PDF

Theranostics 2023; 13(15):5247-5265. doi:10.7150/thno.88998 This issue Cite

Review

The role of radiolabeling in BNCT tracers for enhanced dosimetry and treatment planning

Sajid Mushtaq^1,2, , Park Ji Ae¹, Jung Young Kim¹, Kyo Chul Lee¹, Kwang Il Kim¹

1. Division of Applied RI, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences (KIRAMS) Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea.
2. Department of Nuclear Engineering, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, P. O. Nilore, Islamabad 45650, Pakistan.

✉ Corresponding author: Sajid Mushtaq, Division of RI-Applied Research, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences (KIRAMS) Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea. Telephone number: +02-970-1660; Fax number: +02-970-1341; E-mail address: sajidmushtaqedu.pk. More

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) are potent technologies for non-invasive imaging of pharmacological and biochemical processes in both preclinical and advanced clinical research settings. In the field of radiation therapy, boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) stands out because it harnesses biological mechanisms to precisely target tumor cells while preserving the neighboring healthy tissues. To achieve the most favorable therapeutic outcomes, the delivery of boron-enriched tracers to tumors must be selective and efficient, with a substantial concentration of boron atoms meticulously arranged in and around the tumor cells. Although several BNCT tracers have been developed to facilitate the targeted and efficient delivery of boron to tumors, only a few have been labeled with PET or SPECT radionuclides. Such radiolabeling enables comprehensive in vivo examination, encompassing crucial aspects such as pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, tumor selectivity, and accumulation and retention of the tracer within the tumor. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the essential aspects of BNCT tracers, focusing on their radiolabeling with PET or SPECT radioisotopes. This leads to more effective and targeted treatment approaches which ultimately enhance the quality of patient care with respect to cancer treatment.

Keywords: BNCT, PET, SPECT, radiolabeling, theranostics, targeted therapy

1. Introduction

Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) represents a remarkable advancement in radiation therapy. It utilizes biological mechanisms to selectively target tumor cells while sparing the neighboring healthy tissues. It is a highly efficient targeted radiotherapy technique with higher therapeutic benefits than those of traditional radiotherapy [1, 2]. Various micro- and macro biologically active molecules have been utilized as tracers for BNCT. These tracers are enriched with Boron-10 (¹⁰B) isotopes because of their high interaction cross-sections of 3,837 barns with thermal neutrons [3]. Thermal neutron and ¹⁰B interactions yield unstable ¹¹B isotopes that undergo nuclear reactions to produce highly active ⁷Li (175 keV/μm) and ⁴He particles (150 keV/μm), along with gamma rays (Figure 1) [4]. In a biological system, these particles with high linear energy transfer (LET), ⁷Li (175 keV/μm), and α particles (150 keV/μm), deposit their energy along their path (5-8 μm), which is shorter than the average cell diameter [5, 6]. It is possible to treat subclinical lesions using tumor-specific boron-containing compounds because BNCT is a biologically, not a geometrically, targeted modality [7]. Nevertheless, the precise timing of thermal neutron irradiation plays a pivotal role in BNCT, as it determines the optimal concentration of ¹⁰B within the tumor relative to healthy tissues, thereby achieving the maximum tumor-to-normal tissue (T/N) ratio [8].To accomplish this, it is imperative to employ boron tracers that exhibit an appropriate retention time in the tumor and demonstrate an accumulation of boron that is at least three times higher in the tumor than in the background tissues. Moreover, maintaining a tumor boron concentration of ≥20 ppm is crucial for successful BNCT outcomes [9].

To advance the development of BNCT as a viable clinical modality, several tumor-targeting drugs (Table 1) have been used for the efficient delivery of ¹⁰B isotopes to the tumors [10-30]. Irradiation of ¹⁰B-containing tumors with high-intensity thermal neutron beams generates an intricate distribution of doses in the tissues. However, the absorbed dose pattern cannot be explained using conventional concepts [31]. This is attributed to the inhomogeneous release of energy from the targeted tissue. Considering the small range of ⁷Li and ⁴He particles, the effectiveness of BNCT depends on the precise location and accumulation of boron within the tumor cells [32]. Therefore, it is imperative to study the physiology, pharmacokinetics, organ distribution, retention, and excretion of ¹⁰B in the patients [33]. To achieve this, appropriate techniques and technologies that are capable of accurately quantifying the amount of boron in various bodily compartments and body fluids, such as urine and blood, are required. Additionally, imaging technologies that are capable of visualizing the distribution of ¹⁰B at the cellular level should be employed to provide valuable information regarding its localization within tumor cells and surrounding tissues [34]. Non-invasive techniques are considered optimal for determining¹⁰B concentrations in vivo; therefore, molecular imaging has emerged as an effective solution [35]. Imaging modalities such as single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET), offer distinct advantages over conventional techniques (Figure 2) by providing high-resolution information without compromising the integrity of the organism [36-40]. Importantly, PET and SPECT can achieve sufficient spatial resolution, ensuring the accurate characterization of the distribution and concentration of ¹⁰B in intact organism. Several general reviews have been published to discuss the progress in the field of BNCT [41-49]. However, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest and the most efficient methodologies for synthesizing and radiolabeling BNCT probes for therapy, as well as in vivo imaging using PET- or SPECT-based radioisotopes. Furthermore, it provides detailed pharmacokinetic results at the preclinical or clinical stages.

 Figure 1 

Schematic overview of the BNCT principle and its impact on tumor cell improvement.

2. Direct and indirect radiolabeling of BNCT tracers

Small BNCT tracers have been synthesized and directly radiolabeled for noninvasive molecular imaging. Initially, the (L)-4-dihydroxy-borophenylalanine (BPA) and sodium mercaptoundecahydro-closo-dodecaborate (BSH) BNCT tracers were directly radiolabeled and studied in preclinical and clinical settings [50,51]. These small molecules have fast pharmacokinetics, and after the targeted delivery of boron to the tumor, these tracers are immediately excreted from the body. Recently, antibodies and inorganic and organic nanoparticles have been used to synthesize BNCT tracers [52]. These tracers have gained widespread acceptance for boron delivery because of their specificity and high affinity for tumors. However, the use of these BNCT precursors is limited by their comparatively large size, which results in slow accumulation in tumors and slow excretion from the body. Owing to their slow pharmacokinetics, a long time is needed to achieve an adequate boron accumulation in the tumor and a high T/N ratio. Long-lived radionuclides have been used to address these issues [53]. However, these radionuclides can emit high radiation doses to the healthy tissues, especially the bone marrow. In recent decades, several novel methodologies have emerged to address the pharmacokinetic limitations of large BNCT tracers. An alternative approach is the indirect radiolabeling of the tracer in vivo (Figure 3) [54, 55]. In this pre-targeting strategy, the targeting tracer is injected into the body. Once it reaches maximum accumulation in the tumor and is mostly cleared from healthy tissues, a complimentary small molecule radiolabeled with a suitable radioisotope is administered for the in vivo click reaction [56, 57]. The indirect radiolabeling strategy allows for the efficient quantification of the BNCT tracer within the tumor with significantly low radiation doses to healthy tissues.

3. Radionuclides used for PET and SPECT imaging of BNCT tracers

In nuclear imaging, PET and SPECT are extensively used to determine the pharmacokinetics and dosimetry of radiolabeled tracers of medical interest [58]. These imaging technologies are capable of visualizing the in vivo behavior. The quantitative monitoring of radiolabeled BNCT tracers for several hours, days, or even weeks provided a suitably long biological and physical half-life of the radionuclide (Table 2) [59-60]. SPECT technology is based on the quantification of gamma-ray photons emitted by radioisotopes such as radioiodine (¹²³I or ¹²⁵I), indium (¹¹¹In) or technetium (^99mTc) [61]. SPECT detectors record the absorbed photons, in two-dimensional projections. By processing these 2D images captured from various angles, it is possible to reconstruct the required 3D images [62]. PET imaging is performed by detecting positrons emitted by beta-emitting radioisotopes, such as fluorine (¹⁸F), copper (⁶⁴Cu), gallium (⁶⁸Ga), and zirconium (⁸⁹Zr) [63]. The PET imaging system based on the detection of a pair of 511 keV gamma-ray photons produced by positron electron annihilation. Scintillator detectors convert gamma rays into visible light photons, which are detected by photomultiplier tubes. Afterwards, the data are processed and converted into 3D images [64]. PET imaging has demonstrated better sensitivity and spatial resolution (2-4mm) than those of SPECT imaging (4-6mm) in clinical settings. Moreover, PET imaging enables the quantitative determination of radiotracer uptake in the tissue of interest, which is a challenge for SPECT owing to its low spatial resolution [65]. PET and SPECT imaging techniques can be integrated with other imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to acquire more comprehensive anatomical information [66]. Moreover, the in vivo stability of radiolabeled compounds plays a pivotal role in molecular imaging because, in their free state, radioisotopes can be distributed in tumors and other healthy tissues leading to spurious signals (Table 3).

 Figure 2 

A schematic overview of various imaging modalities, highlighting their unique capabilities, strengths, and limitations. PET and SPECT exhibit several promising advantages over traditional imaging technologies.

 Figure 3 

Schematic illustration of radiolabeling strategies for molecular imaging. (A) Direct radiolabeling of BNCT tracers. (B) Indirect radiolabeling of BNCT tracers.

