PDF

Theranostics 2019; 9(11):3150-3169. doi:10.7150/thno.31828 This issue Cite

Review

Recent Developments of Supramolecular Metal-based Structures for Applications in Cancer Therapy and Imaging

Alexander Pöthig¹, Angela Casini^2,3

1. Department of Chemistry & Catalysis Research Center, Technical University of Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85747 Garching, Germany.
2. School of Chemistry, Cardiff University, Main Building, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom.
3. Institute for Advanced Study, Technical University of Munich, Department of Chemistry, Lichtenbergstr. 2 a, 85747 Garching, Germany.

✉ Corresponding author: E-mail: casiniaac.uk

Abstract

The biomedical application of discrete supramolecular metal-based structures, including supramolecular coordination complexes (SCCs), is still an emergent field of study. However, pioneering studies over the last 10 years demonstrated the potential of these supramolecular compounds as novel anticancer drugs, endowed with different mechanisms of action compared to classical small-molecules, often related to their peculiar molecular recognition properties. In addition, the robustness and modular composition of supramolecular metal-based structures allows for an incorporation of different functionalities in the same system to enable imaging in cells via different modalities, but also active tumor targeting and stimuli-responsiveness. Although most of the studies reported so far exploit these systems for therapy, supramolecular metal-based structures may also constitute ideal scaffolds to develop multimodal theranostic agents. Of note, the host-guest chemistry of 3D self-assembled supramolecular structures - within the metallacages family - can also be exploited to design novel drug delivery systems for anticancer chemotherapeutics. In this review, we aim at summarizing the pivotal concepts in this fascinating research area, starting with the main design principles and illustrating representative examples while providing a critical discussion of the state-of-the-art. A section is also included on supramolecular organometallic complexes (SOCs) whereby the (organic) linker is forming the organometallic bond to the metal node, whose biological applications are still to be explored. Certainly, the myriad of possible supramolecular metal-based structures and their almost limitless modularity and tunability suggests that the biomedical applications of such complex chemical entities will continue along this already promising path.

Keywords: supramolecular metal-based complexes, metallacages, cancer, drug delivery, theranostics.

1. Introduction

Inspired by the integrative self-sorting observed in nature, a variety of artificial metal-based supramolecular architectures have been developed in the last decades. Hereby, additionally to the regulated and controlled assembly of multi-component (bio) molecules, the metal-containing systems can be designed to include further functionalities in a very diverse way. Most of these supramolecular scaffolds consist of metal ions (Lewis acids) and multidentate ligands (Lewis bases) comprising heteroatoms, i.e. such assemblies are based on “classical” also called “Werner-type” coordination chemistry. Both the coordination geometry of the metal ions or clusters (nodes), as well as the geometry of the multidentate organic ligands (linkers), determine the structure of the resulting materials. If the geometrical combination leads to a divergent arrangement, infinite coordination polymers or networks can be formed. A very prominent subgroup of these materials are the porous coordination networks - also called metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) - which have been designed for a multitude of different applications (Figure 1) [1, 2].

In contrast, if the geometrical combination allows for a convergent arrangement of nodes and linkers, discrete two- or three-dimensional structures - so called supramolecular coordination complexes (SCCs) - can be obtained (Figure 1) [3]. By fine tuning the employed components, i.e. judicious choice of metal centers and complementary multidentate ligands, their size and (outer and inner) shape can be carefully controlled [4-7], which enables the synthesis of compound libraries. The two commonly applied synthetic strategies to obtain SCCs are the so-called edge- and face-directed approaches [5]. The latter was developed by Fujita in the late 90s and is also referred to as the 'paneling method' [8]. Hereby, the SCC is built up using planar multidentate ligand molecules, which upon coordination to (convergently oriented) vacant sites at metal nodes, form the faces of supramolecular polyhedra or polygons. The edge-directed approaches, pioneered by Stang et al. [4, 9], mainly employ bidendate 'banana-shaped' pyridyl-based ligands to form the edges of SCCs, mostly in combination with Pd(II) and Pt(II) metal nodes [7]. Raymond et al. significantly progressed both approaches, extending the investigations towards the dynamic behavior [10] and chirality[11] of SCCs, and catalysis in SCCs [12, 13]. Nitschke et al introduced the concept of 'subcomponent self-assembly'[14] according to which the actual linker is formed in situ (e.g. by imine formation out of aldehydes and amines) and which also allows for covalent post-assembly modifications of the SCCs [15]. Recently, Fujita and coworkers reported the synthesis and characterization of 'Pd₄₈L₉₆', the largest discrete self-assembled edge-directed polyhedron obtained so far, demonstrating the scalability of the size of SCCs [16].

Although a variety of structures have been reported in the literature, SCCs have been exploited for diverse applications only in recent years. In fact, among the most attractive areas of applicability, catalysis [17], sensing and molecular recognition [18-20] are certainly the most explored. Interestingly, the three-dimensional SCCs as the metallacages and chiral helicates have received great attention in the biomedical context. In general, metallacages feature an internal cavity (as a class of metallocavitands[21]) accessible to guest encapsulation, and thus, exploitable for various functions and applications involving host-guest chemistry [12, 20, 22]. Instead, helicates have been studied for their molecular recognition properties of nucleic acid structures, with possible applications in therapy [23].

Moreover, a recent area of considerable interest is the design and development of photoactive cages and capsules in which either the metal ion complexation or the bridging ligand are endowed with luminescence properties [24]. Such cages provide both a high concentration of chromophores and defined cavities to govern the host-guest optoelectronic interactions, and can be exploited for the design of novel imaging agents, as well as for sensing and photoactivation in biological systems.

 Figure 1 

Different types of metal-based assemblies (examples): Coordination polymers and networks formed by divergent (left) and discreet supramolecular complexes formed by convergent combinations of metal nodes and organic linkers (right).

 Figure 2 

Classification of supramolecular organometallic assemblies into different groups: (A) Assemblies with organometallic nodes (i.e. carbon metal bond within metal node) [25-29]. (B) Assemblies with organometallic linker molecules (i.e. carbon metal bond within linker molecule) [30, 31]. (C) Supramolecular Organometallic Complexes (SOCs, i.e. assemblies with a carbon metal bond between node and linker) [4, 32, 33]. Green: location of organometallic bond.

