3B inhibits the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway through neuropilin-1 in lung and breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:8295-8303

9. Shahi P, Wang CY, Chou J, Hagerling C, Gonzalez Velozo H, Ruderisch A. et al. GATA3 targets semaphorin 3B in mammary epithelial cells to suppress breast cancer progression and metastasis. Oncogene. 2017;36:5567-75

10. Sabag AD, Smolkin T, Mumblat Y, Ueffing M, Kessler O, Gloeckner CJ. et al. The role of the plexin-A2 receptor in Sema3A and Sema3B signal transduction. J. Cell Sci. 2014;127:5240-52

11. Rolny C, Capparuccia L, Casazza A, Mazzone M, Vallario A, Cignetti A. et al. The tumor suppressor semaphorin 3B triggers a prometastatic program mediated by interleukin 8 and the tumor microenvironment. J. Exp. Med. 2008;205:1155-71

12. Mishra R, Thorat D, Soundararajan G, Pradhan SJ, Chakraborty G, Lohiteet K al. Semaphorin 3A upregulates FOXO 3a-dependent MelCAM expression leading to attenuation of breast tumor growth and angiogenesis. Oncogene. 2015;34:1584-95

13. Tominaga K, Minato H, Murayama T, Sasahara A, Nishimura T, Kiyokawa E. et al. Semaphorin signaling via MICAL3 induces symmetric cell division to expand breast cancer stem-like cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019;116:625-30

14. Luchino J, Hocine M, Amoureux MC, Gibert B, Bernet A, Royet A. et al. Semaphorin 3E Suppresses Tumor Cell Death Triggered by the Plexin D1 Dependence Receptor in Metastatic Breast Cancers. Cancer Cell. 2013;24:673-85

15. Casazza A, Finisguerra V, Capparuccia L, Camperi A, Swiercz JM, Rizzolio S. et al. Sema3E-Plexin D1 signaling drives human cancer cell invasiveness and metastatic spreading in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2010;120:2684-98

16. Casazza A, Kigel B, Maione F, Capparuccia L, Kessler O, Giraudo E. et al. Tumour growth inhibition and anti-metastatic activity of a mutated furin-resistant Semaphorin 3E isoform. EMBO Mol. Med. 2012;4:234-50

17. Valdembri D, Regano D, Maione F, Giraudo E, Serini G. Class 3 semaphorins in cardiovascular development. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2016;10:641-51

18. Capparuccia L, Tamagnone L. Semaphorin signaling in cancer cells and in cells of the tumor microenvironment - Two sides of a coin. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:1723-36

19. Sakurai A, Doci C, Gutkind JS. Semaphorin signaling in angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis and cancer. Cell Res. 2012;22:23-32

20. Toledano S, Nir-Zvi I, Engelman R, Kessler O, Neufeld G. Class-3 semaphorins and their receptors: Potent multifunctional modulators of tumor progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019 20

21. Franzolin G, Tamagnone L. Semaphorin signaling in cancer-associated inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:377

22. Nishide M, Kumanogoh A. The role of semaphorins in immune responses and autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2018;14:91-103

23. Gurrapu S, Pupo E, Franzolin G, Lanzetti L, Tamagnone L. Sema4C/PlexinB2 signaling controls breast cancer cell growth, hormonal dependence and tumorigenic potential. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25:1259-75

24. Yang Q, Wang Y, Lu X, Zhao Z, Zhu L, Chenet S al. MiR-125b regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition via targeting Sema4C in paclitaxel-resistant breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6:3268-79

25. Gurrapu S, Franzolin G, Fard D, Accardo M, Medico E, Sarotto I. et al. Reverse signaling by semaphorin 4C elicits SMAD1/5- And ID1/3-dependent invasive reprogramming in cancer cells. Sci. Signal. 2019;12:eaav2041

26. Wei JC, Yang J, Liu D, Wu MF, Qiao L, Wang JN. et al. Tumor-associated lymphatic endothelial cells promote lymphatic metastasis by highly expressing and secreting SEMA4C. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:214-24

27. Yang J, Zeng Z, Qiao L, Jiang X, Ma J, Wang J. et al. Semaphorin 4C promotes macrophage recruitment and angiogenesis in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2019;17:2015-28

28. Black SA, Nelson AC, Gurule NJ, Futscher BW, Lyons TR. Semaphorin 7a exerts pleiotropic effects to promote breast tumor progression. Oncogene. 2016;35:5170-78

