PDF

Theranostics 2019; 9(23):7088-7098. doi:10.7150/thno.34895 This issue Cite

Research Paper

Ultrasound and Microbubble-targeted Delivery of a microRNA Inhibitor to the Heart Suppresses Cardiac Hypertrophy and Preserves Cardiac Function

Jonathan A. Kopechek^1,2, Charles F. McTiernan¹, Xucai Chen¹, Jianhui Zhu¹, Maureen Mburu¹, Rafey Feroze¹, Daniel A. Whitehurst¹, Linda Lavery¹, Jissy Cyriac¹, Flordeliza S. Villanueva¹

1. Center for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Heart and Vascular Institute, Pittsburgh Heart, Lung, Blood and Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
2. Dept. of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA

✉ Corresponding author: Flordeliza S. Villanueva, M.D. Center for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics. University of Pittsburgh. Presbyterian University Hospital. South Tower E354.4, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Phone: (412) 647-5840. Fax: (412) 624-2264. E-mail: villanuevafsedu More

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRs) are dysregulated in pathological left ventricular hypertrophy. AntimiR inhibition of miR-23a suppressed hypertension-induced cardiac hypertrophy in preclinical models, but clinical translation is limited by a lack of cardiac-targeted delivery systems. Ultrasound-targeted microbubble cavitation (UTMC) utilizes microbubbles as nucleic acid carriers to target delivery of molecular therapeutics to the heart. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of UTMC targeted delivery of antimiR-23a to the hearts of mice for suppression of hypertension-induced cardiac hypertrophy.

Methods: Cationic lipid microbubbles were loaded with 300 pmol negative control antimiR (NC) or antimiR-23a. Mice received continuous phenylephrine infusion via implanted osmotic minipumps, then UTMC treatments with intravenously injected antimiR-loaded microbubbles 0, 3, and 7 days later. At 2 weeks, hearts were harvested and miR-23a levels were measured. Left ventricular (LV) mass and function were assessed with echocardiography.

Results: UTMC treatment with antimiR-23a decreased cardiac miR-23a levels by 41 ± 8% compared to UTMC + antimiR-NC controls (p < 0.01). Furthermore, LV mass after 1 week of phenylephrine treatment was 17 ± 10% lower following UTMC + antimiR-23a treatment compared to UTMC + antimiR-NC controls (p = 0.02). At 2 weeks, fractional shortening was 23% higher in the UTMC + antimiR-23a mice compared to UTMC + antimiR-NC controls (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: UTMC is an effective technique for targeted functional delivery of antimiRs to the heart causing suppression of cardiac hypertrophy and preservation of systolic function. This approach could represent a revolutionary therapy for patients suffering from pathological cardiac hypertrophy and other cardiovascular conditions.

Keywords: Cardiac hypertrophy, Ultrasound targeted microbubble cavitation, miRNA delivery

Introduction

Pathological left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), such as occurs in hypertensive heart disease, is associated with an increased risk of heart failure and other cardiovascular complications [1-8]. Pathological LVH is characterized by significant changes in gene expression which lead to ventricular remodeling [9]. The mechanisms by which pathological LVH confers increased cardiovascular risks are complex, and may include increased susceptibility to myocardial ischemia due to reduced capillary density, impaired flow reserve, endocardial capillary compression, and/or electrical remodeling [10-13]. Compared to the development or persistence of LVH [14, 15], prevention or regression of LVH is clinically associated with improved LV systolic performance and reduced risk of cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, sudden death). Anti-hypertensive medications have some effect on pathological LVH: a meta-analysis found that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers reduced LV mass by 10% and 13%, respectively [16, 17]. However, these medications can cause side effects [18, 19] and are not uniformly effective, underscoring the need for new therapies to mitigate the development of LVH.

Dysregulation of microRNA (miRNA) activity has been shown to play an important role in the development of cardiovascular conditions such as LVH, and therapeutic modulation of miRNA levels in the heart has generated interest for treatment of various cardiovascular diseases [20, 21]. miRNAs are short (~22 nucleotides), non-coding, endogenous RNAs that regulate multiple genes and target multiple signaling pathways by binding target mRNA sequences to inhibit translation or induce mRNA degradation [21]. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that levels of miRNAs are dynamically altered in the heart under pathological conditions, including hypertrophy, and studies of failing human hearts detected significant changes in levels of specific miRNAs compared to normal hearts [22-24]. One particular miRNA, miR-23a, was found to be significantly upregulated in human hearts with ischemic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, or aortic stenosis, and among the earliest miRNAs to be upregulated following aortic banding in rat hearts [23, 25]. Preclinical studies found that miR-23a promotes hypertrophy by upregulating the calcineurin/NFAT pathway and through inhibition of ubiquitin proteolysis via factors such as MuRF1, regulation of transcription factors such as Foxo3a, and downregulation of anti-oxidant enzymes such as MnSOD [26, 27]. Inhibition of miR-23a using an antimiR suppressed cardiac hypertrophy in mice with pressure overload or hypertension-induced hypertrophy [26, 27]. AntimiRs have also shown promise for treatment of other diseases and are in clinical trials for treatment of hepatitis C [28]. However, systemic administration of miRNA therapeutics such as antimiRs requires high doses and can adversely affect miRNA levels in off-target organs [21, 29, 30].