 Figure 4 

Introducing the pioneering and highly effective BNCT tracers. (A) Structure of L-BPA and corresponding PET tracers. (B) Structure of O-carborane and corresponding PET tracer. (C) Structure of D-BPA and corresponding PET tracer.

 Scheme 1 

Synthesis of¹⁸F labeled ¹⁸F-FBPA analogues. (A) Electrophilic substitution reaction for the radiofluorination of (L)-4-dihydroxy-borophenylalanine using ¹⁸[F]-F₂ or ¹⁸F-acetylhypofluorite (¹⁸F-AcOF). (B) Synthesis of ¹⁸F-FBPA-fructose complex utilizing fructose at neutral pH: Enhancing water solubility for superior biocompatibility.

4. Radionuclides used for PET imaging of BNCT tracers

4.1 ¹⁸F labeled BNCT tracers

The crucial step towards producing therapeutically beneficial BNCT is the effective and targeted delivery of ¹⁰B atoms to cancerous cells at higher concentrations than those delivered to background tissues [67]. Several tumor-specific carriers have been developed and tested to achieve this goal. In the first era of BNCT, the BPA and BSH tracers (Figure 4) showed promising results. For instant, BPA demonstrated high tumor accumulation, low toxicity, and higher tumor retention times than those of the other tracers under testing. Although these BNCT tracers show nonspecific uptake by tumors, the¹⁰B installed phenylalanine derivative has been used in clinical trials in the United States and Japan [68].

For complete in vivo imaging and detailed pharmacokinetic studies, Ishiwata and co-workers synthesized ¹⁸F-FBPA (Scheme 1A). To our knowledge, that was the first in vivo PET imaging study using radiolabeled BPA. In that study, a structural analog of boronophenylalanine (L-BPA) was radiolabeled via the electrophilic substitution of radio-fluorine on borono-acid-containing aromatic ring.¹⁸F-FBPA was used to study the boron concentration in brain tumors. The radiolabeled compound showed enhanced lipophilicity compared to that of its predecessor [69]. It accumulated in the liver, spleen, pancreas, intestine and testes 10 min after the intravenous injection; however, the radioactivity signal decreased over time. The brain uptake showed an increase with time and was observed to reach maximum level at 2 hr postinjection and remained consistent afterwards. One hr postinjection, a considerable amount of tracer was detected in the urine. PET imaging showed promising features of the radiotracer and the tumor accumulation and retention were high. Owing to the rapid washout from the background tissues, high tumor-to-background (T/B) ratios were observed 1 hr postinjection. It was concluded that for maximum therapeutic benefits, thermal neutron irradiation should be applied 1.5 hr postinjection [70]. BPA has several limitations when used as a BNCT tracer; one of the prominent drawbacks is its poor water solubility. To address this limitation, complexation of BPA with fructose is considered a potential solution. Kabalka and co-workers and later Imahori and co-workers synthesized ¹⁸F-FBPA using electrophilic substitution reaction and fructose was used for complexation of BPA to enhance the solubility [71, 72]. The ¹⁸F-FBPA complex with fructose (Scheme 1B) exhibited improved solubility; nevertheless, its biodistribution profile was differed from that of ¹⁸F-FBPA and BPA when administered alone [72]. Clinical trials have been performed in patients with glioblastoma. The PET-based quantification studies revealed that BPA complex with fructose showed more complex pharmacokinetics than that of its peer amino acids, and it was similar to that of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG). The procedure provided ¹⁸F-FBPA compound but, with low specific activity. This could be possible because radio-fluoride adhered to the targeting material, and carrier-added fluorine gas was used to recover the radio-fluoride. The specific activity was 1,000 times less than that of nucleophilic substitution reaction. Several conditions were investigated to improve the radiochemical yield and specific activity. The BPA and fluorine gas concentrations were optimized, various eluent were used for better HPLC separation, and the concentration of fluorine as the carrier gas in the target was optimized. However, no significant improvements were observed [72].

 Scheme 2 

Synthesis of ¹⁸F-Labeled BPA analogue (¹⁸F-FBPA) through nucleophilic radio-fluorination reaction with diborono precursor for enhanced molecular imaging capabilities.

The conventional nucleophilic radio˗fluorination reaction is highly viable; however, the undesirable fluorodeboronation hampers this approach. To exploit the advantages of this approach, diboronos were installed on an aromatic ring.¹⁸F-FBPA was obtained by replacing the boron group at the ortho position. This selective radio˗fluorination used one boron group to install ¹⁸F for PET imaging, whereas the other boron group remained intact for therapeutic studies (Scheme 2). The radiolabeling reaction provided ¹⁸F-FBPA with high specific activity and minimal structural changes in the parent BPA structure; however, the accumulation of ¹⁸F-FBPA in the organs varied depending on the mode of injection. This phenomenon could be explained by the fact that achieving high˗contrast images requires only a minute amount of ¹⁸F˗FBPA. However, for BNCT, a high tracer concentration, i.e. as several milligrams per gram of body weight, is necessary. Unlike the bolus injection method used for ¹⁸F-FBPA, BNCT requires continuous intravenous administration of BPA over an extended time period. However, clinical studies have demonstrated that comparable results can be obtained using BNCT dosimetry.¹⁸F-FBPA exists as a pair of enantiomers, namely the D-and L-isomers. The isomers exhibit distinct pharmacokinetics in humans. In preclinical studies, D-isomers demonstrated superior tumor uptake with a higher T/B ratio (6.93) compared to that of L-isomer, which yielded a ratio of 1.45 in a glioma model [73]. This was attributed to the enhanced washout of the D-isomer from the background tissues, resulting in a higher contrast ratio. Another notable characteristic of the D-isomer is its excretion through the kidneys, which facilitates visualization of the abdominal area. Further in vivo studies on the D-isomer of ¹⁸F-FBPA are warranted to explore its potential for improved therapeutic benefits through BNCT treatment [73].

Despite several promising results, inadequate tumor targeting and metabolic instability have persisted since the initial application of ¹⁸F-FBPA. To ensure better therapeutic results, trifluoroborate functional group-based tracers for BNCT were synthesized. The use of trifluoroborate-based structures provided stable boron for targeting in BNCT, while simultaneously enabling PET imaging through ¹⁸F labeling via ¹⁸F to ¹⁹F exchange reaction. For example, a boronic ester can be transformed into its corresponding trifluoroborate using potassium hydrogen fluoride under acidic conditions. The ¹⁸F radiolabeling was achieved through radio-fluoro exchange reaction, resulting in a high radiochemical yield (>50%) in just 15 min. Several aliphatic and aromatic tracers containing trifluoroborate groups have been synthesized using this strategy. The initial screening revealed that the stability of aromatic trifluoroborates depends on various factors, including the presence of electron-withdrawing groups at the ortho and para positions (Figure 5). For instance, the substitution of a trialkylphosphonium salt significantly prolongs the stability of trifluoroborate, maintaining it for more than 3,397 hr [74]. Similarly, zwitterionic amino substitution has been introduced to synthesize stable aliphatic trifluoroborates. The reported fluoroboronotyrosine (FBY) was radiolabeled with¹⁸F via an exchange reaction (Figure 6A). After HPLC purification, a radiochemical yield of 30% was achieved for radiolabeled FBY, while maintaining radiochemical purity of over 99%. This novel BNCT tracer exhibited excellent stability under oxidative conditions. After continuous interaction with an H₂O₂ solution for 4 hr, the compound exhibited 98% stability. In contrast to ¹⁸F-FBY, ¹⁸F-FBPA showed 99% conversion to a byproduct within 1 hr [75]. Interestingly, a boron concentration of 19.59 ppm was observed in a mouse xenograft model using ¹⁸F-FBY. The high T/N ratio confirmed the potential of ¹⁸F-FBY as a PET imaging agent (Figure 6B). However, a high concentration of boron is required in tumors to meet the therapeutic agent criteria. Compared with BPA, FBY offers several advantages, including high stability and water solubility, without the need for auxiliary groups such as fructose. During clinical trials, ¹⁸F-FBY exhibited high uptake in both low and high-grade tumors. However, the second important factor, which is the concentration of the tracer or the boron level, has not yet been determined in humans [76]. In another example, Confalonieri et al. synthesized a library of BNCT tracers using various combinations of monosaccharide and ammonium trifluoroborate groups. Among the available structures, triazole-based conjugates (Figure 6C) met the cytotoxicity criteria. Compound Glc1 (Figure 6D) was selected for ¹⁸F radiolabeling and in vivo study. However, the radiolabeled precursor showed poor stability and low brain uptake as compared with ¹⁸F-FDG and could not be further evaluated for BNCT [77].

The electrophilic fluorination technique was also investigated using non-glioma BNCT tracers, including boronofenbufen, which belongs to the class of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Radio˗fluorinated analog of boronofenbufen have been used for imaging cholangiocarcinoma, a type of cancer that is often challenging to diagnose due to its occurrence inside the liver. Electrophilic fluorination of boronofenbufen yielded two enantiomers in moderate radiochemical yields. However, PET images confirmed a low T/B ratio, indicating that it is not a suitable imaging agent for cholangiocarcinoma imaging or BNCT therapy [78]. Although multiple¹⁸F˗labeled BNCT compounds have been developed, the short half˗life of ¹⁸F (110 min) limits its suitability as a radioisotope. Therefore, the use of long˗lived radioisotopes becomes imperative to comprehensively assess the detailed biodistribution and tumor uptake of BNCT tracer.