In addition to the SCCs built up of metal nodes and organic linkers by classic coordination chemistry using heteroatom donors, organometallic fragments featuring metal-carbon bonds have been introduced. Hereby, a carbon donor can in principle be implemented both in the linker molecules as well as in the capping ligands of the metal nodes (Figure 2). Concerning “organometallic nodes”, often very stable η⁵-(cyclopentadienyl) or η⁶-coordinated (benzene) metal half-sandwich or metal carbonyl complexes are employed (Figure 2A). In this case, the ligand is influencing the coordination geometry of the metal node, e.g. only allowing for a cis-coordination of potential linker molecules and therefore, determining the directionality leading to an edge-directed SCC assembly. Since the organometallic metal-ligand fragment is contained in the node, the assembly itself is still based on classic coordination chemistry. Examples of these compounds have been reported by various groups.[25-29]

There are two options for the implementation of the organometallic character into the linker molecules. First, if the carbon donor is not interacting with the metal nodes of the assembly but the organometallic bond is an integral part of the ligand molecule itself - rendering it an “organometallic linker” (Figure 2B) - the organometallic bond-formation is primarily influencing the linker stability, geometry and properties. Therefore, the organometallic bond is only indirectly affecting the self-assembly, which is again determined by classic coordination chemistry. In this case, the final compound can be also classified as a SCC. Examples of these kind of ligands used in SCCs are metallocene-based linkers, featuring more than one heteroatom as donor, e.g. ditopic ferrocenyl-dicarboxylic acids [31], tetratopic pyridyl-substituted Fe-metallocenes [34], or ditopic linkers featuring N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) complexes [30].

Second, if the carbon donor is part of the linker-node connection, the (organic) linker is forming the organometallic bond to the metal node, thus, producing supramolecular organometallic complexes (SOCs) (Figure 2C). In contrast to the organometallic metal nodes, in this case, the carbon-metal bond is now structurally decisive for the “organometallic assembly” of the resulting SOC. Multidentate linkers used to build up such assemblies are mainly based on alkynyl, metal-arene [4], or NHC-donor groups. In particular, multidentate NHC ligands have undergone an enormous development in the past years, pioneered by the groups of Bielawski [35], Peris [36], and Hahn [37], also towards implementation in SOCs [32, 33]. The possibility of tailoring the electronic and steric properties of the NHCs by synthetic modification of the heterocycle (e.g. so called backbone- or wingtip-modification) [38-41] also allows for the introduction of water-solubility [42] and therefore, renders these donors an excellent class for SOC linker design.

Furthermore (late transition metal) NHC complexes in general are very stable and - with few exceptions (e.g. Ag(I) complexes) - the ligands can be regarded as “spectator ligands” [43], i.e. they stick to the metal ion and do not dissociate or get transferred. As a result, there is a significant difference with respect to the SCCs based on classic coordination chemistry. The latter can be regarded as dynamic assemblies which in principle can reversibly form and disrupt. In contrast, late transition metal NHC-based SOCs in general can be regarded as 'static' structures, which do not reversibly assemble and disassemble. The strong metal-NHC bond (e.g. Au(I)-NHC bond) [44] disfavors a dissociation, which would lead to free N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. Free NHCs are furthermore very basic and therefore, likely to be protonated to form the corresponding azolium salt (especially under physiological conditions), which means they would be irreversibly removed from the dissociation equilibrium. This was deliberately used in the case of the pillarplexes, a family of NHC-based organometallic cavitands (a subclass of SOCs) featuring a tubular pore introduced in 2016 [45]. Interestingly, the pore can be used to selectively incorporate linear molecules, the pillarplexes can be easily made water soluble by simple anion exchange and the Au(I) congeners exhibit an intrinsic luminescence, without the necessity of further functionalization. Upon lowering of the pH value, the metal ions (in this case Ag(I)) can be released and the corresponding imidazolium ions are obtained, which was implemented in a mechanically interlocked molecular switch with two discrete states [46]. It is worth mentioning that coinage metal NHC complexes themselves are potentially interesting in the biomedical context. Hereby, silver NHC compounds are known to possess anti-microbial activity [47] and gold NHC compounds have relevance as anti-cancer metallodrugs [48-50]. Therefore, NHC-based SOCs are promising candidates for investigation towards biomedical applications, which was also shown in a very recent study on the toxicity of the pillarplexes [51].

Overall, this review is not intended to present details on the synthetic strategies to achieve various SCCs or SOCs, rather to summarize some general design principles focusing on the most recent examples from those systems having applications in anticancer therapy. Recent thematic reviews from different groups have commented the exponential progresses made in the design, synthesis and numerous applications of these discrete nanostructures [5, 6, 17, 20, 21, 52], and we refer the reader to these papers for further information. Here, we will focus on discussing SCCs as cytotoxic agents or as drug delivery systems for chemotherapics, emphasizing the high versatility and tunability of these scaffolds. In addition, we will present the few relevant in vivo studies on anticancer SCCs, which validate the concept and pave the way to their clinical application. Thus, we aim at providing the future outlook for this exciting research area, which, in defining the various challenges, will hopefully stimulate new ideas within the supramolecular, bioinorganic and medicinal chemistry communities.

2. SCCs as anticancer agents

Taking inspiration from the clinical success of the Pt(II) anticancer drug cisplatin [53, 54], SCCs themselves are under investigation as experimental cytotoxic anticancer agents. In the next sections, some of the most investigated systems are presented, including coordination and organometallic supramolecular systems, providing an idea of their main features and design principles.

2.1. Cytotoxic palladium and platinum SCCs

In palladium(II) and platinum(II) SCCs, the metal precursor can be cis-capped to allow only two coordination sites available for complexation to multidentate ligands to form discrete SCC architectures featuring square planar geometry around the metal centre [52]. For example, 2D dinuclear Pt(II) and Pd(II) metallacycles coordinated to amide-based dipyridyl ligands and 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino) ferrocene ligands, have been studied as cytotoxic agents in vitro [55]. Interestingly, both metallacycles displayed increased antiproliferative effects compared to their metal precursors and organic ligands, suggesting that the structure of the intact metallacycle is essential for the observed activity [55]. Interestingly, the Pt(II)-based metallacycle was found to be a more potent inhibitor of cell proliferation against, head and neck, and thyroid cancer cell lines than cisplatin, and yet was less toxic against non-cancerous cells [55]. The mechanism of action of both metallacycles was investigated in vitro against the T98G brain tumor cell line [55], The results show that both compounds are easily internalized by the cancer cells, and induce oxidative stress eventually leading to cell death by apoptosis.

Concerning 3D supramolecular architectures, a highly charged [Pt₆L₄]¹²⁺ metallacage was studied for its antiproliferative activity [56], and it displayed similar cytotoxicity range as cisplatin towards a range of human cancer cell lines, while it was ca. 7-fold less toxic than cisplatin towards normal lung cells. Moreover, the cage was found to be localized inside the cell nucleus using atomic absorption spectroscopy [56]. It was also shown that the mechanism of action involves the compound's non-covalent binding to DNA via intercalation.

Studies by Crowley and coworkers on the effect of different ligands (functionalized trispyridyl scaffolds with rigid alkene linker vs benzotriazoles, hexane-triazoles and PEG-triazoles-bisfunctionalised phenyl rings) on the biological activity of Pd₂L₄ helicates have also been carried out, and showed a direct correlation between the stability of the helicate in biological media and its antiproliferative effects [57]. Similar [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ (L = 1,3-bis-hexanetriazole phenyl) helicates endowed with sufficient stability in aqueous environment were also found to be up to seven-fold more toxic (IC₅₀ ca. 6 μM) than cisplatin against the cisplatin-resistant MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line after 24 h incubation [57], and cell death appeared to be induced by disruption of the cell membrane [57].