To address limitations with systemic antimiR delivery, we have developed a novel approach to locally deliver RNA therapeutics with ultrasound targeted microbubble cavitation (UTMC). This platform utilizes a multi-purpose gas-filled microsphere (microbubble) which carries the therapeutic on the shell, serves as an ultrasound imaging contrast agent, and can facilitate trans-membrane transport of drugs and genes in response to ultrasound [31-33]. As intravenously injected microbubbles transit though the microcirculation of the target tissue, ultrasound directed at the target tissue causes microbubble destruction or cavitation and payload release, and enhances vascular permeability and cell membrane permeability only at the target site [34-36]. This approach allows for repeated administration of targeted molecular therapeutics without the use of viral vectors. Previous studies by us and others have demonstrated the efficacy of UTMC for delivery of transcription factors, siRNA, and plasmids to the heart and other tissues [37-40].

We previously loaded luciferase siRNA onto cationic lipid-coated microbubbles and demonstrated cardiac delivery with UTMC in mice with cardiac-restricted luciferase expression [40]. In addition, other studies have explored UTMC delivery of miRNA mimics to cardiomyocytes in vitro and accumulation of fluorescent antimiRs in mouse hearts following UTMC [41-43]. However, the functional effects of therapeutic antimiR delivery via UTMC have not been previously described in a preclinical model of cardiac disease. Therefore, we hypothesized that UTMC could target delivery of antimiR-23a to cardiomyocytes, knock down miR-23a levels, suppress cardiac hypertrophy, and preserve cardiac function. Studies were initially performed in cultured murine cardiomyocytes in vitro, followed by in vivo experiments in a murine model of hypertension-induced LVH.

Methods

Experimental animals

All animal procedures conformed to NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Pittsburgh. A total of 22 male C57/BL6 mice were used for this study. For all surgical procedures, mice were anesthetized using 2-3% inhaled isoflurane and the depth of anesthesia was monitored by toe pinch response. All mice were euthanized by resection of the heart and decapitation under deep isoflurane anesthesia (5%).

Isolation of cardiomyocytes

Neonatal ventricular cardiomyocytes were isolated from the hearts of 1-2 day old Sprague-Dawley rats following manufacturer's directions with the Neonatal Cardiomyocyte Isolation System (Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ, USA). Cardiomyocytes were cultured on plates coated with 10 µg/cm² rat tail collagen (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). All cell studies were initiated 48 h after isolation. Myosin staining of the cells indicated that the cardiomyocyte purity was above 80% (Figure 1A).

AntimiR-loaded microbubble preparation and characterization

LNA-modified antimiRs were obtained from Exiqon (Copenhagen, Denmark). The sequence and structure are illustrated in Figure 1B. The sequence of “antimiR-23a” (with LNA-modified bases underlined) was GGAAATCCCTGGCAATGTGAT. The sequence of the negative control antimiR, “antimiR-NC”, was CAGTACTTTTGTGTAGTACAA.

Cationic microbubbles were synthesized as previously described [39, 40]. Lipids were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA) and polyethylene glycol-40 (PEG-40) stearate was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Lipids and PEG-40 were dissolved in chloroform at a molar ratio of 100:43:1:4.5 of 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPE), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-ethylphosphocholine (DSEPC), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoglycerol (DSPG), and PEG-40. The solution was dried with argon and resuspended at 1 mg/mL in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 1 mM EDTA, followed by sonication (Misonix, Farmingdale, NY, USA) to disperse the lipids. The lipid solution was diluted 1:4 in PBS (with 1 mM EDTA) to a volume of 800 µL, and 10 μg of antimiR-23a or antimiR-NC was added. The solution was placed in a sealed glass vial and the head space was filled with perfluorobutane gas (FluoroMed, Round Rock, TX, USA), followed by amalgamation (VialMix, Bristol Myers-Squibb, New York, NY, USA) to form lipid encapsulated perfluorobutane gas-filled microbubbles loaded with antimiRs via charge-charge interactions with the cationic lipid membrane (Figure 1C). AntimiR-loaded microbubbles were washed in PBS three times with centrifugation at 50g to remove unbound antimiR and lipids, and resuspended in a final volume of 0.5 mL. The resulting antimiR-loaded microbubble suspension contained approximately 2×10⁹ microbubbles/mL with a mean diameter of 2.0±0.1 μm (Figure 1D) as measured by a Coulter Multisizer 3 (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA). Loading of antimiR-23a on microbubbles was assessed quantitatively and qualitatively using methylene blue electrophoresis. Methylene blue staining was performed as previously described [44]. Following washing, 100 µL microbubbles were briefly treated in a sonicating water bath to disrupt the microbubble membrane, and heparin (200 U/mL) was added to dissociate antimiR from the lipid microbubble components prior to running the electrophoresis gel. A representative gel is shown in Online Figure S1 indicating that 40% of the antimiR added to the formulation could be loaded on to the microbubbles.

 Figure 1 

Microbubbles loaded with antimiR-23a for ultrasound-mediated therapeutic delivery. (A) Fluorescence microscopy image of myosin-stained cells indicating cardiomyocyte purity of >80%. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst (blue). (B) Sequence and structure of LNA-modified antimiR-23a. (C) Schematic rendering of antimiR-loaded cationic lipid-coated microbubbles. (D) Size distribution of microbubbles loaded with antimiR-23a, as measured by Coulter counter.