 Figure 5 

The structural diversity and half-lives of alkyl- and acyltrifluoroborates: Unlocking the promising potential for BNCT applications.

 Figure 6 

Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of organotrifluoroborates (A) Detailed radiosynthesis of ¹⁸F labeled fluoroboronotyrosine ¹⁸F-FBY.(B)B16-F10 tumor bearing mouse was injected with ¹⁸F-FBY, and a PET image was acquired 1 hr postinjection. ¹⁸F-FBY exhibited high tumor accumulation compared to that of the healthy tissues. The biodistribution study (n = 4), which was conducted 1 hr postinjection utilizing B16-F10 tumor-bearing mice, further supports the PET imaging data. Adapted with permission from [75], copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. (C, D) Representative organotrifluoroborates sugar conjugate.

4.2 ⁶⁴Cu labeled BNCT tracers

Copper-64 is one of the most promising clinically used PET radioisotopes [79]. Several studies reported radiolabeling of BNCT tracers using ⁶⁴Cu to study their pharmacokinetics. In one study, glioblastoma was treated with BNCT and BSH as a boron source. The in vivo pharmacokinetics of ⁶⁴Cu˗labeled BSH and its analog were monitored. BSH-DOTA exhibited intercellular accumulation, but demonstrated insufficient therapeutic benefit. Interestingly, the addition of short arginine residues BSH-nR-DOTA (Figure 7A) increased the cellular uptake of boron, as indicated by in vivo and in vitro studies. The in vivo, boron distribution was studied 24 hr postinjection and PET images showed BSH-3R-DOTA localization in both the tumor and its surrounding periphery. However, BSH-DOTA and BSH-2R-DOTA showed minimal accumulation in the tumor area. Interestingly, the tumor uptake of ⁶⁴Cu-BSH-3R-DOTA was 2.25, 2.38, and 2.97 %ID/cc at 6, 12, and 24 h, respectively. This uptake was highly selective for the tumor, indicating the targeted nature of the compound. The T/N brain ratios at 6 and 24 h postinjection were 15.5 and 8.2, respectively, for ⁶⁴Cu-labeled BSH-3R-DOTA, and 3.1 and 3.7, respectively, for ⁶⁴Cu-labeled BSH-DOTA. The strategy of labeling with ⁶⁴Cu was efficient in identifying a suitable BSH tracer for BNCT [80]. Recently, some groups have explored the potential of boronated porphyrins to identify the best boron delivery tracers. Porphyrins have demonstrated various preclinical advantages, including high specificity in targeting tumor cells, prolonged retention, and potential for photodynamic therapy and BNCT [81], in the in vivo imaging using fluorescence, PET or SPECT imaging [82-83]. Several boronated porphyrins have exhibited promising results in preclinical studies. However, direct toxicity of platelets has hampered their use in clinical studies [84]. In a study, boronated porphyrins have been modified with PLGA-mPEG micelles to mitigate toxicity, resulting in a new formulation called boronated porphyrin nanoparticles (BPNs). BPNs were radiolabeled with ⁶⁴Cu to investigate tumor accumulation and pharmacokinetic before neutron irradiation (Figure 7B) [85].⁶⁴Cu-BPN exhibited significant tumor accumulation in xenografted mice and PET imaging facilitated excellent visualization for monitoring the boron concentration in the tumor. PET imaging confirmed the advantages of administrating multiple bolus injections at lower tracer concentrations over a single injection at a high concentration. Multiple injections resulted in a higher concentration of boron in the tumor (>100 ppm), and T/B ratio was exceptionally high (>50%). BNCT, with the assistance of ⁶⁴Cu-BPN tracer, completely cured B16-F10 tumors in the animals. However, intravenous injection of⁶⁴Cu-BPNswas associated with plasma instability and an early release of boronated porphyrins.

 Figure 7 

Schematic representation of ⁶⁴Cu labeled BNCT tracers. (A) ⁶⁴Cu labeled BSH-n(R)-DOTA precursor (n= 0, 2, 3; R= Arg). (B) Schematic illustration of synthesis of ⁶⁴Cu-labeled boronated porphyrins nanoparticles.

To achieve better stability, carborane was immobilized on covalent organic polymers (COPs) and a porphyrin structure was used for the chelation of ⁶⁴Cu. The complex was further modified with DSPE-PEG to enhance its stability and solubility in the aqueous phase (Figure 8A). The tracer ⁶⁴Cu labeled DSPE-BCOP-5T was evaluated in animal models. It was considered to be sufficient despite exhibiting poor stability in fetal bovine serum compared to phosphate-buffered saline. Some in vivo assays revealed a significant tumor uptake after 24 hr (55.24 ± 2.13 ppm) accompanied by intense signals from other organs. Following a single bolus injection, the ratios of T/N and T/B were determined to be 1.46 ± 0.76 and 0.81 ± 0.44, respectively. To enhance contrast imaging, the mice were injected with two additional injections, each administrated 24 hr later. There was a noteworthy increase in tumor uptake, reaching 84.93 ± 2.68 ppm. The ratios of T/N and T/B were 25.20 ± 3.41 and 7.46 ± 0.66, respectively, for three consecutive injections (Figure 8B˗C). The obtained values were indicative of a tumor˗selective treatment which was deemed sufficient for therapeutic purposes. This improvement can be attributed to the enhanced permeability (EPR) and retention effects. The accumulation of boron and high T/B ratios indicated the promising efficiency of DSPE-BCOP-5T. The mice treated with DSPE-BCOP-5T and subsequent neutron irradiation demonstrated suppressed tumor growth through BNCT, highlighting the enhanced treatment effects achieved by DSPE-BCOP-5T [86].

Antibody˗based BNCT remains a promising treatment option. However, the prolonged blood circulation of antibodies has hindered their application. To address this issue copper free click chemistry was tested. In a study by Llop et al., a pre˗targeting strategy for BNCT was attempted using trastuzumab. In this study, the monoclonal antibody (mAb) trastuzumab was modified with trans˗cyclooctene (TCO) to facilitate an in vivo click reaction with tetrazine˗installed; boron˗enriched gold nanoparticles (Tz˗B˗AuNPs). To facilitate the in vivo tracking, the AuNPs were radiolabeled with ⁶⁴Cu [87]. In subsequent experiments, mice with human breast cancer cells (BT-474) were divided into three groups: Group 1 received trastuzumab-TCO (100µg/mouse), Group 2 received trastuzumab without TCO conjugation, 24 h before the Tz˗B˗AuNPs injection; and Group 3 received only the Tz-AuNPs injection. The PET-CT scans quantification data for Group 3 exhibited high accumulation in the liver and spleen and a long residence time in the blood. The highest tumor uptake, reaching 4.76 ± 1.85 %ID cm^-3, was observed at 24 h postinjection, indicating the passive accumulation of the tracer within the tumor due to EPR effect. Interestingly, both Groups 1 and 2 showed very similar biodistribution profile (4.42 ± 2.08 and 3.95 ± 0.38%ID cm^-3, respectively). These findings indicate that the pre˗targeting strategy had a minimal impact on tumor targeting and persistence of radiolabeled tracers within the tumors. It was anticipated that rapid internalization of the mAb would limit the availability of mAb-TCO on the cell periphery, for the click reaction with Tz-AuNPs [87].

Clinically accepted small BNCT tracers have shown several limitations such as poor stability, low solubility, limited biocompatibility, and restricted boron delivery to tumors [88]. To overcome these challenges, boron-containing nanocarriers have been investigated. Recently, boron˗enriched liposomes have been investigated for use in image˗guided BNCT and chemotherapy. In this approach, biocompatible and stable boronated liposomes were developed by covalently conjugating a carboranyl group to the hydrophobic region of phospholipids, resulting in a variety of boronated phospholipids (BoPs) through a thiol˗halo reaction. To form liposomal membranes, known as boronsomes, a boron-containing component was employed, specifically for the hydrophilic head. This arrangement resulted in an internal cavity with the capacity to accommodate additional drugs for synergistic therapy (Figure 9A). The boronsome exhibited long-term stability in 50% bovine serum at 37 °C. At a dosage of 5 mg/mL, the boron content in 4T1 cells reached a level as high as 182.5 ppm, effectively meeting the clinical requirements for BNCT. Remarkably, the boronsomes demonstrated superior cellular uptake compared to that of BPA, well-established boron delivery agent in clinical use, and FBY, a previously documented boronated amino acid derivative. Moreover, at concentrations of 5mg/mL or lower, the boronsomes exhibited excellent biocompatibility and efficacy, with more than 90% cell survival. Subsequently, [⁶⁴Cu] Cu-NOTA-boronsomes were intravenously administered to mice bearing 4T1 tumors, and PET imaging was used to measure the boron concentrations in the organs of interest (Figure 9B). Boronsomes exhibited a tumor boron concentration of 93.3 ppm at 12 hr postinjection. The T/B ratio favored a neutron irradiation time of 12 hr. Biodistribution studies showed a tumor uptake of 5.49 ± 0.22 %ID/g with low uptake in surrounding tissues, indicating tumor selectivity. In comparison studies, boronsome outperformed BPA in terms of tumor boron enrichment and T/B ratio. Interestingly, mice treated with DOX loaded boronsome and subjected to thermal neutron irradiation exhibited remarkable suppression of tumor growth (Figure 9C) [89]. The utilization of DOX loaded boronsome in BNCT treatment shows promising potential for future clinical studies.