Finally, examples of 3D metallacages, of the type Pd₂L_4, have also been reported as experimental anticancer agents either via tethering or encapsulation of a cytotoxic agent, exploiting the so-called prodrug concept. As a recent example, the conjugation of prodrugs to the surface of a 2D SCC has been described. Specifically, a supramolecular [Pt₃L₃]⁶⁺ hexagon was formed by self-assembly between a dinuclear Pt(IV) precursor and a bidentate ligand conjugated to organoplatinum species. The resulting supramolecular hexagons would deliver three equivalents of cisplatin upon reduction of the Pt(IV) prodrug in the intracellular environment (Figure 3) [58]. The antiproliferative effects of the supramolecular hexagon were tested against a range of cancer cell lines, sensitive or resistant to cisplatin, resulting in a more potent cytotoxic effect than cisplatin [58], even though no control with a Pt(IV) prodrug alone was reported. Mechanistic studies suggested that the prodrug induced apoptosis by causing DNA damage due to the intracellular release of cisplatin upon reduction of the Pt(IV) complex. Quantification of the intracellular Pt content suggested that the increased potency of the supramolecular hexagon was due to its higher cellular uptake compared to free cisplatin [58].

With the aim to exploit coordination-driven self-assembly to increase the anticancer potential of an adamantyl Pt(IV) prodrug, Lippard and coworkers used a tridentate ligand and a [Pt^II(ethane-1,2-diamine)] precursor to achieve a cationic [Pt₄L₆]¹²⁺ cage able to encapsulate the Pt(IV) complex [60]. Of note, the latter had low solubility in water (<500 μM) but became readily soluble when mixed with the cage. The hydrophobic adamantyl moiety of the prodrug molecule was postulated to be securely encapsulated within the hydrophobic cavity of the hexanuclear cage, as suggested by 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy. The cage encapsulating the Pt(IV) complex was moderately cytotoxic in A549 human lung cancer cells, but still more potent than the Pt(IV) prodrug and of the hexanuclear Pt(II) cage alone [60]. The mechanistic hypothesis is that the Pt(IV) complex is reduced intracellularly by ascorbic acid, thus, releasing cisplatin, 1-adamantylamine, and succinic acid, as suggested by NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry methods.

 Figure 3 

A) Schematic representation of a [Pt₃L₃]⁶⁺ hexagon exo-functionalised with three moieties of a Pt(IV) prodrug [58]. B) The amphiphilic polymer Pt-PAZMB-b-POEGMA, containing glutathione (GSH)-responsive deblock copolymers as the arms and an aggregation-induced emissive Pt(II) metallacycle as the core unit [59].

Further studies on a similar water soluble [Pt₄L₆]¹²⁺ metallacage, forming drug-loaded nanoparticles with an anionic polymer, revealed that the fluorophore fluorescein could also be encapsulated within the cavity [61]. Thus, the fluorescein moiety was conjugated to a Pt(IV) prodrug and encapsulated in the metallacage, and the cellular uptake and release of the guest prodrug could be studied in HeLa cells in vitro by fluorescence microscopy [61]. The necessity of optimizing the formulation of SCCs for drug delivery via formation of nanoparticles has also been elegantly addressed by Stang and coworkers using covalent conjugation of a polymer to formulate a Pt(II)-based supramolecular metallacycle into 50 nm nanoparticles, formed by self-assembly, for the delivery of doxorubicin (DOX) [59]. The resulting Pt-PAZMB-b-POEGMA amphiphilic polymer is shown in Figure 3B. The impacts of the morphology and size of the supramolecular assemblies on their endocytic pathways, uptake rates and efficiency, as well as cytotoxic effects were also investigated in vitro [59]. To evaluate the in vivo antitumor efficacy, HeLa tumor-bearing mice were intravenously injected with the DOX-nanoformualation (5.00 mg DOX/kg, 0.150 mg Pt/kg) and showed enhanced tumor reduction with respect to free DOX, while presenting low systemic toxicity [59].

2.2. Cytotoxic ruthenium(II)-arene SCCs

Biologically active Ru-based coordination and organometallic complexes [62] have recently prompted analogous studies of ruthenium(II)-arene supramolecular coordination complexes with a particular focus on their anticancer properties. Typically, ruthenium(II) ions (d⁶ electronic configuration) adopt a hexa-coordinated octahedral coordination geometry. Hence, in order to produce discrete supramolecular entities, rather than extended coordination polymers or MOFs, an auxiliary ligand is needed to block some of the several Ru(II) coordination sites. In most cases, this is achieved by using dinuclear piano-stool ruthenium(II)-arene “clip” complexes linked together via pyridine containing multidentate ligands, to form a range of 3D and 2D supramolecular polyhedra [63-69]. These metalla-assemblies possess different functional groups, situated either at the periphery or at the core of the assembly.

Supramolecular ruthenium(II) metallacycles were already reported in the late 1990's and displayed properties, such as water solubility and stability, which make them suitable for biological applications. It was initially postulated that cytotoxicity associated with supramolecular Ru(II) complexes was due to their intracellular dissociation, and subsequent binding of the released ruthenium cations to proteins and DNA, causing extensive cell damage and apoptosis [64]. Interestingly, these complexes have been shown to cause cell death also by triggering excessive autophagy, the controlled process of recycling dysfunctional or destroyed proteins and organelles via lysosome digestion [70]. Within a series of ruthenium(II)-arene metallarectangles with different paneling linkers, one derivative has been shown to be moderately cytotoxic in vitro against multidrug resistant human colon cancer cells (HCT-15/CLO2, IC₅₀ ca. 16.5 μM) compared to cisplatin and doxorubicin [63], suggesting that the mechanism of cytotoxic action of these supramolecular structures is different from those of classical anticancer metallodrugs and requires further investigation.

Similarly to metallacycles, ruthenium(II)-arene metallabowls have also been developed and tested for their antiproliferative properties in vitro against a range of cancer cell lines (colorectal, gastric, and liver cancer cells) [69-71]. Among them, a metallabowl featuring 8-dihydroxy-1,4-naphthaquinonato ligands was two-fold active than both cisplatin and doxorubicin against HCT-15 cells [69]. Further investigations showed that, upon metallabowl exposure, the expression of two known colorectal cancer suppressors, p53 and the Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene, increased in HCT-15 cells [69, 71].