UTMC treatment with antimiR in vitro

Studies were performed to evaluate UTMC delivery of antimiR to cardiomyocytes in vitro as illustrated in Figure 2A. Cardiomyocytes were plated on collagen-coated (10 µg/cm²) 35 mm petri dishes for 48 h. AntimiR-loaded microbubbles (5 million or 10 million microbubbles with 3.5 or 7.0 pmol of antimiR, respectively) were added to cardiomyocyte cultures in DMEM/Ham's F12 media (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) with 2% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA, USA). The plates were sealed with parafilm, inverted, and incubated for 10 minutes to allow microbubbles to float to the top where cells were located. The inverted dishes were placed in a 37°C water bath and insonified using a Philips S-3 probe on a clinical ultrasound imaging system (Sonos 7500, Philips Healthcare, Bothell, WA, USA) in ultraharmonic mode (1.3 MHz, MI on-screen = 1.6, 4 frames/burst, 4 bursts/second). The MI of 1.6 was used for in vitro experiments to compensate for attenuation of ultrasound waves through the plastic petri dish, which reduced the pressure experienced by the plated cells. The transducer was scanned across the plate twice using the motorized controller on the Therapy Imaging Probe System (TIPS, Philips Healthcare) to expose the entire sample to ultrasound energy. Immediately following UTMC, the media was replaced with fresh media and samples were returned to the cell incubator. After UTMC treatment, phenylephrine (100 µM) was added to cardiomyocyte samples for varying durations (6-48 h) to induce hypertrophy.

UTMC treatment in vivo

Studies were performed to evaluate UTMC delivery of antimiR to mouse hearts in vivo (Figure 2B). A venous cannula for microbubble infusion was surgically placed in the jugular vein of anesthetized mice. An osmotic minipump (model 2002, Alzet Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was loaded with phenylephrine (100 mg/kg/d) and placed subcutaneously on day 0. UTMC treatments were performed on days 0, 3, and 7, following minipump placement. This dosing schedule was based on our prior work with UTMC-mediated delivery of STAT3 decoy to tumors [39]. A subset of five control animals did not receive phenylephrine infusion or UTMC treatment.

The clinical transducer used for this study transmits an ultrasound beam appropriately scaled in size for human echocardiography, but entirely covers both lung fields of the mouse. We thus considered the potential for air within the lungs to cause strong reflection, leading to constructive interference of the transmitted wave, resulting in regions of high pressure within the lungs and the potential for lung tissue damage. The lungs were therefore shielded from ultrasound by using acoustic absorbing material (polyurethane rubber, 1 cm thickness) with a circular window (10 mm diameter) placed on the chest overlying the heart, as previously described [40]. Correct alignment of the window over the heart was confirmed using B-mode imaging with a 15L8 probe on a Siemens clinical ultrasound imaging system (14 MHz, Sequoia 512, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Following alignment, UTMC treatment was applied using a clinical ultrasound imaging system (S3 probe, Sonos 7500, Philips Healthcare) in ultraharmonic mode (1.3 MHz, MI on-screen = 1.0, 4 consecutive frames/burst, 1 burst/second). The repetition rate of 1 burst/second was chosen empirically based on the time required for microbubbles to replenish the myocardium after each burst, as indicated by simultaneous contrast-enhanced echo imaging. Ultrasound pulses were not gated to the cardiac cycle due to the fact that each ultrasound burst spans an entire cardiac cycle in mice, who have heart rates greater than 500 bpm; gating the ultrasound pulses to the cardiac cycle would be possible in humans, whose heart rates are significantly less than that of mice.

AntimiR-loaded microbubbles (100 µL of microbubbles with 35 pmol of antimiRs) were continuously infused through the jugular cannula for 15 minutes at a rate of 0.4 mL/h during ultrasound treatment (Figure 2C). Ultrasound was applied for an additional 5 minutes post-infusion to insonify residual microbubbles in circulation (total ultrasound duration of 20 minutes).

 Figure 2 

Experimental setup for in vitro and in vivo ultrasound studies. (A) Schematic of experimental setup for in vitro studies of UTMC antimiR delivery to cardiomyocytes. (B) Schematic of experimental setup for in vivo studies of UTMC antimiR delivery to mouse hearts. AntimiR-loaded microbubbles were injected through the jugular vein and insonified in the heart with pulses from a clinical ultrasound imaging system. (C) Representative B-mode ultrasound image of nucleic acid-loaded microbubbles in mouse heart (acquired with Siemens Acuson ultrasound system).

To assess cardiac mass and function, echocardiography was performed at baseline, 1 week, and 2 weeks after phenylephrine pump implantation using a 30 MHz probe on a Vevo 2100 high-frequency ultrasound imaging system (VisualSonics, Toronto, CAN). Long-axis and short-axis B-mode and M-mode images were acquired on lightly anesthetized mice (heart rate > 400 bpm). Cardiac measurements were performed on short-axis M-mode images by an observer blinded to experimental condition using Vevo LAB software (VisualSonics) to determine LV mass, LV anterior and posterior wall thicknesses, LV internal diameter, and fractional shortening [45]. Mice were euthanized after the 2 week echocardiograms were obtained. LV mass was calculated by the Vevo LAB software using the following equation:

LV mass = 0.8424 × [(IVSd + LVIDd + PWd)³ - LVIDd³],

where IVSd is the diastolic intraventricular septal thickness, LVIDd is the diastolic left ventricular internal diameter, and PWd is the diastolic posterior wall thickness.

Analysis of cell area and molecular expression levels

For in vitro studies, the cross-sectional area of cardiomyocytes was measured by a blinded observer using brightfield microscopy images acquired at 10× magnification. Cells were harvested in TRIzol (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for analysis of miRNA expression. Total RNA was isolated using the miRNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Levels of mature miR-23a were assessed using the miScript assay (Qiagen) and normalized by U6 levels.

For in vivo studies, harvested mouse hearts were placed in ice-cold cardioplegia solution and sectioned. Heart weights were measured and transverse sections were fixed in 4% formalin and paraffin embedded for staining with FITC-wheat germ agglutinin. Cardiomyocyte cross-sectional areas were measured manually by a blinded observer using fluorescence microscopy images acquired at 20× magnification. For analysis of miRNA levels, tissue sections were homogenized in TRIzol and miRNA levels were quantified following the same procedure described for in vitro studies. Levels of hypertrophic mRNAs (ANP and MHY7) were assessed using RT-PCR.