 Figure 8 

⁶⁴Cu labeled DSPE-BCOP-5T and preclinical evaluation. (A) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of DSPE-BCOP-5T BNCT tracer. (B) PET/CT images have been obtained for ⁶⁴Cu-DSPE-BCOP-5T at 30 min, 24, and 36 hr postinjection using 4T1 tumor-bearing mice. High tumor uptake is indicated by white arrows (n = 3). (C) Biodistribution data was acquired for ⁶⁴Cu-DSPE-COP-5T in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice 24 hr postinjection (mean ± SE, %ID/g) (n = 6). Adapted with permission from [86], copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.

 Figure 9 

⁶⁴Cu-NOTA-boronsome synthesis, uptake and preclinical evaluation. (A) Schematic illustration of boronated liposome loaded with chemotherapeutic drug (B) CT and PET/CT images of 4T1 tumor bearing mice using ⁶⁴Cu-NOTA-boronsome, (C) Average tumor volume (mm³) (n = 9) of each group of mice utilizing various treatment process calculated up to 20 days post treatment, ****p < 0.001. Adapted with permission from [89], copyright 2022, Springer Nature Limited.

4.3 ⁸⁹Zr labeled BNCT tracers

BNCT has shown promising results in both preclinical and clinical investigations as potential treatment for head, neck, and brain tumors. Nevertheless, the utilization of BNCT for prostate cancer treatment remains elusive due to the absence of a suitable targeting probe [90]. Recently, Flavell and co˗workers attempted a PSMA-based BNCT using PLGA-b-PEG conjugated ACUPA- and DFB- amphiphilic block co-polymer-based nanoparticles for a theranostic study of prostate cancer. ACUPA ligands targeting PSMA and polymers were also loaded with o-carborane to facilitate the delivery of boron to target cells for BNCT treatment [91]. In Addition, the⁸⁹Zr DFB ligands were incorporated for the PET imaging. ⁸⁹Zr was chosen because its long half-life of 78.41 hr matches with the slow pharmacokinetics of the nanoparticles [92].

In vitro assays revealed that DFB (25)ACUPA(75) NPs exhibited remarkable specificity towards PSMA, with an IC50 value of 0.11 μg/mL, compared to 0.59 μg/mL for DFB (25)ACUPA(25) NPs. The high concentration of ACPUA ligands in the DFB (25) ACUPA (75) nanoparticles accounted for this phenomenon. Various in vivo assays demonstrated a relatively low tumor uptake of approximately 1%ID/g in PC3-Pip tumors. Interestingly, it was observed that the tumor uptake in PC3-Pip tumors was two˗folds higher than that of PC3-Flu tumors, which exhibited a value of approximately 0.5%ID/g. The radiotracer did not demonstrate a high affinity for in vivo targets despite the presence of ACUPA ligands. The disparity in tumor uptake can be ascribed to a multitude of factors, including the presence of distinct tumor-associated macrophages, heterogeneous pore sizes in tumors, and NP size. Furthermore, the observed differences in tumors may be partly influenced by passive accumulation facilitated by the EPR effects.

The radiolabeled NPs exhibited significantly higher uptake in the liver (100%ID/g), spleen (200 %ID/g), and kidneys (4 %ID/g). The significant bone uptake indicated nonspecific and weak chelation of ⁸⁹Zr to nanoparticles with functional groups other than DFB chelators. These studies indicated that o-carborane molecules were detached from the PLGA core within 2 hr of injection and subsequently excreted from the bloodstream. Consequently, the tumor exhibits a remarkably low boron uptake. The suboptimal loading and release dynamics of carborane can be attributed to its rigid molecular structure, which limits its interaction with the PLGA units owing to its smaller surface area. Additionally, the weak non-covalent hydrophobic interactions between the carborane and the PLGA unit may also contribute to the suboptimal loading and release behavior. Overall, based on detailed biodistribution studies and PET/CT imaging, it was concluded that the tracer possessed inferior quality and was not suitable for use as a BNCT tracer to treat prostate cancer [91]. In a previous study by Lolp and co˗workers, a pre˗targeting strategy was attempted using boron enriched ⁶⁴Cu labeled AuNPs and trastuzumab antibodies. However, the desired therapeutic results have not been obtained. In another study, boron˗enriched carbon dots were selected as a pre˗targeting strategy, utilizing ⁸⁹Zr labeled trastuzumab antibody. The carbon dots were chosen for their low toxicity, high biocompatibility, high boron loading capacity, and, more importantly, their ultra-small size, which facilitates rapid clearance from healthy tissues [93]. Small boron˗rich carbon dots (B-CDs) were synthesized and decorated with tetrazine to produce B-CD-Tz for pre˗targeting studies. Similarly, the mAb was conjugated with TCO to produce trastuzumab-TCO. In some in vivo experiments,⁸⁹Zr labeled trastuzumab-TCO was administrated to breast cancer xenograft models. PET images demonstrated that 24 hr postinjection was the optimal time point with the highest mAb accumulation in the tumor cells. Additionally,¹⁸F-labeled B-CD-Tz was used to study the biodistribution of and tumor targeting of B-CD-Tz. In the absence of trastuzumab-TCO, the tumor uptake was negligible. Furthermore, within 45 min, B-CD-Tz was cleared from the organs and a strong signal was detected in the bladder. Interestingly, when ¹⁸F˗labeled B˗CD˗Tz was injected 24 hr after trastuzumab-TCO, it exhibited significant tumor accumulation. The high tumor accumulation, which was observed 45 min after the administration of ¹⁸F˗labeled B˗CD˗Tz, confirmed the successful click reaction within the tumor. Although BNCT has not been studied in this particular case, it was concluded that the pre˗targeting strategy holds promise for future applications [93].

Combined chemotherapy and BNCT are likely to offer numerous advantages, particularly if superior tracers with excellent drug release capabilities are used [94]. Controlled drug release has gained attention in the field of covalent organic frameworks (COF) [95]. This exceptional interest can be attributed to several characteristics of COF, including periodic skeletal structures, substantial specific surface area, biological stability, and uniform pore sizes, which guarantee efficient loading and controlled release of the drug [96]. Based on this idea, a carborane-based covalent organic framework (B-COF) was explored for concurrent immunotherapy and BNCT. To achieve high and sustained levels of boron in the tumor for an extended period, as well as controlled delivery of an immune drug, boron capsules in the form of µm-scale B-COF were synthesized. To enhance the in vivo stability and achieve uniform distribution, immune drug-loaded B-COF particles were coated with DSPE-PEG, resulting in the formation of PEG-B-COF particles (Figure 10A). Significant growth inhibition was observed in both MC38 and B16F10 cancer in previous in vitro studies using boron capsules and PEG-B-COF in combination with thermal neutron treatment. For comparison, boron capsules were radiolabeled with ⁸⁹Zr to obtain⁸⁹Zr-boron capsules, which were injected intratumorally into the mice. The vast majority of ⁸⁹Zr-boron capsules exhibited remarkable tumor retention within 24 hr, with negligible leakage into the circulatory system or surrounding tissues (Figure 10B). Subsequently, mice bearing B16F10 cancer cell xenograft were treated with boron capsules on day 6, followed by sequential neutron irradiation on day 7. Mice treated with boron capsules or neutron irradiation alone displayed mixed patterns of tumor growth. However, compared with the control group, the combination of boron capsules and neutron irradiation led to a significant 40-day growth delay. Remarkable inhibition of tumor growth was observed in mice treated with PEG-B-COF; however, the efficacy of the treatment varied among individual mice, indicating heterogeneity in the response (Figure 10C-D). This observation suggests that the release of an immune adjuvant induced by neutron irradiation may be crucial for achieving a comprehensive tumor treatment. Additionally, mice engrafted with the MC38 mouse tumor cell line exhibited a similar tumor regression effect when treated with the combination of boron capsules and neutron irradiation [97].