By introducing tridentate, planar ligands to the binuclear arene Ru(II) “clips”, a range of hexanuclear 3D Ru(II) metallacages have been reported by variation of the paneling linker ([Ru₂(p-ⁱPrC₆H₄Me)₂(OO∩OO)][CF₃SO₃]₂ (OO∩OO = 2,5-dioxydo-1,4-benzoquinonato [dobq], 5,8-dihydroxy-1,4-naphthaquinonato (donq), and 6,11-dihydroxy-5,12-naphthacenedionato [dotq] etc.)) [72-75]. Among them, the dinuclear “clip” containing donq as the bridging ligand was a moderate inhibitor of cell viability against a range of cancer cell lines (25 < IC₅₀ < 90 μM), whereas all the other tested metallacages were non-cytotoxic [64, 76]. Alongside ruthenium-arene complexes exhibiting antiproliferative effects per se, the synthesis of three new pyrenyl-containing dendrimers and their encapsulation into a water-soluble hexaruthenium(II)-arene metallaprisms was achieved, and the resulting host-guest systems were shown to possess enhanced antiproliferative effects in cancer cells in vitro with respect to the free components [77].

2.3. DNA Targeted SCCs

Most of the numerous cytotoxic SCCs mentioned in previous sections were not designed to specifically target cancer cells, thus, leading to possible side effects. With the aim to develop tumor directed SCCs, the chirality of some of these scaffolds was exploited to direct molecular recognition of specific biological targets, namely nucleic acids. Within the helicates family, Hannon and coworkers developed the synthesis of 'cylinders', dinuclear triple-helical compounds which are prepared in a single step from a pyridyl-aldehyde, a diamine and an octahedral metal (usually Fe(II) or Ni(II) ) (Figure 4A) [78]. The cylinders differ from earlier helicates also since they are endowed with certain rigidity along the length of the structure, due to π-stacking interactions between the rings of the diphenylmethane 'spacer'. By contrast, the Lehn helicate systems comprise bipyridine ligands linked by flexible alkyl or alkylether chains, introducing a higher degree of flexibility into the helical structure [79, 80].

A first study investigated the mode of binding of a binuclear Fe(II) triple-stranded cylinder to a DNA model by NMR spectroscopy and computational modelling techniques [81]. The obtained results suggested that the cylinder binds to the DNA major groove. It was also revealed that although a racemic mixture of the chiral helicate was introduced to the double stranded oligonucleotide, only the M-enantiomer was able to bind DNA causing a change in its conformation [81]. The mode of binding of the Fe(II) cylinder was further studied and revealed that the helix preferentially binds to short (8-10 base pairs) purine-pyrimidine tracts within the DNA sequence [82]. The affinity for specific DNA sequences proved a promising feature to target cancer cells via binding of the helicates to oncogenes [82].

Later on, it was also discovered that Fe(II) cylinders have a high specificity for RNA 3-way junctions [62], as well as for certain non-canonical secondary DNA structures, such as DNA bulges [83, 84] and G-quadruplex DNA (G4) [85]. In particular, targeting telomeric G4s and stabilization of these structures has been shown to inhibit telomerase activity, leading to cell death [86]. To that end, a pair of enantiomeric Fe(II) helicates which were soluble in aqueous media were synthesized, and their affinity for human telomeric G4s was assessed [85]. The P-enantiomer Fe(II) helicate was found to bind strongly and selectively to the G4, whereas the M-enantiomer showed no association. Furthermore, the strong binding affinity to G-quadruplex DNA translated into strong inhibition of telomerase activity.

Triple stranded “Y-shaped” junctions are an example of another non-canonical DNA structure which form during DNA transcription and replication, and whose regulation may allow to achieve antiproliferative effects and, most importantly, cell cycle control. Several studies have shown that these structures can be targeted by binuclear metallahelicates (Fe(II) and Ru(II)-based) [23, 82, 84, 87-90]. In 2010, Hannon and coworkers showed that the stabilization of Y-shaped junctions by supramolecular Ru(II) cylinders severely inhibits the function of polymerase enzymes, accounting for their cytotoxicity [88]. This study provides crucial evidence that the non‐covalent DNA binding of the cylinders can indeed affect the ability of proteins to process the DNA information. Further studies of DNA binding of Fe(II) helicates revealed that, to facilitate strong binding to the major groove of duplex DNA, a rigid helicate is preferred over the analogous flexible helicates [91]. The former was also a potent cytotoxic agent against cisplatin resistant human ovarian carcinoma cells [91].

In addition to Fe-based helicates, the self-assembled platinum(II) molecular square [Pt(en)(4,4′-dipyridyl)]₄ (en = ethylenediamine) has been reported to be an efficient G-quadruplex binder and telomerase inhibitor (Figure 4B) [92]. Molecular modeling studies combined to molecular dynamics (MD) calculations suggested that the square arrangement of the four bipyridyl ligands, the highly electropositive nature of the overall complex, as well as hydrogen bonding interactions between the ethylenediamine ligands and phosphates of the DNA backbone all contribute to the observed strong binding affinity to the G4 (Figure 4B). More recently, a supramolecular [Pt₂L₂]⁶⁺ binuclear metallacycle with large, planar 2,7-diaza-pyrene-based ligands has been explored for its DNA binding properties [94]. This interaction caused DNA bending, which in turn prevented DNA processing and replication. Moreover, the metallacycle exhibited antiproliferative effects in cancer cells and different spectrum of activity with respect to cisplatin [94]. Supramolecular Pt(II) quadrangular boxes with L-shaped 4,4′-bipyridine ligands were also shown to bind duplex and G-quadruplex DNA motifs in a size-dependent fashion [95]. Specifically, three dinuclear Pt(II) molecular squares of distinct size (ranging between 110-220 Å) inhibited cancer cells' growth and heavily influenced the expression of genes known to form G-quadruplexes in their promoter regions. Interestingly, the smallest Pt-box displayed less activity, but enhanced selectivity for the G4 promoter c-Kit, as shown by FRET (Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) DNA melting assays [95].

 Figure 4 

A) Schematic representation and corresponding X-ray structures of a cylindrical [Ni₂L₃]⁴⁺ helicate (CCDC n° 722438) [78] and a [Fe₂L₃]⁴⁺ helicate (CCDC n° 622770); B) Schematic representation of a multinuclear Pt(II) metallacycle acting as quadruplex binder and telomerase inhibitor and its adduct with a G4 structure studied by molecular modeling [92] (Adapted with permission from 'J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130 (31), 10040-10041'. Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society.); C) Schematic representation of a Ru₈ cage bearing porphyrin ligands studied as nucleic acid binder [93].

Finally, 3D SCCs, including boxes and cubes, have been reported to be able to interact with nucleic acids. For example, porphyrin-based scaffolds were designed and linked via ruthenium complexes used as bridging blocks able to connect two porphyrin units and create octa-ruthenium supramolecular cubes (Figure 4C) [93]. The G4 binding properties of the cubes were studied by different techniques, including fluorescence intercalation displacement (FID) and surface plasmon resonance, and the obtained results showed strong interactions with different G4 models, but also scarce selectivity with respect to duplex DNA.