Statistical Analysis

Comparisons between two experimental groups were determined using a Student's t-test, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05 (two-tailed). Comparisons among more than two experimental groups were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), with significance defined as p < 0.05. Post-hoc comparisons were performed using Tukey's test. Bars represent mean ± SEM.

Results

Suppression of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in vitro with UTMC and antimiR-23a

Studies were performed in vitro to evaluate the effect of ultrasound treatment with antimiR-loaded microbubbles on neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. To first assess whether UTMC, by itself, affected cell viability, trypan blue and MTT assays were performed following UTMC treatment with negative control (NC) antimiR-loaded microbubbles at a dose of either 5 million or 10 million microbubbles per sample (Online Figure S2). Cell viability was 88-98% as measured with trypan blue assay 30 minutes after UTMC or MTT assay 24 h after UTMC (normalized to no treatment control). Viability was retained at both microbubble doses and there were no statistically significant differences between each dose.

The effect of a single UTMC treatment on miR-23a levels in phenylephrine-treated cardiomyocytes was assessed in vitro using RT-PCR. As shown in Figure 3A, miR-23a levels after 24h phenylephrine stimulation were significantly lower following a single UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubble treatment at two different doses compared to the corresponding negative control conditions (UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubbles). Furthermore, it was found that miR-23a levels continued to be less, even after 48 h of phenylephrine exposure, in samples treated with UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubbles (3.5 pmol antimiR) compared to the negative control condition (UTMC + 3.5 pmol antimiR-NC microbubbles) (Figure 3B). In comparison, miR-23a levels in cardiomyocytes strongly tended to increase, up to several-fold (p = 0.13), within 6 h of phenylephrine exposure and remained elevated for up to 72 h (Online Figure S3A). In addition, treatment with antimiR-23a alone (without UTMC) had no significant effect on miR-23a levels in phenylephrine-treated cardiomyocytes (Online Figure S3B), demonstrating that ultrasound and microbubbles were necessary to effectively deliver antimiR-23a to cardiomyocytes and knock down miR-23a levels at the doses tested in this in vitro study.

Histologic studies demonstrated that UTMC targeted delivery of antimiR-23a suppressed phenylephrine-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in vitro. As shown in Figure 4, after 24 h of phenylephrine exposure, increase in cell area was significantly less after UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubble treatment compared to UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubble treatment (at two different antimiR doses). These results indicate that the reduced cardiomyocyte levels of miR-23a resulting from UTMC delivery of antimiR-23a in vitro caused the biologically predicted consequences of miR-23a antagonism.

Suppression of phenylephrine-induced cardiac hypertrophy in vivo with UTMC and antimiR-23a

Studies were performed in vivo to assess the effect of ultrasound treatment with antimiR-loaded microbubbles on phenylephrine-induced cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac function in mice. As shown in Figure 5A, the two UTMC-treated groups of mice developed progressive left ventricular hypertrophy over the course of two weeks of phenylephrine infusion, which was blunted in mice treated with UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubbles, with LV mass after 1 week of phenylephrine treatment being significantly less in this group compared to that in the UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubble group (p = 0.02). At 2 weeks (1 week after the final UTMC treatment) LV mass remained numerically lower in the mice treated with UTMC + antimR-23a microbubbles compared to mice treated with UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubbles, but the difference was no longer statistically significant. Figure 5B shows that fractional shortening at baseline was similar among the mice treated with no phenylephrine/no UTMC, and phenylephrine-treated mice receiving UTMC + antimiR23a or + antimiR-NC microbubbles. By 2 weeks, fractional shortening in the UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubble group was unchanged from baseline, whereas fractional shortening in the UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubble group had decreased from baseline by 23% (p < 0.02), such that it was significantly less than that in the UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubble group (p < 0.01). Also, compared to the no phenylephrine/no UTMC control group at 2 weeks, fractional shortening was no different in the UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubble group, but 25% less in the UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubble group at 2 weeks (p < 0.01), LV anterior and posterior wall thickness tended to be lower at 1 week in phenylephrine-treated mice receiving UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubbles compared to UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubbles, although the differences did not achieve statistical significance (Online Figure S4A and S4B, respectively). As shown in Online Figure S4C, at 2 weeks after phenylephrine minipump placement, LV end systolic diameter of UTMC + antimir-23a microbubble-treated mice was unchanged from baseline and no different from that in mice receiving no phenylephrine/no UTMC. In contrast -- and in line with the fractional shortening data (Figure 5B) -- by 2 weeks, LV end systolic diameter had increased in the mice receiving UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubbles (p = 0.03 vs. baseline) such that it was higher than that in mice treated with UTMC + antimir-23 (p = 0.06; Online Figure S4C). Figure 5C shows representative left ventricular end diastolic and end systolic frames from two mice at 2 weeks of phenylephrine infusion after UTMC treatment with antimiR-23a microbubbles (lower panels) or antimiR-NC microbubbles (upper panels), demonstrating preservation of systolic function in the antimiR-23a-treated mouse compared to the antimiR-NC control.