4.4 ^67/68Ga labeled BNCT tracers

⁶⁸Ga is produced using a generator system, which enables the efficient production of radiopharmaceuticals for PET imaging. PET imaging with ⁶⁸Ga offers high˗resolution images, allowing for the precise localization and characterization of abnormalities, thereby aiding in the disease detection and assessment of treatment response [98, 99]. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA is recognized as one of the most effective radiopharmaceuticals for prostate cancer [100]. Recently, a series of boron-installed PSMA˗based BNCT tracers, incorporating either carborane or boronic acid functional groups were synthesized. The three tracers were selected for further evaluation after the initial screening. Compounds 1a (boronic acid) and 1d (carborane) were selected as representative compounds based on their characteristics. Compound 1f was selected for its two carborane substituents, highest boron atom count (20), and favorable binding affinity (Figure 11A). All three compounds demonstrated high binding affinity to serum proteins and exhibited negligible cell toxicity. For the in vivo experiments, mice bearing 22Rv1 tumor xenograft were used in both the ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 blocking assay and boron biodistribution studies. The results were compared with those of BPA. Micro PET/CT images revealed tumor uptake of 0.119 ± 0.071, 0.117 ± 0.007, 0.564 ± 0.098, and 1.896 ± 0.408 %ID/g for compounds 1a, 1d, 1f, and BPA, respectively. The T/N and T/B ratios decreased with the administration of the inhibitor. At 4 hr postinjection, the most favorable outcomes were observed. Notably, compound 1d demonstrated a remarkable tumor boron uptake of 4.2 μg/g of tissue, approximately twice as high as the boron uptake in muscles (2.2 μg/g of tissue). These findings highlight the superior performance of compound 1d after 4 hr, indicating its potential use as an effective treatment agent. In the case of compound 1f, both at 4 and 1 hr, the tumor uptake was measured to be 3.4 μg/g of tissue, which was lower than the corresponding boron uptake in muscle (5.1 μg/g of tissue for both time points). Compounds 1d and 1f exhibited similar levels of boron uptake in the tumor as those of BPA. In vivo, the hydrophilic nature of compound 1a facilitated its rapid elimination through renal clearance, while simultaneously exhibiting strong binding to PSMA. However, despite the highest administered dose, compound 1a exhibited lower tumor boron uptake at 4 hr, may be attributed to its molecular structure, which consists of only a single boron atom per molecule. Overall, the tumor boron uptake did not meet the required levels (20˗50 μg/g) for effective BNCT, and the T/N ratio was below the desired selectivity (less than 3:1) [101]. In 2022, Ogawa and co˗workers developed closo˗dodecaborate installed cyclic RGD peptide (B-cRGD) for targeted and efficient tumor treatment through BNCT. To track the tracer in vivo, a DOTA chelator was incorporated for radiolabeling using ⁶⁷Ga (t_1/2 = 3 d), resulting in ⁶⁷Ga-B-cRGD.Additionally, iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) was introduced in to the closo˗dodecaborate moiety to synthesize ¹²⁵I-B-cRGD for comparison purposes (Figure 11B). In the in vitro experiment, both tracers exhibited significant uptake by U-87 MG human glioblastoma cells for up to 6h. Biodistribution studies were performed using a mouse model of U-87MG xenograft. Both tracers displayed high tumor uptake and rapid clearance from the healthy tissues. However, ¹²⁵I-B-cRGD demonstrated higher tumor uptake than that of ⁶⁷Ga-B-cRGD because of its higher binding capacity to albumin. This study did not provide information regarding the quantitative analysis of boron levels in target tissues or the evaluation of the treatment efficacy resulting from the application of thermal neutron irradiation [102].

5. SPECT Imaging of BNCT tracers

5.1 ¹²³I labeled BNCT tracers

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are considered as excellent platforms for selective delivery of anticancer drugs to tumors [103]. Previously, boron˗enriched AuNPs were synthesized and tested for successful BNCT treatment of tumors. However, there are still limitations in understanding the in vivo biodistribution, pharmacokinetics and T/B ratio using non˗invasive imaging techniques [104]. Recently, theranostic assemblies of AuNPs functionalized with boron cages (B-AuNPs) were developed and conjugated to an anti-HER2 antibody (61 IgG) to form 61-B-AuNPs. To investigate the cellular uptake in vitro and assess the pharmacokinetics in vivo using SPECT-CT imaging, radioactive iodine (¹²³I) was incorporated in to B-AuNPs or 61-B-AuNPs using copper-catalyzed click chemistry (Figure 12A-B) [105]. Over time, ¹²³I-61-B-AuNPs gradually increased the cellular uptake to a maximum level of 23.31 ± 4.84, 36 hr post-incubation. In contrast, ¹²³I-B-AuNPs showed limited uptake (0.97 ± 0.05) due to the absence of HER2-targeting antibodies. ¹²³I-61-B-AuNPs demonstrated improved cellular internalization over time, increasing from 10.53 ± 1.21% at 12 h to 15.40 ± 1.72% at 36 hr post-incubation, while ¹²³I-B-AuNPs was not internalized into the cells. SPECT/CT imaging of mice that were administrated with ¹²³I-61-B-AuNPs or¹²³I-B-AuNPs revealed a more noticeable accumulation of the former compound. The tumor uptakes for¹²³I-61-B-AuNPs and¹²³I-B-AuNPs were 48.32 ± 3.11 and 7.43 ± 0.28%ID/mL, respectively, at 12 h postinjection (Figure 12C). The mice injected with ¹²³I-61-B-AuNPs demonstrated a higher T/M ratio of 7.42 ± 0.61, in comparison to mice injected with ¹²³I-B-AuNPs (T/M ratio 1.34 ± 0.09). The intratumoral boron concentrations in mice injected with ¹²³I-61-B-AuNP and ¹²³I-B-AuNP were 217.1 ± 47.1 and 74.5 ± 6.0 μg/g, respectively. The pharmacokinetics and tumor accumulation of ¹²³I-61-B-AuNP, as demonstrated by SPECT-CT images were effectively correlated with the boron content in specific organs and tumors (Figure 12D). This suggests that imaging tracer based on AuNPs can be used to predict the treatment efficiency using BNCT.

Overall, PET and SPECT imaging technologies offer valuable solutions to address the challenges associated with BNCT. One significant concern in BNCT is the heterogeneous distribution of boron within and around the tumor, which leads to inaccuracies in the dose distribution.Moreover, incomplete excretion of the administrated dose from healthy tissues or excessive dose deposition in the tumor can potentially trigger secondary cancer [106]. To overcome these inherent limitations of BNCT, PET and SPECT provide promising alternatives by enabling precise quantification of boron uptake in tumors and neighboring healthy organs.

Recently, radiolabeling of BNCT tracers and the application of molecular imaging to study the in vivo chemical and pharmacological behavior have further enhanced this treatment procedure. However, it is important to note that most of the studies summarized in this review are based on preclinical data; thus, more comprehensive clinical studies are required to understand the potential of molecular imaging in combination with BNCT. At present, ¹⁸F-FBPA is being employed in clinical settings to assess boron distribution in patients [107-109], with the expectation that forthcoming radiolabeled BNCT tracers will be integrated into clinical research endeavors, further catalyzing the advancement of this therapeutic strategy.

6. Conclusion and future perspectives

The global cancer burden emphasizes the need for optimal, effective, and safe treatment modalities. BNCT has emerged as a promising approach; however, clinical practice primarily relies on the use of BPA, BSH, and their analogs, as boron˗delivery tracers. This has encouraged scientific interest in the exploration of new and improved tracers. The efficiency of BNCT depends upon several critical factors, including the pharmacokinetic behavior of the boron˗enriched tracer, its affinity for the tumor tissue, the spatial biodistribution of boron and the optimal timing for neutron irradiation. Innovative imaging techniques, such as PET or SPECT can be employed to ensure precise and noninvasive determination of boron content in tumors. Several radioisotopes, such as ¹⁸F, ⁶⁴Cu, ⁸⁹Zr, ⁶⁸Ga, and ¹²³I, have been used for radiolabeling and molecular imaging of BNCT tracers. This progress has enabled a comprehensive understanding of the in vivo behavior and targeting ability of the new tracers.

 Figure 10 

Schematic illustration of immune drug-loaded B-COF particles and preclinical studies. (A) Schematic representation of the synthesis of carborane-derived covalent organic framework (B˗COF) by the condensation of 1, 3, 5-tris (4-aminophenyl)-benzene (TAPB) and p-carborane-1, 10-phenyl-dialdehyde (B˗CHO) under an optimized condition. (B) PET/CT images of B16F10 tumor-bearing mice at an indicated time point after intratumoral injection of ⁸⁹Zr˗Boroncapsule (n=3). (C, D) Average tumor volume (mm³) (n = 6) of each group of mice utilizing various treatment processes calculated up to 40 days post treatment, ****p < 0.0001 with, (C) B16F10, and (D) MC38 xenograft. Adapted with permission from [97], copyright 2022, Springer Nature Limited.

 Figure 11 

Representative boron-installed radiolabeled PSMA and cyclic RGD agents. (A) Schematic illustration of selected boron installed PSMA agents 1a, 1d, and 1f. (B) Schematic illustration of boron-installed cyclic RGD peptide⁶⁷Ga-B-cRGD and ¹²⁵I-B-cRGD. Adapted with permission from [102], copyright 2022, American Chemical Society.

 Figure 12 

Representative images of ¹²³I-61-B-AuNPs and preclinical studies. (A) Schematic illustration of gold nanoparticles functionalized with boron cages (B-AuNPs). (B) B-AuNPs conjugated to anti-HER2 antibody (61IgG) to form 61-B-AuNPs and radiolabeled with ¹²³I to yield¹²³I-61-B-AuNPs. (C) SPECT/CT images of N87 xenograft-bearing mice intravenously injected with¹²³I-B-AuNPs or ¹²³I-61-B-AuNPs at 12 and 36 hr postinjection. (D) Correlation between the tumor-to-muscle ration obtained from biodistribution studies using gamma counter and that derived from boron content determined by ICPMS (R² = 0.8519, p < 0.05). Adapted with permission from [105], copyright 2019, Elsevier B.V.