29. Garcia-Areas R, Libreros S, Simoes M, Castro-Silva C, Gazaniga N, Amat S. et al. Suppression of tumor-derived Semaphorin 7A and genetic ablation of host-derived Semaphorin 7A impairs tumor progression in a murine model of advanced breast carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2017;51:1395-1404

30. Elder AM, Tamburini BAJ, Crump LS, Black SA, Wessells VM, Schedin PJ. et al. Semaphorin 7A promotes macrophage-mediated lymphatic remodeling during postpartum mammary gland involution and in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78:6473-85

31. Tarullo SE, Hill RC, Hansen KC, Behbod F, Borges VF, Nelson AC. et al. Postpartum breast cancer progression is driven by semaphorin 7a-mediated invasion and survival. Oncogene. 2020;39:2772-85

32. Crump LS, Wyatt G, Rutherford TR, Richer JK, Porter WW, Lyons TR. Hormonal regulation of Semaphorin 7a in ER+ breast cancer drives therapeutic resistance. Cancer Res. 2020 Oct 29. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1601. Online ahead of print

33. Elisabetta Ruaro M, Manini I, Sgarra R, Bartolini A, Caponnetto F, Ius T. et al. Semaphorin-7a on exosomes: A promigratory signal in the glioma microenvironment. Cancers (Basel). 2019;11:758

34. Giordano S, Corso S, Conrotto P, Gilestro G, Barberis D, Tamagnone L. et al. The semaphorin 4D receptor controls invasive growth by coupling with Met. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002;4:720-24

35. Ch'ng ES, Kumanogoh A. Roles of Sema4D and Plexin-B1 in tumor progression. Mol. Cancer. 2010;9:251

36. Jiang H, Chen C, Sun Q, Wu J, Qiu L, Gao C. et al. The role of semaphorin 4D in tumor development and angiogenesis in human breast cancer. Onco. Targets. Ther. 2016;9:5737-50

37. Rody A, Holtrich U, Gaetje R, Gehrmann M, Engels K, von Minckwitzet G. et al. Poor outcome in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers predicted by loss of plexin B1. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:1115-22

38. Malik MFA, Ye L, Jiang WG. Reduced expression of semaphorin 4D and plexin-B in breast cancer is associated with poorer prognosis and the potential linkage with oestrogen receptor. Oncol. Rep. 2015;34:1049-57

39. Valente G, Nicotra G, Arrondini M, Castino R, Capparuccia L, Prat M. et al. Co-expression of plexin-B1 and Met in human breast and ovary tumours enhances the risk of progression. Cell. Oncol. 2009;31:423-36

40. Dacquin R, Domenget C, Kumanogoh A, Kikutani H, Jurdic P, Machuca-Gayet I. Control of bone resorption by semaphorin 4D is dependent on ovarian function. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26627

41. Göbel A, Kuhlmann JD, Link T, Wimberger P, Link-Rachner C, Thiele S. et al. Plasma levels of Semaphorin 4D are decreased by adjuvant tamoxifen but not aromatase inhibitor therapy in breast cancer patients. J. Bone Oncol. 2019;16:100237

42. Klotz R, Thomas A, Teng T, Han SM, Iriondo O, Lin L. et al. Circulating tumor cells exhibit metastatic tropism and reveal brain metastasis drivers. Cancer Discov. 2020;10:86-103

43. Tamagnone L, Franzolin G. Targeting semaphorin 4D in cancer: A look from different perspectives. Cancer Res. 2019;79:5146-48

44. Evans EE, Jonason AS, Bussler H, Torno S, Veeraraghavan J, Reilly C. et al. Antibody blockade of Semaphorin 4D promotes immune infiltration into tumor and enhances response to other immunomodulatory therapies. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2015;3:698-01

45. Clavijo PE, Friedman J, Robbins Y, Moore C, Smith E, Zauderer M. et al. Semaphorin4D inhibition improves response to immune-checkpoint blockade via attenuation of MDSC recruitment and function. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2019;7:282-91

46. Patnaik A, Weiss GJ, Leonard JE, Rasco DW, Sachdev JC, Fisher TL. et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of a humanized anti-semaphorin 4D antibody, in a first-in-human study of patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:827-36

47. Zuazo-Gaztelu I, Paez-Ribes M, Carrasco P, Martín L, Soler A, Martínez-Lozano M. et al. Antitumor effects of anti-semaphorin 4D antibody unravel a novel proinvasive mechanism of vascular-targeting agents. Cancer Res. 2019;79:5328-41