Mouse hearts were harvested at the end of the 2-week protocol and processed to analyze miR-23a levels, mRNA levels of hypertrophy markers, and to determine cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area in wheat germ agglutinin-stained sections. As shown in Figure 6A, there was a 4.5-fold increase in miR-23a levels in phenylephrine-treated mice receiving UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubble (p<0.001 vs. untreated no-phenylephrine group); miR-23a levels also increased in UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubble treated mice, but to a lesser extent (2.6-fold compared to the untreated no-phenylephrine group), and were significantly less than that in the UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubble treated mice (p < 0.01 vs. UTMC + antimiR-NC group). Furthermore, cardiomyocyte size following UTMC delivery of antimiR-23a tended to be less than that following UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubble treatment (p = 0.09, Figure 6B). Cardiac levels of hypertrophy markers ANP and MYH7 mRNA were less at 2 weeks in phenylephrine-treated mice receiving UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubble treatments compared to treatment with UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubbles (Online Figure S5) although the differences did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference between groups in post-mortem gross heart weight (Online Figure S6).

 Figure 3 

Ultrasound delivery of antimiR-23a reduces miR-23a in cardiomyocytes in vitro. UTMC-targeted delivery of antimiR-23a reduced miR-23a levels relative to each negative control condition at various (A) doses (after 24 h phenylephrine stimulation) and (B) duration of phenylephrine exposure (n=5-6/group at 3.5 pmol, n=3-6/group at 7.0 pmol, n=6/group at 6 h, n=9/group at 24 h, n=3/group at 48 h); *p<0.05.

 Figure 4 

Ultrasound delivery of antimiR-23a reduces cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in vitro. (A) UTMC-targeted delivery of antimiR-23a at two different antimiR doses suppressed cardiomyocyte hypertrophy after 24 h of phenylephrine exposure compared to antimiR-NC delivery at the same doses (n=3-4/group); *p<0.05. (B) Representative microscopy images of cardiomyocytes before and after phenylephrine stimulation and UTMC treatment with 3.5 pmol of antimiR-23a or antimiR-NC (scale bar = 10 µm).

 Figure 5 

Ultrasound delivery of antimiR-23a reduces cardiac hypertrophy and improves cardiac function in vivo. Echocardiographic analysis indicating suppression of phenylephrine-induced left ventricular hypertrophy and preservation of systolic function with UTMC targeted delivery of antimiR-23a compared to UTMC delivery of antimiR-NC. The “no phenylephrine/no UTMC” group received neither phenylephrine nor ultrasound. Compared to UTMC + antimiR-NC microbubbles, UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubble treatment (A) blunted development of LV hypertrophy at 1 week (*p=0.02), and (B) preserved fractional shortening at 2 weeks (*p<0.01, ¥ p<0.02 vs baseline, n=5-9 animals/group). (C) Representative end diastolic (left) and end systolic (right) B-mode frames at 2 weeks in two mice, showing preservation of left ventricular systolic function with UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubbles (lower panels) compared to control (upper panels). Scales (right side of each image) are the same for all frames. In these images the measured LV wall thickness at end-diastole was 0.80 mm and 1.00 mm with UTMC + antimiR-23a MB treatment and control treatment, respectively. The internal diameter at end-diastole was 4.29 mm and 4.61 mm with UTMC + antimiR-23a MB treatment and control treatment, respectively. The internal diameter at end-systole was 2.51 mm and 3.61 mm with UTMC + antimiR-23a MB treatment and control treatment, respectively. MB = microbubbles.

 Figure 6 

Ultrasound delivery of antimiR-23a reduces miR-23a levels and suppresses cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in vivo. (A) UTMC delivery of antimiR-23a suppressed phenylephrine-induced elevation of miR-23a levels in mouse hearts compared to UTMC delivery of antimiR-NC (*p<0.01, n=5-9/group). (B) Cardiomyocyte size strongly tended to be less following UTMC delivery of antimiR-23a compared to UTMC delivery of antimiR-NC, (p=0.09, n=5-9/group). (C) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of wheat germ agglutinin-stained left ventricular sections, demonstrating that UTMC treatment with antimiR-23a microbubbles suppressed phenylephrine-induced cell growth. Scale bar represents 40 µm.

Discussion

This study indicates that ultrasound targeted microbubble cavitation is an effective non-invasive approach for targeted delivery of antimiRs to the heart. In vitro, UTMC delivery of antimiR-23a to phenylephrine-treated cardiomyocytes blunted the rise in miR-23a levels and progressive cardiomyocyte hypertrophy that were seen in negative controls. Furthermore, in phenylephrine-treated mice, cardiac-directed UTMC delivery of antimiR-23a attenuated the rise in miR-23a levels, mitigated cardiac hypertrophy, and preserved cardiac function compared to ultrasound-targeted delivery of a negative control antimiR. We previously demonstrated functional cardiac delivery of siRNA against luciferase reporter using UTMC [40]. Other investigators have previously explored UTMC delivery of antimiR to the heart in acute studies [42, 43]. However, to our knowledge this is the first study to demonstrate suppression of a pathological cardiac condition (i.e. cardiac hypertrophy) following cardiac-targeted UTMC delivery of antimiRs.

Previous studies have demonstrated the anti-hypertrophic effect of antimiR-23a in mice receiving adrenergic agonists or transaortic constriction [26, 27]. However, in the prior studies, antimiRs were administered systemically and therefore could potentially induce unwanted side effects in off-target tissues. For example, reduced levels of miR-23a is associated with atrophy of skeletal muscle [46-48]. In addition, high doses (25-30 mg/kg/d for 7-14 days) were used in order achieve therapeutic effects in the heart. In our study, a dose of only 0.1 mg/kg was administered on 3 treatment days over 1 week. This suggests that UTMC can significantly reduce the antimiR dose needed for therapeutic efficacy (by a factor of over 200-fold). Only one dose was tested in this study but future experiments will compare the efficacy of other doses in order to determine whether this treatment approach is effective at doses even lower than the 0.1 mg/kg used in this study.