Radiolabeling of BNCT tracers shows tremendous potential for accurately quantifying boron in tumors. However, there is an urgent need for developing novel radiolabeled BNCT tracers to improve pharmacokinetics, enhance treatment precision, and reduce potential risks of secondary cancer. Additionally, exploring innovative targeted drug delivery systems can increase the concentration of boron in the tumor tissues while sparing the healthy organs; thus, maximizing the treatment effectiveness. In-depth radiobiological studies are required to better understand the interaction between boron and thermal neutron radiation, as well as the mechanism governing secondary cancer formation. Furthermore, conducting comprehensive evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of PET and SPECT imaging in BNCT compared to other treatment modalities hold significant promise in guiding healthcare policies and resource allocation decisions. Designing robust guidelines and criteria for patient selection and incorporating molecular imaging assessments are critical aspects that can significantly improve treatment outcomes and resource utilization. Looking ahead, extensive research on long-term patient monitoring using PET or SPECT imaging coupled with comprehensive clinical studies to validate the efficiency and safety of new BNCT tracers are vital for advancing the field and implementing this cutting-edge technology in cancer care. By focusing research efforts on these well-structured paths, the integration of PET and SPECT imaging into BNCT holds the potential to revolutionize personalized and effective cancer treatments.

Abbreviations

AuNPs: gold nanoparticles; B-CDs: boron-rich carbon dots; B-COF: carborane-based covalent organic framework; BNCT: boron neutron capture therapy; BoPs: boronated phospholipids; BPA: (L)-4-dihydroxy-borophenylalanine; BPNs: boronated porphyrin nanoparticles; BSH: sodium mercaptoundecahydro-closo-dodecaborate; COF: covalent organic frameworks; COPs: covalent organic polymers; DSPE-PEG: 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[amino-(polyethyleneglycol)-2000]; EPR: enhanced permeability and retention; FBY: fluoroboronotyrosine; FDG: fluorodeoxyglucose; L-BPA: structural analog of boronophenylalanine; LET: linear energy transfer; mAb: monoclonal antibody; PET: positron emission tomography; SPECT: single-photon emission computed tomography; T/B: tumor-to-blood; T/N: tumor-to-normal; TCO: trans-cyclooctene; Tz-AuNPs: tetrazine-installed boron-enriched gold nanoparticles.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KIRAMS), funded by MSIT, Republic of Korea (No. 50462-2023).

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. Hawthorne MF. The role of chemistry in the development of boron neutron capture therapy of cancer. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1993;32(7):950-84

2. Barth RF, Coderre JA, Vicente MG, Blue TE. Boron neutron capture therapy of cancer: current status and future prospects. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(11):3987-4002

3. Lakshminarayana G, Kebaili I, Dong MG, Al-Buriahi MS, Dahshan A, Kityk IV. et al. Estimation of gamma-rays, and fast and the thermal neutrons attenuation characteristics for bismuth tellurite and bismuth boro-tellurite glass systems. J Mater Sci. 2020;55:5750-71

4. Rose PB, Erickson AS, Mayer M, Nattress J, Jovanovic I. Uncovering special nuclear materials by low-energy nuclear reaction imaging. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1-8

5. Hirase S, Aoki A, Hattori Y, Morimoto K, Noguchi K, Fujii I. et al. Dodecaborate-encapsulated extracellular vesicles with modification of cell-penetrating peptides for enhancing macropinocytotic cellular uptake and biological activity in boron neutron capture therapy. Mol Pharm. 2022;19(4):1135-45

6. Kinashi Y, Takahashi S, Kashino G, Okayasu R, Masunaga S, Suzuki M. et al. DNA double-strand break induction in Ku80-deficient CHO cells following boron neutron capture reaction. Radiat Oncol. 2011;6(1):1-8

7. Schwint AE, Monti Hughes A, Garabalino MA, Santa Cruz GA, González SJ, Longhino J. et al. Clinical veterinary boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) studies in dogs with head and neck cancer: Bridging the gap between translational and clinical studies. Biology. 2020;9(10):327

8. Qi P, Chen Q, Tu D, Yao S, Zhang Y, Wang J. et al. The potential role of borophene as a radiosensitizer in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) and particle therapy (PT). Biomater Sci. 2020;8(10):2778-85

9. Evangelista L, Jori G, Martini D, Sotti G. Boron neutron capture therapy and (18)F-labeled borophenylalanine positron emission tomography: A critical and clinical overview of the literature. Appl Radiat Isot. 2013;74:91-101

10. Miyatake SI, Kawabata S, Kajimoto Y, Aoki A, Yokoyama K, Yamada M. et al. Modified boron neutron capture therapy for malignant gliomas performed using epithermal neutron and two boron compounds with different accumulation mechanisms: an efficacy study based on findings on neuroimages. J Neurosurg. 2005;103(6):1000-9

11. Yamamoto T, Matsumura A, Nakai K, Shibata Y, Endo K, Sakurai F. et al. Current clinical results of the Tsukuba BNCT trial. Appl Radiat Isot. 2004;61(5):1089-93

12. Kankaanranta L, Seppala T, Valimaki P, Beule A, Collan J, Kortesniemi M. et al. L-boronophenylalanine-mediated boron neutron capture therapy for glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocy-toma progressing after external beam radiation therapy: A Phase I study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80(2):369-76

13. Barth RF, Kabalka GW, Yang W, Huo T, Nakkula RJ, Shaikh AL. et al. Evaluation of unnatural cyclic amino acids as boron delivery agents for treatment of melanomas and gliomas. Appl Radiat Isot. 2014;88:38-42

14. Barth RF, Yang W, Wu G, Swindall M, Byun Y, Narayanasamy S. et al. Thymidine kinase 1 as a molecular target for boron neutron capture therapy of brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(45):17493-7

15. Smilowitz HM, Slatkin DN, Micca PL, Miura M. Microlocalization of lipophilic porphyrins: Non-toxic enhancers of boron neutron-capture therapy. Int J Radiat Biol. 2013;89(8):611-7

16. Kawabata S, Yang W, Barth RF, Wu G, Huo T, Binns PJ. et al. Convection enhanced delivery of carboranylporphyrins for neutron capture therapy of brain tumors. J Neuro-Oncol. 2011;103:175-85

17. Ozawa T, Afzal J, Lamborn KR, Bollen AW, Bauer WF, Koo MS. et al. Toxicity, biodistribution, and convection-enhanced delivery of the boronated porphyrin BOPP in the 9L intracerebral rat glioma model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63(1):247-52

18. Shi Y, Li J, Zhang Z, Duan D, Zhang Z, Liu H. et al. Tracing boron with fluorescence and positron emission tomography imaging of boronated porphyrin nanocomplex for imaging-guided boron neutron capture therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(50):43387-95

19. Barth RF, Yang W, Adams DM, Rotaru JH, Shukla S, Sekido M. et al. Molecular targeting of the epidermal growth factor receptor for neutron capture therapy of gliomas. Cancer Res. 2002;62(11):3159-66

20. Miyabe J, Ohgaki R, Saito K, Wei L, Quan L, Jin C. et al. Boron delivery for boron neutron capture therapy targeting a cancer-upregulated oligopeptide transporter. J Pharmacol Sci. 2019;139(3):215-22

21. Wu G, Yang W, Barth RF, Kawabata S, Swindall M, Bandyopadhyaya AK. et al. Molecular targeting and treatment of an epidermal growth factor receptor-positive glioma using boronated cetuximab. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(4):1260-8

22. Yang W, Barth RF, Wu G, Kawabata S, Sferra TJ, Bandyopadhyaya AK. et al. Molecular targeting and treatment of EGFRvIII-positive gliomas using boronated monoclonal antibody L8A4. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(12):3792-802

23. Maruyama K, Ishida O, Kasaoka S, Takizawa T, Utoguchi N, Shinohara A. et al. Intracellular targeting of sodium mercaptoundecahydrododecaborate (BSH) to solid tumors by transferrin-PEG liposomes, for boron neutron-capture therapy (BNCT). J Control Release. 2004;98(2):195-207

24. Kueffer PJ, Maitz CA, Khan AA, Schuster SA, Shlyakhtina NI, Jalisatgi SS. et al. Boron neutron capture therapy demonstrated in mice bearing EMT6 tumors following selective delivery of boron by rationally designed liposomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(16):6512-7

25. Takeuchi I, Nomura K, Makino K. Hydrophobic boron compound-loaded poly (l-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles for boron neutron capture therapy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;159:360-5

26. Mi P, Yanagie H, Dewi N, Yen HC, Liu X, Suzuki M. et al. Block copolymer-boron cluster conjugate for effective boron neutron capture therapy of solid tumors. J Control Release. 2017;254:1-9

27. Kuthala N, Vankayala R, Li YN, Chiang CS, Hwang KC. Engineering novel targeted boron-10-enriched theranostic nanomedicine to combat against murine brain tumors via MR imaging-guided boron neutron capture therapy. Adv Mater. 2017;29(31):1700850

28. Yinghuai Z, Peng AT, Carpenter K, Maguire JA, Hosmane NS, Takagaki M. Substituted carborane-appended water-soluble single-wall carbon nanotubes: new approach to boron neutron capture therapy drug delivery. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127(27):9875-80

29. Ciofani G, Raffa V, Menciassi A, Cuschieri A. Folate functionalized boron nitride nanotubes and their selective uptake by glioblastoma multiforme cells: implications for their use as boron carriers in clinical boron neutron capture therapy. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2009;4:113-21