2.4. Metalla-assemblies as PDT agents

In traditional photodynamic therapy (PDT), a photosensitizer interacts with oxygen to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) upon light activation. ROS induce cell death via different pathways, including extensive damage of unsaturated lipids and certain amino acid side chains as well as of the nitrogenous bases of nucleic acids. PDT is considered a promising treatment as it possesses several benefits in comparison to common cancer therapies [96]. However, this technique is still limited due to a number of drawbacks, generally associated with a residual photosensitivity after PDT treatment, difficulty to treat metastases, the need of light at a specific wavelength to be able to reach deeper tumors, as well as an adequate tissue oxygenation. For example, several ruthenium-arene metalla-assemblies coupled to photosensitizers, including porphyrins, were prepared and tested as PDT agents [97]. Recently, Therrien and coworkers have synthesized an anthracene-based metalla-rectangle with the idea to improve the cell uptake of the photosensitizer (anthracene) [98]. In the presence of oxygen and light activation, anthracene forms an endoperoxide intermediate. The endoperoxide formation is reversible, and oxygen can be released in a different environment. Unfortunately, upon formation of the metalla-assembly, the propensity of the anthracene moiety to react with oxygen to form endoperoxide derivatives was lost [98].

Noteworthy, in this area, Borondipyrromethene (BODIPY) is a class of fluorescent dyes used for many applications such as light harvesting, imaging, in solar cells and for PDT [99-101]. Thus, BODIPY-based palladium, platinum, iron, and zinc supramolecular structures have been synthesized by self-assembly and analysed for their host-guest chemistry and biological properties.[102-104] Inspired by these properties of BODIPY-based supramolecules, Gupta, Lee and coworkers designed, synthesized, and studied for their antiproliferative activities new ruthenium and iridium metalla-rectangles featuring a BODIPY-based linker (Figure 5) [103, 105]. Confocal laser scanning microscopy studies suggested that the compounds use a cytoplasmic mechanism of action in causing cell death. Additionally, binding studies revealed the ability of compounds to interact with both DNA and protein [105]. However, the possibility of using such metalla-rectangles as PDT agents remains to be explored.

 Figure 5 

X-ray structures of rectangles (A) [2]⁴⁺ and (B) [4]⁴⁺ from ref. [105].

One of the first examples of a SCC featuring a BODIPY ligand for applications as theranostic agent was reported by Cook and coworkers [106], who investigated the coordination-driven self-assembly of two novel Pt(II) supramolecular triangles containing a pyridyl-functionalized BODIPY ligand. While the Pt(II) moieties can also act as cytotoxic agents, the BODIPY cores within triangles enable their transport within cancer cells to be visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Moreover, the BODIPY ligands also form the basis for use as a photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy (PDT). The obtained results showed that the combination of PDT and chemotherapy greatly enhances anticancer efficacy through a synergistic therapeutic effect, particularly against drug resistant cancer cells in vitro [20].

3. SCCs as drug delivery systems for anticancer agents

The focus of this chapter is on SCCs that show promise for biomedical applications not due to their intrinsic anticancer potential, but for their favorable properties as drug delivery systems. This is particularly relevant to cancer chemotherapy, whose success rate remains limited, primarily due to scarce selectivity of drugs for the tumor tissue, often resulting in severe toxicity and in the development of drug resistance. So far, lipid nano-systems, such as liposomes and micelles, along with virus-inspired vectors and polymeric particles, dendrimers as well as inorganic nanoparticles, have been studied to deliver bioactive compounds to tumor sites. However, such targeted constructs have several limitations: for example, polymers and dendrimers often require considerable synthetic effort and can be plagued by low yields and largely amorphous final structures, while nanoparticles often present issues of toxicity and lack of biodegradability [107].

In this context, supramolecular metallacages feature a number of properties that make them attractive candidates for future drug delivery systems. For example, the rigid, porous structure offers a secure cavity for small drug molecules, to protect them from metabolism, and the ability to modify the ligand structure both pre- and post- self-assembly allows for the properties of the resulting cage to be improved. Furthermore, since metallacages, at variance with MOFs, are discrete chemical entities, the issues of solubility in an aqueous environment can be potentially overcome. Despite these attractive features, SCC drug delivery is still in its infancy [108].

Overall, SCC as drug delivery systems can be based on i) both encapsulation of a drug, driven by hydrophobicity of the cargo drug molecule and the host cavity, and non-covalent interactions within the host cavity (e.g. H-bonding, van der Waals), as well as ii) covalent bonding of a prodrug species to the SCC architecture. In the latter case, the prodrug can then be cleaved and activated via external chemical stimuli to allow drug release in a controlled manner. In this chapter, representative examples of both strategies are provided.

Based on previous studies on ruthenium(II) metallacycles in 2008 [109], pioneering work by Therrien and coworkers on SCCs as drug delivery systems focused on the study of water soluble hexaruthenium metallacages (metalla-prisms) able to encapsulate lipophilic molecules.[29] Thus, the cationic hexanuclear metalla-prism [(p-cymene)₆Ru₆(tpt)₂(dhbq)₃]⁶⁺ (tpt = 2,4,6-trispyridyl-1,3,5-triazine; dhbq = 2,5-dihydroxy-1,4-benzoquinonato) was shown to encapsulate two hydrophobic Pd^II and Pt^II complexes [M(acac)₂] (M = metal, acac = acetylacetonato) (Figure 6) [29]. While the [M(acac)₂] complexes are completely inactive due to their inherent lack of solubility in water, the metalla-prism is water soluble and moderately cytotoxic (IC₅₀ ca. 23 μM) against human ovarian A2780 cancer cells. This initial study provided the proof-of-concept for the so-called “Trojan horse strategy” of protecting a cytotoxic agent in the cavity of a metallacage until, after cell uptake, the drug can be released and perform its cell-killing activity. In fact, the encapsulated [Pd(acac)₂] - ([Pd(acac)₂]⊂[(p-cymene)₆Ru₆(tpt)₂(dhbq)₃]⁶⁺]) - was 20-fold more cytotoxic (IC₅₀ ca. 1 μM) than the empty metalla-prism [29].

Following these promising results, a hexaruthenium metallacage of the type [Ru₆(p-iPrC₆H₄Me)₆(tpt)₂(C₆H₂O₄)₃]⁶⁺ was investigated for the release mechanism of encapsulated fluorescent pyrene derivatives and for its anticancer properties in vitro [28]. The obtained results showed that, while the free pyrene derivative and the cage complex alone were scarcely cytotoxic (IC₅₀ ca. 16 µM or higher), the host-guest complex was considerably more active (IC₅₀ ca. 6 µM) [28]. The increased cytotoxicity of the water soluble cage-pyrene complex was due to an increased uptake of the overall system as shown by fluorescence microscopy. Of note, the fluorescence of the pyrene derivatives is quenched upon encapsulation, allowing for the release of the molecule to be monitored by fluorescence spectroscopy [28]. In further studies, the encapsulation properties of the hexaruthenium metallacage with a series of functionalized fluorescent pyrene derivatives was characterized using NMR (¹H, 2D, DOSY) spectroscopy and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) [110]. The antiproliferative properties of the vacant cage and the pyrene-cage complexes were studied in A2780 ovarian cancer cells, and the host-guest complexes showed the lowest IC₅₀ values [110]. The study also demonstrated that the hexaruthenium cage complexes can improve the efficacy of insoluble inhibitors in vitro.