UTMC treatments with antimiR were initiated at the beginning of phenylephrine infusion, similar to other studies of miRNA therapy [26, 27]. Therefore, these preclinical studies have not addressed questions of whether treatment can cause regression of established cardiac hypertrophy. The results of the present study demonstrate proof-of-principle that UTMC is an effective strategy for functional delivery of antimiRs to the heart, providing groundwork for future studies aimed at determining whether this treatment strategy can attenuate or regress hypertrophy once it has already developed.

A limitation of our study is that the duration of antimiR activity resulting from UTMC was not fully defined. UTMC treatments were performed at days 0, 3, and 7 following initiation of phenylephrine infusion, and the study was terminated at day 14, one full week after the final UTMC treatment, with phenylephrine infusion ongoing throughout. The echocardiography results suggest that the functional effect of antimiR-23a delivery decreases over time: whereas UTMC-mediated delivery of antimiR-23a loaded microbubbles blunted phenylephrine-induced LVH at 1 week relative to controls, this difference was not sustained, and by 2 weeks into the protocol (1 week following the last UTMC treatment), LV mass was comparable between the UTMC + antimiR-NC-treated mice and UTMC + antimiR-23a-treated mice, in the presence of ongoing phenylephrine stimulation (Figure 5A). This finding was corroborated by the actual weights of the heart post-mortem (Online Figure S6).

Although myocardial miR-23a levels at 2 weeks in UTMC + antimiR-23a-treated mice were about half that in UTMC + antimiR-NC-treated mice, they were still twice that in non-phenylephrine treated (no UTMC) control mice (Figure 6), a relative difference which is similar to what we found in vitro. These levels of incomplete and relatively short term miR-23a inhibition were apparently insufficient to continue LVH suppression in the presence of ongoing phenylephrine infusion. Concordantly, this attenuation of therapeutic advantage as time elapsed after the last UTMC treatment was paralleled by the finding that levels of hypertrophy markers were not significantly reduced at 2 weeks in mice receiving UTMC + antimiR-23a microbubbles. Therefore, more treatments - past the 7 day timepoint used in our study - may have been be needed to maintain suppression of cardiac hypertrophy during ongoing phenylephrine exposure in this mouse model. Clinically, repeated treatments may also be needed to prevent progression of pathological LVH toward heart failure, but further preclinical studies would be needed to assess the effect of more frequent dosing schedules. In particular, our model was one of persistent hypertrophic stimulation with phenylephrine, ostensibly warranting ongoing antimiR-23a delivery to blunt the evolution of LVH. We would not anticipate the need for indefinite antimiR therapy in the clinical situation, where drivers of LVH (e.g. hypertension) would presumably also be treated. We do not expect that antimiR therapy would replace standard treatment strategies for management of LVH (i.e. oral drugs, exercise, weight loss) [49]. Instead, we envision that this approach could be used to augment standard treatments and induce stronger suppression of LVH, particularly for patients who respond poorly to standard treatments. A meta-analysis found that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers reduced LV mass in patients by 10% and 13%, respectively [16, 17], which is not as strong as the level of suppression observed in this preclinical study after 1 week of UTMC treatment (18%). We expect that the combination of standard therapies with antimiR treatments could potentially further suppress cardiac hypertrophy and may improve patient outcomes.

Interestingly, despite the loss of protection against LVH by 1 week after the last treatment (2 weeks into the protocol), UTMC mediated antimiR-23a treatment appeared to protect against phenylephrine-induced LV systolic dysfunction. This may reflect a benefit from the treatment-induced delay in the onset of LVH. Whether the preservation in systolic function in the antimiR-23a treated group would have been sustained beyond 2 weeks is unknown. Our data suggest, however, that the mitigation of phenylephrine-induced LVH by UTMC mediated antimiR-23a delivery is associated with subsequent preservation of systolic function.

This study investigated UTMC delivery of a single antimiR sequence (antimiR-23a). However, this approach could be extended to load microbubbles with multiple antimiRs simultaneously for targeted delivery to the heart. In addition to antimiRs, miRNA mimics could also be loaded onto cationic microbubbles, potentially enabling simultaneous modulation of multiple miRNAs with this approach. Strategies to target UTMC delivery of antimiRs/miRNA mimics only to specific cell types (i.e. cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, or endothelial cells) would also be important, as some miRNAs confer beneficial effects in certain cell types while having detrimental effects in others. In our study, it is unknown whether antimiR-23a delivery induced any effects in cardiac cells other than cardiomyocytes. We have initially focused on the established role of miR-23a in cardiomyocyte hypertrophy but future studies are needed to elucidate the effects of antimiR-23a therapy on other cardiac cell types such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, monocytes, and macrophages.

This approach could be effective in restoring levels of multiple miRNAs to normal levels, which could improve therapeutic responses where multiple signaling pathways, as is usually the case, are involved in the pathologic response. However, the functions of many miRNAs have not yet been well characterized and even less is known about the effects of manipulating multiple miRNAs simultaneously. In addition, these aspects will need to be explored further in future preclinical studies, including with large animal models such as swine, before clinical translation in humans can occur.

UTMC has potential adverse bioeffects that can occur under certain conditions. Prior studies have shown that UTMC can cause petechiae or hemorrhage, particularly in the lungs, when very high microbubble doses or high acoustic pressures are administered [50]. In our study, however, we used a clinical ultrasound imaging system which limits the acoustic pressures to levels that are considered safe for humans by regulatory agencies such as the FDA. Furthermore, in this study we used a microbubble dose which we previously tested in mice, with no damage or hemorrhage detected in cardiac tissues [40]. To maximize the antimiR dose that could be delivered, we maximally loaded the microbubbles and used a total microbubble dose that was higher than that currently FDA-approved for human use (10 µL/kg for Definity, [51]). We did not however, observe adverse effects in the mice. Future studies will explore lower microbubble doses to find the therapeutic window and to determine the minimal dose for effective antimiR therapy.