30. Achilli C, Grandi S, Ciana A, Guidetti GF, Malara A, Abbonante V. et al. Biocompatibility of functionalized boron phosphate (BPO₄) nanoparticles for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) application. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine. 2014;10(3):589-97

31. González SJ, Cruz GA. The photon-isoeffective dose in boron neutron capture therapy. Radiat Res. 2012;178(6):609-21

32. Chou FI, Chung HP, Liu HM, Chi CW, Lui WY. Suitability of boron carriers for BNCT: Accumulation of boron in malignant and normal liver cells after treatment with BPA, BSH and BA. Appl Radiat Isot. 2009;67(7-8):S105-8

33. Ceberg CP, Brun A, Kahl SB, Koo MS, Persson BR, Salford LG. A comparative study on the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of boronated porphyrin (BOPP) and sulfhydryl boron hydride (BSH) in the RG2 rat glioma model. J Neurosurg. 1995;83(1):86-92

34. Wittig A, Michel J, Moss RL, Stecher-Rasmussen F, Arlinghaus HF, Bendel P. et al. Boron analysis and boron imaging in biological materials for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008;68(1):66-90

35. Willmann JK, Van Bruggen N, Dinkelborg LM, Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging in drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7(7):591-607

36. Schillaci O, Urbano N. Digital PET/CT: a new intriguing chance for clinical nuclear medicine and personalized molecular imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(6):1222-5

37. Sanaat A, Arabi H, Mainta I, Garibotto V, Zaidi H. Projection space implementation of deep learning-guided low-dose brain PET imaging improves performance over implementation in image space. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(9):1388-96

38. Van Sluis J, Boellaard R, Dierckx RA, Stormezand GN, Glaudemans AW, Noordzij W. Image quality and activity optimization in oncologic (18)F-FDG PET using the digital biograph vision PET/CT system. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(5):764-71

39. Kaneta T. PET and SPECT imaging of the brain: a review on the current status of nuclear medicine in Japan. Japanese J Radiol. 2020;38(4):343-57

40. Ritt P. Recent developments in SPECT/CT. Semin Nucl Med. 2022;52(1):6-14

41. Matsumoto Y, Fukumitsu N, Ishikawa H, Nakai K, Sakurai H. A critical review of radiation therapy: From particle beam therapy (proton, carbon, and BNCT) to beyond. J Pers Med. 2021;11(8):825

42. Pitto-Barry A. Polymers and boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT): A potent combination. Polym Chem. 2021;12(14):2035-44

43. Dai Q, Yang Q, Bao X, Chen J, Han M, Wei Q. The development of boron analysis and imaging in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). Mol Pharm. 2022;19(2):363-77

44. Novopashina DS, Vorobyeva MA, Venyaminova A. Recent advances in the synthesis of high boron-loaded nucleic acids for BNCT. Front Chem. 2021;9:619052

45. Seneviratne D, Advani P, Trifiletti DM, Chumsri S, Beltran CJ, Bush AF, Vallow LA. Exploring the Biological and Physical Basis of Boron Neutron Capture Therapy (BNCT) as a Promising Treatment Frontier in Breast Cancer. Cancers. 2022;14(12):3009

46. He H, Li J, Jiang P, Tian S, Wang H, Fan R. et al. The basis and advances in clinical application of boron neutron capture therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2021;16:1-8

47. Seneviratne DS, Saifi O, Mackeyev Y, Malouff T, Krishnan S. Next-Generation Boron Drugs and Rational Translational Studies Driving the Revival of BNCT. Cells. 2023;12(10):1398

48. Nakashima H. The New Generation of Particle Therapy Focused on Boron Element (Boron Neutron Capture Therapy; BNCT)-The World's First Approved BNCT Drug. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2022;142(2):155-64

49. Malouff TD, Seneviratne DS, Ebner DK, Stross WC, Waddle MR, Trifiletti DM, Krishnan S. Boron neutron capture therapy: A review of clinical applications. Front Oncol. 2021;11:601820

50. Yoshimoto M, Kurihara H, Honda N, Kawai K, Ohe K, Fujii H, Itami J, Arai Y. Predominant contribution of L-type amino acid transporter to 4-borono-2-18F-fluoro-phenylalanine uptake in human glioblastoma cells. Nucl Med Biol. 2013;40(5):625-9

51. Gona KB, Gómez-Vallejo V, Padro D, Llop J. [18F] Fluorination of o-carborane via nucleophilic substitution: towards a versatile platform for the preparation of 18F-labeled BNCT drug candidates. Chem Comm. 2013;49(98):11491-3

52. Lamba M, Goswami A, Bandyopadhyay A. A periodic development of BPA and BSH based derivatives in boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). Chem Comm. 2021;57(7):827-39

53. Tan HY, Yeong CH, Wong YH, McKenzie M, Kasbollah A, Shah MN, Perkins AC. Neutron-activated theranostic radionuclides for nuclear medicine. Nucl Med Biol. 2020;90:55-68

54. Mushtaq S, Yun SJ, Jeon J. Recent advances in bioorthogonal click chemistry for efficient synthesis of radiotracers and radiopharmaceuticals. Molecules. 2019;24(19):3567

55. Zhong X, Yan J, Ding X, Su C, Xu Y, Yang M. Recent advances in bioorthogonal click chemistry for enhanced PET and SPECT radiochemistry. Bioconjug Chem. 2023;34(3):457-76

56. Wang M, Svatunek D, Rohlfing K, Liu Y, Wang H, Giglio B, Yuan H, Wu Z, Li Z, Fox J. Conformationally strained trans-cyclooctene (sTCO) enables the rapid construction of 18F-PET probes via tetrazine ligation. Theranostics. 2016;6(6):887

57. Sarrett SM, Keinänen O, Dayts EJ, Dewaele-Le Roi G, Rodriguez C, Carnazza KE, Zeglis BM. Inverse electron demand Diels-Alder click chemistry for pretargeted PET imaging and radioimmunotherapy. Nat Protoc. 2021;16(7):3348-81

58. Catafau AM, Bullich S. Molecular imaging PET and SPECT approaches for improving productivity of antipsychotic drug discovery and development. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20(3):378-88

59. Garcia EV. Physical attributes, limitations, and future potential for PET and SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:19-29

60. Murakami T, Fujimoto H, Inagaki N. Non-invasive beta-cell imaging: Visualization, quantification, and beyond. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:714348

61. Ainslie-McLaren G, Fee A, McKinstray J, Lee AB, Bolster AA. Red cell volume measurement-using indium as a replacement for chromium. Nucl Med Commun. 2020;41(6):589-96

62. Madsen MT. Recent advances in SPECT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(4):661-73

63. Soderlund AT, Chaal J, Tjio G, Totman JJ, Conti M, Townsend DW. Beyond 18F-FDG: characterization of PET/CT and PET/MR scanners for a comprehensive set of positron emitters of growing application-(18)F, (11)C, (89)Zr, (124)I, (68)Ga, and (90)Y. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(8):1285-91

64. Basu S, Kwee TC, Surti S, Akin EA, Yoo D, Alavi A. Fundamentals of PET and PET/CT imaging. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1228(1):1-8

65. Hicks RJ, Hofman MS. Is there still a role for SPECT-CT in oncology in the PET-CT era?. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9(12):712-20

66. Meikle SR, Beekman FJ, Rose SE. Complementary molecular imaging technologies: High resolution SPECT, PET and MRI. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2006;3(2):187-94

67. Mehta SC, Lu DR. Targeted drug delivery for boron neutron capture therapy. Pharm Res. 1996;13:344-51

68. Farhood B, Samadian H, Ghorbani M, Zakariaee SS, Knaup C. Physical, dosimetric and clinical aspects and delivery systems in neutron capture therapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018;23(5):462-73

69. Vähätalo JK, Eskola O, Bergman J, Forsback S, Lehikoinen P, Jääskeläinen J, Solin O. Synthesis of 4-dihydroxyboryl-2-[18F] fluorophenylalanine with relatively high-specific activity. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2002;45(8):697-704

70. Ishiwata K, Ido T, Mejia AA, Ichihashi M, Mishima Y. Synthesis and radiation dosimetry of 4-borono-2-[18F] fluoro-D, L-phenylalanine: a target compound for PET and boron neutron capture therapy. Int J Radiat Appl Instrum Part A. Appl Radiat Isot. 1991;42(4):325-8

71. Kabalka GW, Smith GT, Dyke JP, Reid WS, Longford CD, Roberts TG, Reddy NK, Buonocore E, Hübner KF. Evaluation of fluorine-(18)-BPA-fructose for boron neutron capture treatment planning. J Nucl Med. 1997;38(11):1762-7

72. Imahori Y, Ueda S, Ohmori Y, Sakae K, Kusuki T, Kobayashi T, Takagaki M, Ono K, Ido T, Fujii R. Positron emission tomography-based boron neutron capture therapy using boronophenylalanine for high-grade gliomas: part II. Clin Cancer Res. 1998;4(8):1833-41

73. He J, Yan H, Du Y, Ji Y, Cai F, Fan W, Huo L, Liu YH, Wang Z, Li S. Nucleophilic radiosynthesis of boron neutron capture therapy-oriented PET probe [18F] FBPA using aryldiboron precursors. Chem Commun. 2021;57(71):8953-6