48. Chen Y, Zhang L, Liu W xin, Wang K. VEGF and SEMA4D have synergistic effects on the promotion of angiogenesis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2018;23:2

49. Yamada T, Endo R, Gotoh M, Hirohashi S. Identification of semaphorin E as a non-MDR drug resistance gene of human cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997;94:14713-18

50. Zhang X, Klamer B, Li J, Fernandez S, Li L. et al. A pan-cancer study of class-3 semaphorins as therapeutic targets in cancer. BMC Med. Genomics. 2020;13:45

51. Rizzolio S, Cagnoni G, Battistini C, Bonelli S, Isella C, Van Ginderachter JAV. et al. Neuropilin-1 upregulation elicits adaptive resistance to oncogene-targeted therapies. J. Clin. Invest. 2018;128:3976-90

52. Tseng CH, Murray KD, Jou MF, Hsu SM, Cheng HJ, Huang PH. Sema3E/plexin-D1 mediated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in ovarian endometrioid cancer. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19396

53. Jiang H, Qi L, Wang F, Sun Z, Huang Z, Xi Q. Decreased semaphorin 3A expression is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2015;35:1374-80

54. Maione F, Capano S, Regano D, Zentilin L, Giacca M, Casanovas O. et al. Semaphorin 3A overcomes cancer hypoxia and metastatic dissemination induced by antiangiogenic treatment in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2012;122:1832-48

55. Gioelli N, Maione F, Camillo C, Ghitti M, Valdembri D, Morello N. et al. A rationally designed NRP1-independent superagonist SEMA3A mutant is an effective anticancer agent. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018;10:eaah4807

56. Jing L, Bo W, Yourong F, Tian W, Shixuan W, Mingfu W. Sema4C mediates EMT inducing chemotherapeutic resistance of miR-31-3p in cervical cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:17727

57. Liu H, Yang Y, Xiao J, Yang S, Liu Y, Kang W. et al. Semaphorin 4D expression is associated with a poor clinical outcome in cervical cancer patients. Microvasc. Res. 2014;93:1-8

58. Xiao JB, Li XL, Liu L, Wang G, Hao SN, Dong HJ. et al. The association of semaphorin 5A with lymph node metastasis and adverse prognosis in cervical cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2018;18:87

59. Yoshida E, Terao Y, Hayashi N, Mogushi K, Arakawa A, Tanaka Y. et al. Promoter-level transcriptome in primary lesions of endometrial cancer identified biomarkers associated with lymph node metastasis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:14160

60. Tang H, Wu Y, Liu M, Qin Y, Wang H, Wang L. et al. SEMA3B improves the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by upregulating p53 and p21. Oncol. Rep. 2016;36:900-08

61. Guo W, Liang X, Liu L, Guo Y, Shen S, Liang J. et al. MiR-6872 host gene SEMA3B and its antisense lncRNA SEMA3B-AS1 function synergistically to suppress gastric cardia adenocarcinoma progression. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:705-22

62. Ge C, Li Q, Wang L, Xu X. The role of axon guidance factor semaphorin 6B in the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer. J. Int. Med. Res. 2013;41:284-92

63. Li H, Wang JS, Mu LJ, Shan KS, Li LP, Zhou YB. Promotion of Sema4D expression by tumor-associated macrophages: Significance in gastric carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2018;24:593-601

64. Wang Z, Ding M, Qian N, Song B, Yu J, Tang J. et al. Decreased expression of semaphorin 3D is associated with genesis and development in colorectal cancer. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2017;15:67

65. Hou Y, Wang W, Zeng Z, Gan W, Lv S, Li T. et al. High SEMA4C expression promotes the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and predicts poor prognosis in colorectal carcinoma. Aging (Albany. NY). 2020;12:21992-018

66. Wang JS, Jing CQ, Shan KS, Chen YZ, Guo XB, Cao ZX. et al. Semaphorin 4D and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α overexpression is related to prognosis in colorectal carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015;21:2191-98

67. Ikeya T, Maeda K, Nagahara H, Shibutani M, Iseki Y, Hirakawa K. The combined expression of Semaphorin4D and PlexinB1 predicts disease recurrence in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:525

68. Ding X, Qiu L, Zhang L, Xi J, Li D, Huang X. et al. The role of semaphorin 4D as a potential biomarker for antiangiogenic therapy in colorectal cancer. Onco. Targets. Ther. 2016;9:1189-1204