In summary, we have demonstrated that ultrasound targeted microbubble cavitation is an effective, non-invasive technique for targeted functional delivery of antimiRs to the heart. This study indicated for the first time that UTMC delivery of antimiRs can suppress pathological cardiac hypertrophy and preserve left ventricular systolic function with a dose more than 200-fold lower than that used in previous studies utilizing systemic delivery. This approach could potentially lead to significant improvements in treatment outcomes for patients suffering from pathological cardiac hypertrophy and other cardiovascular conditions.

Abbreviations

UTMC: Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Cavitation; LV: left ventricle; MB: microbubble.

Acknowledgements

The Philips TIPS system was purchased through the Clinical and Translational Science Institute at the University of Pittsburgh with support from the National Institutes of Health. Investigators on this study were supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health to the University of Pittsburgh (F32HL126421, R01EB016516, R01EB026966, and S10RR027383) and the American Heart Association (17SDG33660284).

Supplementary Material

Supplementary figures and tables.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. Drazner MH, Rame JE, Marino EK, Gottdiener JS, Kitzman DW, Gardin JM. et al. Increased left ventricular mass is a risk factor for the development of a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction within five years: the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2207-15

2. Gradman AH, Alfayoumi F. From left ventricular hypertrophy to congestive heart failure: management of hypertensive heart disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2006;48:326-41

3. Haider AW, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Increased left ventricular mass and hypertrophy are associated with increased risk for sudden death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1454-9

4. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, Savage DD, Laragh JH. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:345-52

5. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Left ventricular mass and incidence of coronary heart disease in an elderly cohort. The Framingham Heart Study. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:101-7

6. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1561-6

7. Verdecchia P, Carini G, Circo A, Dovellini E, Giovannini E, Lombardo M. et al. Left ventricular mass and cardiovascular morbidity in essential hypertension: the MAVI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:1829-35

8. Verdecchia P, Porcellati C, Reboldi G, Gattobigio R, Borgioni C, Pearson TA. et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy as an independent predictor of acute cerebrovascular events in essential hypertension. Circulation. 2001;104:2039-44

9. Lorell BH, Carabello BA. Left ventricular hypertrophy: pathogenesis, detection, and prognosis. Circulation. 2000;102:470-9

10. Beache GM, Herzka DA, Boxerman JL, Post WS, Gupta SN, Faranesh AZ. et al. Attenuated myocardial vasodilator response in patients with hypertensive hypertrophy revealed by oxygenation-dependent magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2001;104:1214-7

11. Burke AP, Farb A, Liang YH, Smialek J, Virmani R. Effect of hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy on coronary artery morphology in sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1996;94:3138-45

12. Carluccio E, Tommasi S, Bentivoglio M, Buccolieri M, Filippucci L, Prosciutti L. et al. Prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry in patients with a first, uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2000;74:177-83

13. Norton GR, Woodiwiss AJ, Gaasch WH, Mela T, Chung ES, Aurigemma GP. et al. Heart failure in pressure overload hypertrophy. The relative roles of ventricular remodeling and myocardial dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:664-71

14. Mathew J, Sleight P, Lonn E, Johnstone D, Pogue J, Yi Q. et al. Reduction of cardiovascular risk by regression of electrocardiographic markers of left ventricular hypertrophy by the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril. Circulation. 2001;104:1615-21

15. Wachtell K, Palmieri V, Olsen MH, Gerdts E, Papademetriou V, Nieminen MS. et al. Change in systolic left ventricular performance after 3 years of antihypertensive treatment: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint (LIFE) Study. Circulation. 2002;106:227-32

16. Klingbeil AU, Schneider M, Martus P, Messerli FH, Schmieder RE. A meta-analysis of the effects of treatment on left ventricular mass in essential hypertension. Am J Med. 2003;115:41-6

17. Lip GY. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and improved prognosis: some hope now... or hype?. Circulation. 2001;104:1582-4

18. Schoolwerth AC, Sica DA, Ballermann BJ, Wilcox CS, Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular D, the Council for High Blood Pressure Research of the American Heart A. Renal considerations in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease and the Council for High Blood Pressure Research of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2001;104:1985-91

19. Tomlinson LA, Abel GA, Chaudhry AN, Tomson CR, Wilkinson IB, Roland MO. et al. ACE inhibitor and angiotensin receptor-II antagonist prescribing and hospital admissions with acute kidney injury: a longitudinal ecological study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78465

20. Small EM, Olson EN. Pervasive roles of microRNAs in cardiovascular biology. Nature. 2011;469:336-42

21. van Rooij E, Marshall WS, Olson EN. Toward microRNA-based therapeutics for heart disease: the sense in antisense. Circ Res. 2008;103:919-28

22. Da Costa Martins PA, De Windt LJ. MicroRNAs in control of cardiac hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;93:563-72

23. Ikeda S, Kong SW, Lu J, Bisping E, Zhang H, Allen PD. et al. Altered microRNA expression in human heart disease. Physiol Genomics. 2007;31:367-73

24. van Rooij E, Sutherland LB, Liu N, Williams AH, McAnally J, Gerard RD. et al. A signature pattern of stress-responsive microRNAs that can evoke cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:18255-60

25. Busk PK, Cirera S. MicroRNA profiling in early hypertrophic growth of the left ventricle in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;396:989-93

26. Lin Z, Murtaza I, Wang K, Jiao J, Gao J, Li PF. miR-23a functions downstream of NFATc3 to regulate cardiac hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:12103-8