74. Liu Z, Chao D, Li Y, Ting R, Oh J, Perrin DM. From minutes to years: predicting organotrifluoroborate solvolysis rates. Chem Eur J. 2015;21(10):3924-8

75. Li J, Shi Y, Zhang Z, Liu H, Lang L, Liu T, Chen X, Liu Z. A metabolically stable boron-derived tyrosine serves as a theranostic agent for positron emission tomography guided boron neutron capture therapy. Bioconjug Chem. 2019;30(11):2870-8

76. Li Z, Kong Z, Chen J, Li J, Li N, Yang Z, Wang Y, Liu Z. (18)F-Boramino acid PET/CT in healthy volunteers and glioma patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;15:1-9

77. Confalonieri L, Imperio D, Erhard A, Fallarini S, Compostella F, Del Grosso E, Balcerzyk M, Panza L. Organotrifluoroborate Sugar Conjugates for a Guided Boron Neutron Capture Therapy: From Synthesis to Positron Emission Tomography. ACS Omega. 2022;7(51):48340-8

78. Yeh CN, Chang CW, Chung YH, Tien SW, Chen YR, Chen TW, Huang YC, Wang HE, Chou YC, Chen MH, Chiang KC. Synthesis and characterization of boron fenbufen and its F-(18) labeled homolog for boron neutron capture therapy of COX-2 overexpressed cholangiocarcinoma. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2017;107:217-29

79. Jalilian AR, Osso Jr J. The current status and future of theranostic Copper-(64) radiopharmaceuticals. Iran J Nucl Med. 2017;25(1):1

80. Iguchi Y, Michiue H, Kitamatsu M, Hayashi Y, Takenaka F, Nishiki TI, Matsui H. Tumor-specific delivery of BSH-3R for boron neutron capture therapy and positron emission tomography imaging in a mouse brain tumor model. Biomaterials. 2015;56:10-7

81. Huang H, Song W, Rieffel J, Lovell JF. Emerging applications of porphyrins in photomedicine. Front Phys. 2015;3:23

82. Jones LM, Dunham D, Rennie MY, Kirman J, Lopez AJ, Keim KC, Little W, Gomez A, Bourke J, Ng H, DaCosta RS. In vitro detection of porphyrin-producing wound bacteria with real-time fluorescence imaging. Future Microbiol. 2020;15(5):319-32

83. Tsolekile N, Nelana S, Oluwafemi OS. Porphyrin as diagnostic and therapeutic agent. Molecules. 2019;24(14):2669

84. Koo MS, Ozawa T, Santos RA, Lamborn KR, Bollen AW, Deen DF, Kahl SB. Synthesis and comparative toxicology of a series of polyhedral borane anion-substituted tetraphenyl porphyrins. J Med Chem. 2007;50(4):820-7

85. Shi Y, Li J, Zhang Z, Duan D, Zhang Z, Liu H, Liu T, Liu Z. Tracing boron with fluorescence and PET imaging of boronated porphyrin nanocomplex for imaging guided boron neutron capture therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(50):43387-95

86. Shi Y, Fu Q, Li J, Liu H, Zhang Z, Liu T, Liu Z. Covalent organic polymer as a carborane carrier for imaging-facilitated boron neutron capture therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(50):55564-73

87. Feiner IV, Pulagam KR, Gómez-Vallejo V, Zamacola K, Baz Z, Caffarel MM, Lawrie CH, Ruiz-de-Angulo A, Carril M, Llop J. Therapeutic pretargeting with gold nanoparticles as drug candidates for boron neutron capture therapy. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization. 2020;37(12):2000200

88. Wang Y, Xu Y, Yang J, Qiu X, Li N, Zhu Y, Yan L, Li W, Huang X, Liang K, Guo R. Carborane based mesoporous nanoparticles as a potential agent for BNCT. Materials Chemistry Frontiers. 2021;5(6):2771-6

89. Li J, Sun Q, Lu C, Xiao H, Guo Z, Duan D, Zhang Z, Liu T, Liu Z. Boron encapsulated in a liposome can be used for combinational neutron capture therapy. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):2143

90. Mirzaei D, Miri-Hakimabad H, Rafat-Motavalli L. Depth dose evaluation for prostate cancer treatment using boron neutron capture therapy. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2014;302:1095-101

91. Meher N, Seo K, Wang S, Bidkar AP, Fogarty M, Dhrona S, Huang X, Tang R, Blaha C, Evans MJ, Raleigh DR. Synthesis and preliminary biological assessment of carborane-loaded theranostic nanoparticles to target prostate-specific membrane antigen. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(46):54739-52

92. Verel I, Visser GW, Boellaard R, Stigter-van Walsum M, Snow GB, Van Dongen GA. 89Zr immuno-PET: comprehensive procedures for the production of 89Zr-labeled monoclonal antibodies. J Nucl Med. 2003;44(8):1271-81

93. Feiner IV, Pulagam KR, Uribe KB, Passannante R, Simó C, Zamacola K, Gómez-Vallejo V, Herrero-Álvarez N, Cossío U, Baz Z, Caffarel MM. Pre-targeting with ultra-small nanoparticles: Boron carbon dots as drug candidates for boron neutron capture therapy. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9(2):410-20

94. Xiong H, Zhou D, Qi Y, Zhang Z, Xie Z, Chen X, Jing X, Meng F, Huang Y. Doxorubicin-loaded carborane-conjugated polymeric nanoparticles as delivery system for combination cancer therapy. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16(12):3980-8

95. An J, Geib SJ, Rosi NL. Cation-triggered drug release from a porous zinc-adeninate metal-organic framework. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(24):8376-7

96. Li M, Peng Y, Yan F, Li C, He Y, Lou Y, Ma D, Li Y, Shi Z, Feng S. A cage-based covalent organic framework for drug delivery. New J Chem. 2021;45(6):3343-8

97. Shi Y, Guo Z, Fu Q, Shen X, Zhang Z, Sun W, Wang J, Sun J, Zhang Z, Liu T, Gu Z. Localized nuclear reaction breaks boron drug capsules loaded with immune adjuvants for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1884

98. Zhernosekov KP, Filosofov DV, Baum RP, Aschoff P, Bihl H, Razbash AA, Jahn M, Jennewein M, Rösch F. Processing of generator-produced 68Ga for medical application. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(10):1741-8

99. Kesch C, Kratochwil C, Mier W, Kopka K, Giesel FL. (68)Ga or (18)F for prostate cancer imaging?. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(5):687-8

100. Han S, Woo S, Kim YJ, Suh CH. Impact of (68)Ga-PSMA PET on the management of patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2018;74(2):179-90

101. Wang S, Blaha C, Santos R, Huynh T, Hayes TR, Beckford-Vera DR, Blecha JE, Hong AS, Fogarty M, Hope TA, Raleigh DR. Synthesis and initial biological evaluation of boron-containing prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands for treatment of prostate cancer using boron neutron capture therapy. Mol Pharm. 2019;16(9):3831-41

102. Mishiro K, Imai S, Ematsu Y, Hirose K, Fuchigami T, Munekane M, Kinuya S, Ogawa K. RGD Peptide-Conjugated Dodecaborate with the Ga-DOTA Complex: A Preliminary Study for the Development of Theranostic Agents for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy and Its Companion Diagnostics. J Med Chem. 2022;65(24):16741-53

103. Duncan B, Kim C, Rotello VM. Gold nanoparticle platforms as drug and biomacromolecule delivery systems. J Control Release. 2010;148(1):122-7

104. Pulagam KR, Gona KB, Gómez-Vallejo V, Meijer J, Zilberfain C, Estrela-Lopis I, Baz Z, Cossío U, Llop J. Gold nanoparticles as boron carriers for boron neutron capture therapy: Synthesis, radiolabelling and in vivo evaluation. Molecules. 2019;24(19):3609

105. Wu CY, Lin JJ, Chang WY, Hsieh CY, Wu CC, Chen HS, Hsu HJ, Yang AS, Hsu MH, Kuo WY. Development of theranostic active-targeting boron-containing gold nanoparticles for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019;183:110387

106. Xiang M, Chang DT, Pollom EL. Second cancer risk after primary cancer treatment with three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, or proton beam radiation therapy. Cancer. 2020;126(15):3560-8

107. Liao CY, Jen JH, Chen YW, Li CY, Wang LW, Liu RS, Huang WS, Lu CF. Comparison of Conventional and Radiomic Features between 18F-FBPA PET/CT and PET/MR. Biomolecules. 2021;11(11):1659

108. Watabe T, Shimamoto H, Naka S, Kamiya T, Murakami S. 18F-FBPA PET in Sarcoidosis: Comparison to Inflammation-Related Uptake on FDG PET. Clin Nucl Med. 2020;45(11):863-4

109. Imahori Y, Ueda S, Ohmori Y, Kusuki T, Ono K, Fujii R, Ido T. Fluorine-18-labeled fluoroboronophenylalanine PET in patients with glioma. J Nucl Med. 1998;39(2):325-33

Author contact

Corresponding author: Sajid Mushtaq, Division of RI-Applied Research, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences (KIRAMS) Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea. Telephone number: +02-970-1660; Fax number: +02-970-1341; E-mail address: sajidmushtaqedu.pk.

Received 2023-8-9
Accepted 2023-9-15
Published 2023-9-25

Citation styles

©2024 Ivyspring International Publisher. Terms of use