The effect of the portal size of the hexaruthenium metallacage complex on the retention of the planar guest molecules, [Pd(acac)₂] complex and 1-(4,6-dichloro-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)pyrene, was also investigated [113]. Thus, three hexaruthenium cages were prepared by extending the polycyclic aromatic system in the di-ruthenium bridging ligands, using the 1,4-naphthoquinonato, 1,4-anthraquinonato, and 5,12-naphthacenedionato analogues, which progressively decreased the portal size of the cage, while the internal cavity remained largely the same. The host-guest properties of these water-soluble supramolecular drug delivery systems were studied in solution by NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy. The results showed that the complex with the largest pore size (estimated to be approximately 7.4×10.2 Å by molecular modeling) is more stable, suggesting that a larger pore size facilitates the entrance of the guest molecule in the cage, while the smaller pore size retains the guest molecule more effectively [113]. Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) and fluorescence microscopy allowed to assess that all cages deliver the host to intracellular organelles and the mechanisms of uptake involve endocytosis/macropinocytosis rather than passive diffusion across the cell membrane [113].

Other examples of SCCs as drug delivery systems, based on other transition metals, include surface functionalized porous coordination nanocages of Cu(II) and 5-(prop-2-ynyloxy)isophthalic acid (pi), bearing a water solubilizing polymer (PEG5k), which were synthesized using a “click chemistry” approach [114]. The scaffold is composed of 12 di-copper paddlewheel clusters and 24 isophtalate moieties, with 8 triangular and 6 square windows that are roughly 8 and 12 Å across, respectively. The internal cavity has a diameter of ca. 15 Å and the cage has high stability in aqueous medium. In addition, the cages' drug loading and release capacity has been evaluated using the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) [114]. Drug release experiments were carried out by dialyzing the drug-loaded Cu(pi)-PEG5k against phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution at room temperature. Interestingly, around 20% of the loaded drug was released during the first 2 hours, while a flatter release curve can be observed up to 24 hours. The slow release has been associated to the slow diffusion rate of 5-FU caused by the strong interaction between Lewis acid sites in Cu(pi) and basic site of 5-FU.

Based on previous work by Fujita and coworkers [115], and within the M₂L₄ cage family, Crowley et al. designed a cationic [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ cage using (2,6-bis(pyridin-3-ylethynyl)pyridine) as the bidentate ligand, and characterized the 3D system by various methods, including ¹H NMR spectroscopy, ESI-MS and XRD [111]. Interestingly, the encapsulation of the anticancer drug cisplatin within the metallacage cavity, lined with the nitrogen atom from the central pyridine of the ligand, was demonstrated by XRD studies, revealing that two molecules of the drug could be contained (Figure 6) [111]. The release of cisplatin was facilitated by the introduction of competing ligands (4-dimethylaminopyridine or Cl^-) to disassemble the cage, as shown by ¹H NMR and ESI-MS. Unfortunately, while the cisplatin-cage host-guest complex formed in acetonitrile and DMF, in more hydrogen bond competitive solvents (water and DMSO) no host-guest interaction was observed [116]. Additionally, the parent Pd(II) based cage decomposed rapidly in the presence of nucleophiles. In fact, the same group demonstrated that the stability of [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ cages when exposed to biological nucleophiles highly depends on the ligand structure: specifically, triazole-based ligands were found to lead to significantly more stable metallacages in comparison with pyridine-based scaffolds [57].

More recently, Casini and coworkers explored similar cationic [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ systems featuring bis(pyridyl) ligands - of general scaffold 3,5-bis(3-ethynylpyridine)phenyl) - and developed the exo-functionalization of the ligand to add different groups, including fluorescent tags facilitating the study of the cellular accumulation of these systems by fluorescence microscopy [117, 118]. Structural studies by ¹H NMR ad XRD were performed demonstrating encapsulation of cisplatin (Figure 6) [119]. Notably, most of the reported metallacages and their precursors were non-toxic in healthy rat liver tissue ex vivo, making them suitable for application as drug delivery systems [120]. Furthermore, the cytotoxicity of the [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ cages have been tested in vitro against a small panel of human cancer cells, showing scarce or moderate antiproliferative activities depending on the ligand scaffold [120]. More importantly, the activity of encapsulated cisplatin in the benzyl alcohol-exo-functionalized Pd(II) cage was evaluated against SKOV-3 ovarian cancer cells, showing a marked increase in cytotoxic potency (IC₅₀ = 1.9 ± 0.5 μM) compared to free cisplatin (IC₅₀ = 15.4 ± 2.2 μM) and the vacant cage complex (IC₅₀ = 11.6 ± 1.7 μM).[120] Interestingly, the aromatic and highly conjugated ligands confer the [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ cages fluorescence properties, which allowed to study their uptake in cancer cells by fluorescence microscopy.

Water solubility and stability under physiological conditions are both crucial for the biological application of SCCs. Unfortunately, [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ cages of this type are scarcely soluble in water, despite their positive charge. Thus, there are different strategies to introduce water-solubility to the SCCs. The most straight-forward approach is a simple anion exchange, since the SCCs usually are positively charged complexes. It was shown, that the hexafluorophosphate salts of the aforementioned organometallic pillarplex SOCs, which are soluble in organic solvents like acetonitrile or dimethylformamide, can be easily converted into the corresponding acetates, which are extremely well water-soluble (> 1g / mL water) [45]. In case an anion exchange is not applicable or not leading to the desired effect, covalent modifications at the linker molecules can be performed to introduce polar functional groups, e.g. sulfonates [121]. Another strategy to increase the hydrophilic character of these systems has been demonstrated via the introduction of water soluble moieties in their scaffold, including PEG [122].

 Figure 6 

A) Schematic representation and corresponding X-ray structure (CCDC n° 673229) of a [[Ru₂L']₃L₂]⁶⁺ cage encapsulating [Pt^II(acac)₂] (acac = acetylacetonato) [29]. B) Schematic representation and corresponding X-ray structure (CCDC n° 853227) of an exo-functionalised [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ metallacage encapsulating two equivalents of cisplatin [111]. C) Schematic representation and corresponding X-ray structure (CCDC n° 902397) of a [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ capsule encapsulating two equivalents of corannulene [112].