27. Wang K, Lin ZQ, Long B, Li JH, Zhou J, Li PF. Cardiac hypertrophy is positively regulated by MicroRNA miR-23a. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:589-99

28. Janssen HL, Reesink HW, Lawitz EJ, Zeuzem S, Rodriguez-Torres M, Patel K. et al. Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1685-94

29. Kwekkeboom RF, Lei Z, Doevendans PA, Musters RJ, Sluijter JP. Targeted delivery of miRNA therapeutics for cardiovascular diseases: opportunities and challenges. Clin Sci (Lond). 2014;127:351-65

30. Peng B, Chen Y, Leong KW. MicroRNA delivery for regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;88:108-22

31. Fan Z, Kumon RE, Deng CX. Mechanisms of microbubble-facilitated sonoporation for drug and gene delivery. Ther Deliv. 2014;5:467-86

32. Klibanov AL. Microbubble contrast agents: targeted ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-assisted drug-delivery applications. Invest Radiol. 2006;41:354-62

33. Klibanov AL, Shevchenko TI, Raju BI, Seip R, Chin CT. Ultrasound-triggered release of materials entrapped in microbubble-liposome constructs: a tool for targeted drug delivery. J Control Release. 2010;148:13-7

34. El Kaffas A, Gangeh MJ, Farhat G, Tran WT, Hashim A, Giles A. et al. Tumour Vascular Shutdown and Cell Death Following Ultrasound-Microbubble Enhanced Radiation Therapy. Theranostics. 2018;8:314-27

35. McMahon D, Hynynen K. Acute Inflammatory Response Following Increased Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Induced by Focused Ultrasound is Dependent on Microbubble Dose. Theranostics. 2017;7:3989-4000

36. Sirsi SR, Borden MA. Advances in ultrasound mediated gene therapy using microbubble contrast agents. Theranostics. 2012;2:1208-22

37. Bekeredjian R, Chen S, Frenkel PA, Grayburn PA, Shohet RV. Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction can repeatedly direct highly specific plasmid expression to the heart. Circulation. 2003;108:1022-6

38. Chen S, Shimoda M, Chen J, Grayburn PA. Stimulation of adult resident cardiac progenitor cells by durable myocardial expression of thymosin beta 4 with ultrasound-targeted microbubble delivery. Gene Ther. 2013;20:225-33

39. Kopechek JA, Carson AR, McTiernan CF, Chen X, Hasjim B, Lavery L. et al. Ultrasound Targeted Microbubble Destruction-Mediated Delivery of a Transcription Factor Decoy Inhibits STAT3 Signaling and Tumor Growth. Theranostics. 2015;5:1378-87

40. Kopechek JA, Carson AR, McTiernan CF, Chen X, Klein EC, Villanueva FS. Cardiac Gene Expression Knockdown Using Small Inhibitory RNA-Loaded Microbubbles and Ultrasound. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159751

41. Gill SL, O'Neill H, McCoy RJ, Logeswaran S, O'Brien F, Stanton A. et al. Enhanced delivery of microRNA mimics to cardiomyocytes using ultrasound responsive microbubbles reverses hypertrophy in an in-vitro model. Technol Health Care. 2014;22:37-51

42. Kwekkeboom RF, Lei Z, Bogaards SJ, Aiazian E, Kamp O, Paulus WJ. et al. Ultrasound and microbubble-induced local delivery of MicroRNA-based therapeutics. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41:163-76

43. Kwekkeboom RF, Sluijter JP, van Middelaar BJ, Metz CH, Brans MA, Kamp O. et al. Increased local delivery of antagomir therapeutics to the rodent myocardium using ultrasound and microbubbles. J Control Release. 2016;222:18-31

44. Lennox KA, Owczarzy R, Thomas DM, Walder JA, Behlke MA. Improved Performance of Anti-miRNA Oligonucleotides Using a Novel Non-Nucleotide Modifier. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2013;2:e117

45. Gao S, Ho D, Vatner DE, Vatner SF. Echocardiography in Mice. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. 2011;1:71-83

46. Hudson MB, Woodworth-Hobbs ME, Zheng B, Rahnert JA, Blount MA, Gooch JL. et al. miR-23a is decreased during muscle atrophy by a mechanism that includes calcineurin signaling and exosome-mediated export. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2014;306:C551-8

47. Murata M, Nonaka H, Komatsu S, Goto M, Morozumi M, Yamada S. et al. Delphinidin Prevents Muscle Atrophy and Upregulates miR-23a Expression. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65:45-50

48. Wada S, Kato Y, Okutsu M, Miyaki S, Suzuki K, Yan Z. et al. Translational suppression of atrophic regulators by microRNA-23a integrates resistance to skeletal muscle atrophy. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:38456-65

49. Hinderliter A, Sherwood A, Gullette EC, Babyak M, Waugh R, Georgiades A. et al. Reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy after exercise and weight loss in overweight patients with mild hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162:1333-9

50. Miller DL, Averkiou MA, Brayman AA, Everbach EC, Holland CK, Wible JH Jr. et al. Bioeffects considerations for diagnostic ultrasound contrast agents. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27:611-32 quiz 33-6

51. Muskula PR, Main ML. Safety With Echocardiographic Contrast Agents. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017:10

Author contact

Corresponding author: Flordeliza S. Villanueva, M.D. Center for Ultrasound Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics. University of Pittsburgh. Presbyterian University Hospital. South Tower E354.4, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Phone: (412) 647-5840. Fax: (412) 624-2264. E-mail: villanuevafsedu

Received 2019-3-14
Accepted 2019-7-23
Published 2019-9-21

Citation styles

©2024 Ivyspring International Publisher. Terms of use