69. Biankin A V, Waddell N, Kassahn KS, Gingras MC, Muthuswamy LB, Johns AL. et al. Pancreatic cancer genomes reveal aberrations in axon guidance pathway genes. Nature. 2012;491:399-405

70. Balakrishnan A, Penachioni JY, Lamba S, Bleeker FE, Zanon C, Rodolfo M. et al. Molecular profiling of the “plexinome” in melanoma and pancreatic cancer. Hum. Mutat. 2009;30:1167-74

71. Foley K, Rucki AA, Xiao Q, Zhou D, Leubner A, Mo G. et al. Semaphorin 3D autocrine signaling mediates the metastatic role of annexin A2 in pancreatic cancer. Sci. Signal. 2015;8:ra77

72. Saxena S, Hayashi Y, Wu L, Awaji M, Atri P, Varney ML. et al. Pathological and functional significance of Semaphorin-5A in pancreatic cancer progression and metastasis. Oncotarget. 2018;9:5931-43

73. Saxena S, Purohit A, Varney ML, Hayashi Y, Singh RK. Semaphorin-5A maintains epithelial phenotype of malignant pancreatic cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1283

74. Müller MW, Giese NA, Swiercz JM, Ceyhan GO, Esposito I, Hinz U. et al. Association of axon guidance factor Semaphorin 3A with poor outcome in pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2007;121:2421-33

75. Casazza A, Laoui D, Wenes M, Rizzolio S, Bassani N, Mambretti M. et al. Impeding Macrophage Entry into Hypoxic Tumor Areas by Sema3A/Nrp1 Signaling Blockade Inhibits Angiogenesis and Restores Antitumor Immunity. Cancer Cell. 2013;24:695-709

76. Wang Z, Chen J, Zhang W, Zheng Y, Wang Z, Liu L. et al. Axon guidance molecule Semaphorin3A is a novel tumor suppressor in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:6048-62

77. Takada H, Ibaragi S, Eguchi T, Okui T, Obata K, Masui M. et al. Semaphorin 4D promotes bone invasion in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2017;51:625-632

78. Younis RH, Han KL, Webb TJ. Human Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma-Associated Semaphorin 4D Induces Expansion of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. J. Immunol. 2016;196:1419-29

79. Derakhshandeh R, Sanadhya S, Han KL, Chen H, Goloubeva O, Webb TJ. et al. Semaphorin 4D in human head and neck cancer tissue and peripheral blood: A dense fibrotic peri-tumoral stromal phenotype. Oncotarget. 2018;9:11126-44

80. Kuroki T, Trapasso F, Yendamuri S, Matsuyama A, Alder H, Williams NN. et al. Allelic loss on chromosome 3p21.3 and promoter hypermethylation of semaphorin 3B in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2003;63:3352-55

81. Loginov VI, Dmitriev AA, Senchenko VN, Pronina IV, Khodyrev DS, Kudryavtseva AV. et al. Tumor suppressor function of the SEMA3B gene in human lung and renal cancers. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0123369

82. Jian H, Zhao Y, Liu B, Lu S. SEMA4B inhibits growth of non-small cell lung cancer in vitro and in vivo. Cell. Signal. 2015;27:1208-13

83. Xia Y, Cai XY, Fan JQ, Zhang LL, Ren JH, Li ZY. et al. The role of sema4D in vasculogenic mimicry formation in non-small cell lung cancer and the underlying mechanisms. Int. J. Cancer. 2019;144:2227-38

84. Ko PH, Lenka G, Chen YA, Chuang EY, Tsai MH, Sher YP. et al. Semaphorin 5A suppresses the proliferation and migration of lung adenocarcinoma cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2020;56:165-77

85. Chen LH, Liao CY, Lai LC, Tsai MH, Chuang EY. Semaphorin 6A Attenuates the Migration Capability of Lung Cancer Cells via the NRF2/HMOX1 Axis. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:13302

86. Kinehara Y, Nagatomo I, Koyama S, Ito D, Nojima S, Kurebayashi R. et al. Semaphorin 7A promotes EGFR-TKI resistance in EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma cells. JCI insight. 2018;3(e):123093

87. Vadasz Z, Rubinstein J, Bejar J, Sheffer H, Halachmi S. Overexpression of semaphorin 3A in patients with urothelial cancer. Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig. 2018;36:161.e1-161.e6

88. Tam KJ, Dalal K, Hsing M, Cheng CW, Khosravi S, Yenki P. et al. Androgen receptor transcriptionally regulates semaphorin 3C in a GATA2-dependent manner. Oncotarget. 2017;8:9617-33