The control of the host-guest properties of the cavity defined by the SCC is another essential feature to implement them for drug encapsulation. For example, anthracene-based Pt(II)- and Pd(II)-linked coordination capsules provide a characteristic spherical cavity - with a diameter of ca. 1 nm and a volume of ca. 600 ų - contoured by polyaromatic frameworks (Figure 6) [112, 123], and that can accommodate various neutral molecules, through hydrophobic and π-stacking interactions, in aqueous solution [112, 123, 124]. Fluorescence microscopy studies allowed investigation of the intracellular accumulation of the capsules [124]. However, these systems, even without their guest molecules, manifest very pronounced cytotoxic effects, which make them unsuitable for drug delivery. Interestingly, the observed trends in the anticancer activity of the capsules and their host-guest complexes correlate with their different stabilities toward glutathione, estimated by NMR-based kinetic experiments [124]. The data suggest the glutathione-triggered disassembly of the capsular structures in cells as a potential activation pathway for their cytotoxic activity.

For supramolecular metallacages, such as [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺, with a molecular weight of ca. 2-3 kDa and diameter of ca. 10-15 Å, passive tumor targeting via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect is not likely to influence their delivery [125]. Furthermore, it should be mentioned that the success in preclinical in vivo studies of drug accumulation in tumors due to the EPR effect has so far not translated into success in clinical trials [126]. In this context, active tumor targeting mechanisms are crucial to achieve selectivity of metallacages for cancerous cells, for example via the conjugation of cancer-cell-specific ligands. However, this concept has been scarcely explored so far and few examples of bioconjugated cages are available in the literature. One study showed non-covalent peptide coating on self-assembled M₁₂L₂₄ coordination spheres [127], while encapsulation of a protein within a Pd₁₂L₁₄ cage has been achieved by appropriate endo-functionalization of the ligands [128]. Of note, the latter was the first example of encapsulation of a protein within synthetic host molecules which may unveil new strategies to deliver proteins at specific site and to control their function [128]. In this latter example, ligands were first tethered to the protein and then the cage was reconstituted via self-assembly upon addition of other ligands and metal precursors.

Within this framework, in 2017 Casini and coworkers reported on the first example of bioconjugation of self-assembled [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ cages via amide bond formation between the -COOH (or -NH₂) exo-functionalized ligand/cage and a complementary residue on a model linear peptide [129]. Certainly, other types of exo-functionalization, other than amide bond formation, for tethering metallacages to peptides or antibodies should be investigated, including click chemistry approaches [130]. Afterwards, in a proof-of-concept study, the same group reported on [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ cages conjugated via amide bond to four ligands selective for binding to integrins αvβ3 or α5β1 [131]. The conjugated cages were first studied for their integrin recognition properties using an ELISA assay, and were demonstrated to maintain high binding affinity and selectivity. Cage formation and encapsulation of cisplatin was proven by ¹H NMR, ¹H DOSY and ¹⁹⁵Pt NMR spectroscopy. Upon encapsulation, cisplatin showed increased cytotoxicity in vitro, in melanoma A375 cells overexpressing αvβ3 integrins, while it was not active against A549 human lung cancer cells, not expressing this specific integrin [131]. Moreover, ex vivo studies in tissue slices indicated reduced toxicity towards healthy liver and kidney tissues for cage-encapsulated cisplatin. The reason for such reduced toxicity is that the encapsulated drug is less accumulated in these organs compared to the 'free' one, as demonstrated by the analysis of metal content by ICP-MS [131]. It should be noted that anchoring of the peptide to the metallacages also allowed to substantially increase their solubility in aqueous environment. In general, it is worth mentioning that targeting supramolecular metal-based complexes to the desired site is essential to control off-target effects of the delivered chemotherapic agent, as well as to reduce the possible intrinsic systemic toxicity of the supramolecular metal-based drug delivery system.

4. In vivo activity of anticancer and diagnostic SCCs

Although the field of supramolecular coordination complexes as anticancer therapeutics is still in its infancy, a few preliminary in vivo experiments have been carried out. For example, the anticancer activity of two cytotoxic Ruthenium(II)-arene metallacycles, one with a 2D rectangular geometry and one featuring a metallabowl geometry (Figure 7A), was studied in vivo [70], using a hollow fiber assay, whereby a semipermeable fiber impregnated with the human colorectal carcinoma HCT-15 cells were implanted into the intraperitoneal and subcutaneous compartments of nude mice [70]. The two ruthenium-arene SCCs were then administered to the impregnated nude mice, and the animals were left for 7 days before the hollow fibers were removed and the tumors examined. The study revealed that the metallabowl-type metallacycle was a more potent inhibitor of cancer cells growth than the metallarectangle. However, both these ruthenium-arene scaffolds were not as effective inhibitors of cell proliferation as cisplatin in the hollow fibers located in the intraperitoneal and subcutaneous regions of the host mice [70]. The mechanism of induced cell death was investigated and the study revealed that both metallacycles induced autophagy in HCT-15 cells, and again the metallabowl was more potent than the metallarectangle, in line with the observed enhanced anticancer activity [70].

Concerning platinum(II) SCCs, in addition to the above mentioned Pt-PAZMB-b-POEGMA amphiphilic polymer by Stang and coworkers [60], a luminescent 2D Pt(II) metallacycle of rhomboidal geometry has also been studied in vitro and in vivo for its anticancer activity (Figure 7B) [132]. Of note, the compound remained intact upon cellular internalization and did not photobleach under the conditions of the confocal microscopy experiment. Preliminary in vitro studies against lung (A549) and cervical carcinoma (HeLa) cells confirmed rapid cellular uptake of the platinum metallacycle [132]. Afterwards, a mouse tumor xenograft model, generated using nude mice injected in the subcutaneous region with MDA-MB-231human breast cancer cells, was selected for the in vivo study. The tumors were allowed to reach a volume of 200 mm³ before drug administration. Mice were treated with a solution (300 μL) of Pt-metallacycle at a concentration of 0.6 mg/mL, administered via intraperitoneal injection every 3 days for 30 days. The study revealed that at the end of the treatment, a 64% median tumor volume reduction was observed in treated mice with respect to controls. Furthermore, the tumor growth inhibition, measured by the change in volume of the tumor throughout the length of the experiment and defined by the T/C ratio (in %, corresponds to the ratio between the Treatment (T) over the Control (C)),[133] was calculated as 36%, well below the National Cancer Institute standard (as the lower threshold for tumor inhibition of <42%)) [134].