89. Hui DHF, Tam KJ, Jiao IZF, Ong CJ. Semaphorin 3C as a therapeutic target in prostate and other cancers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:774

90. Peacock JW, Takeuchi A, Hayashi N, Liu L, Tam KJ, Al Nakouzi N. et al. SEMA 3C drives cancer growth by transactivating multiple receptor tyrosine kinases via Plexin B1. EMBO Mol. Med. 2018;10:219-38

91. Lee CCW, Munuganti RSN, Peacock JW, Dalal K, Jiao IZF, Shepherd A. et al. Targeting Semaphorin 3C in Prostate Cancer with Small Molecules. J. Endocr. Soc. 2018;2:1381-94

92. Ding Y, He D, Florentin D, Frolov A, Hilsenbeck S, Ittmann M. et al. Semaphorin 4F as a critical regulator of neuroepithelial interactions and a biomarker of aggressive prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013;19:6101-11

93. Parrinello S, Noon LA, Harrisingh MC, Wingfield Digby P, Rosenberg LH, Cremona CA. et al. NF1 loss disrupts Schwann cell-axonal interactions: A novel role for semaphorin 4F. Genes Dev. 2008;22:3335-48

94. Lavi N, Kessler O, Ziv K, Mumblat Y, Eiza N, Paran Y. et al. Semaphorin-3A inhibits multiple myeloma progression in a mouse model. Carcinogenesis. 2018;39:1283-91

95. Terpos E, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Christoulas D, Bagratuni T, Bakogeorgos M, Gavriatopoulou M. et al. Semaphorin 4D correlates with increased bone resorption, hypercalcemia, and disease stage in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8:42

96. Wang Z, Li Y, Wu X, Cheng S, Yang L, Wu Y. KDR and Sema3 genes expression in bone marrow stromal cells and hematopoietic cells from leukemia patients and normal individuals. Hematology. 2005;10:307-312

97. Wei L, Li H, Tamagnone L, You H. Semaphorins and their receptors in hematological malignancies. Front. Oncol. 2019;9:382

98. Vaitkiene P, Skiriute D, Steponaitis G, Skauminas K, Tamašauskas A, Kazlauskas A. High level of Sema3C is associated with glioma malignancy. Diagn. Pathol. 2015;10:58

99. Zhao J, Tang H, Zhao H, Che W, Zhang L, Liang P. SEMA6A is a prognostic biomarker in glioblastoma. Tumor Biol. 2015;36:8333-40

100. Meyer LAT, Fritz J, Pierdant-Mancera M, Bagnard D. Current drug design to target the Semaphorin/Neuropilin/Plexin complexes. Cell Adhes. Migr. 2016;10:700-08

101. LaGanke C, Samkoff L, Edwards K, Jung Henson L, Repovic P, Lynch S. et al. Safety/tolerability of the anti-semaphorin 4D antibody VX15/2503 in a randomized phase 1 trial. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. NeuroInflammation. 2017;4:e367

102. Kaneko S, Iwanami A, Nakamura M, Kishino A, Kikuchi K, Shibata S. et al. A selective Sema3A inhibitor enhances regenerative responses and functional recovery of the injured spinal cord. Nat. Med. 2006;12:1380-89

103. Sun T, Yang L, Kaur H, Pestel J, Looso M, Nolte H. et al. A reverse signaling pathway downstream of Sema4A controls cell migration via Scrib. J. Cell Biol. 2017;216:199-215

104. Worzfeld T, Swiercz JM, Looso M, Straub BK, Sivaraj KK, Offermanns S. ErbB-2 signals through Plexin-B1 to promote breast cancer metastasis. J. Clin. Invest. 2012;122:1296-1305

105. Rizzolio S, Tamagnone L. Multifaceted Role of Neuropilins in Cancer. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011;18:3563-75

106. Niland S, Eble JA. Neuropilin: Handyman and Power Broker in the Tumor Microenvironment. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Springer. 2020 p: 31-67

107. Dumond A, Pagès G. Neuropilins, as Relevant Oncology Target: Their Role in the Tumoral Microenvironment. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:662

108. Napolitano V, Tamagnone L. Neuropilins controlling cancer therapy responsiveness. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:2049

Author contact

Corresponding authors: luca.tamagnoneit; youhua307com.

Received 2020-10-2
Accepted 2020-12-6
Published 2021-1-15

Citation styles

©2024 Ivyspring International Publisher. Terms of use