Very recently, Chen, Stang and coworkers developed a sophisticated porphyrin-based metallacage through multicomponent coordination-driven self-assembly, acting as a theranostic platform to fabricate metal nanoparticles (MNPs) [135]. In details, a discrete platinum(II) metallacage was synthesized, using therapeutic cis-(PEt₃)₂Pt(OTf)₂ (cPt), 5,10,15,20-tetra(4-pyridyl)porphyrin (TPP) and disodium terephthalate (DSTP) as the building blocks, with the idea achieving synergistic anticancer efficacy (Figure 8). Of note, both the fluorescence emission and ¹O₂ generation quantum yield of the porphyrins were dramatically increased upon formation of MNPs, which was favorable for both NIRFI and PDT [135]. Furthermore, the nano-formulation was functionalized by two amphiphilic diblock polymers (mPEG-b-PEBP and RGD-PEG-b-PEBP). The resultant MNPs exhibited long blood circulation time and high tumor accumulation benefiting from the EPR effect and active targeting ability. Indeed, superior tumor suppression with respect to separate cisplatin treatment and light irradiation was realized without recurrence after single-dose injection of the targeted MNPs in xenograft models of tumors from αvβ3 integrin overexpressing U87MG cells and cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer A2780cisR cells [135]. Moreover, in order to verify the in vivo anti-tumor performance and anti-metastasis effect of photochemotherapy, 4T1 (breast cancer) tumors were orthotopically inoculated in the mammary fat pads to produce spontaneous metastases in the lung, which was an experimental animal model for stage IV human breast cancer.

 Figure 7 

Schematic representations of A) two arene-Ru(II) metallacycles (left: 2D rectangular geometry; right: 'metalla-bowl' geometry)[70] and of B) a rhomboidal Pt(II) metallacycle,[132] studied in vivo for their anticancer properties.

 Figure 8 

A) Schematic diagrams of the MNPs serving as a multifunctional theranostic platform. Structures of TPP, cPt, DSTP, M, mPEG-b-PEBP, and RGD-PEG- b-PEBP [135]. B) Ex vivo image of the main organs separated from U87MG tumor-bearing mice at 24 h post injection of MNPs. C) PET image of U87MG tumor-bearing nude mice at 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h post injection of ⁶⁴Cu@MNPs (150 μCi). The white circle denotes the tumor site. D) In vivo T₁-weighted axial MRI images (7T) of the mice pre-injection and after injection of Mn@MNPs. The white circle denotes the tumor site. (Adapted with permission from 'Nature Comm. 2018, 9, 4335-4335', licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Copyright 2018 Springer Nature Publishing AG.)

Notably, the combination of chemotherapy and PDT using the supramolecular MNPs exhibited superior anti-tumor efficacy with a 93.5% reduction in tumor volume, with respect to the least effective, and undergoing tumor recurrence during treatment, separate chemotherapic and PDT treatments [135]. Excellent anti-metastatic effect was also achieved, which was attributed to the synergistic photochemotherapy. In addition, by chelating a positron emitting metal ion (⁶⁴Cu) or a paramagnetic Mn ion, the ⁶⁴Cu@MNPs (or Mn@MNPs) were shown to be excellent PET imaging and MRI agents, allowing precise diagnosis of tumor and real-time monitoring of delivery, biodistribution and excretion of the MNPs (Figure 8) [135]. In fact, significant tumor accumulation was clearly visible in the U87MG tumor-bearing mice administered with MNPs at 6 h post injection, and exceptionally intensive signal was visible in the tumor area for more than 24 h in comparison with other tissues. Overall, these exciting preliminary in vivo studies highlight the potential of SCCs as anticancer agents and constitute the blueprint of next generation nanomedicines.

Finally, using a kinetically robust Co^III₄L₆ (L = tetrahedron), Lusby and Archibald and coworkers showed the feasibility of encapsulating the γ-emitting [^99mTc]TcO₄^- anion - the most widely used precursor in clinical nuclear diagnostic imaging - under conditions compatible with in vivo administration [136]. Subsequent single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of the caged-anion revealed a marked change in the biodistribution of the host-guest system compared to the thyroid-accumulating free oxo-anion (Figure 9). While this example still needs optimization, including targeting to disease tissues, the obtained results move clinical applications of (metallo)supramolecular species a step closer.

5. Summary and Future Perspectives

During the past decade, increasing interest has been manifested in the design and synthesis of discrete metallo-supramolecular architecture for biomedical applications. Certainly, the examples reported in this review show that SCCs can be designed to feature an inherent bioactivity, i.e. to act as a cytotoxic metallodrug itself. There are several possible ways to include bioactivity in SCCs, either by the metals (e.g. upon metal release / disassembly of the SCC / photoactivation) or by biological activity of the organic linker molecule. Also, the structural prerequisites and the outer shape of the SCCs can significantly determine their bioactivity as was shown for the metal helicates. The latter, due to their tetracationic charge and cylindric shape, can ideally interact with negatively charged biomolecules as DNA, and thanks to their intrinsic chirality, even recognize very selectively special structures like three-way junctions [137-143]. In addition, more complex architectures such as the interlocked metallacages reported by Clever et al. show a comparable interaction with DNA biomolecules [144]. Overall, these examples hold promise to achieve targeting by molecular design.

In this context, the exact determination of the bioactive species (speciation) is very important, since for the modular built SCCs all individual components (metal ions, organic linkers), as well as decomposition products, can be potential cause of the observed activity. Therefore, the fine-tuning of the complex stability by linker-design (e.g. by using different donor moieties for linkers) in combination with the use of different (biologically active) metals are promising parameters for selectively influencing the bioactivity.

 Figure 9 

A) Structure of anion-binding Co^III₄L₆ cages shown exemplarily at the X-ray structure of a tetrahedral SCC, featuring an encapsulated ReO₄^- (CCDC n° 1864366) [136]; B) Comparison of free [^99mTc]TcO₄^- uptake in naïve mice (left) vs SCC-encapsulated [^99mTc]TcO₄^- (right) monitored by SPECT imaging [136]. Encapsulation results in reduced thyroid and stomach uptake, and increased liver uptake. Images are maximum intensity coronal projections. S = Stomach, Th = Thyroid, L = Liver. (Adapted with permission from 'J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 16877-16881'. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.)

Indeed, when developing supramolecular metal-based complexes for biomedical applications one should control their stability in physiological media and in the presence of biologically relevant nucleophiles or reducing agents [57, 132]. In general, the use of first row transition metals with prominent kinetic lability with respect to ligand exchange reactions, is not ideal to achieve robust systems in solution. Therefore, late transition metals such as Ru(II), Pt(II) and Pd(II) should be preferred. However, we envisage that the use of organometallic scaffolds, as in the case of SOCs, may be further exploited to increase the stability in biological environment of the resulting supramolecular systems. This feature would also be advantageous to reduce possible side-effects in vivo, including systemic toxicity due to off-target effects and extensive metal speciation. Within this framework, water-soluble NHC-based SOCs like the pillarplexes hold promise for application as metallodrugs (NHC complex character), drug-delivery systems (porous character) and diagnostic handles (in-built functionality: e.g. luminescence). Furthermore, this unique combination of properties renders organometallic supramolecular systems as highly potential candidates to investigate towards theranostic applications.

In the previous sections, we have also emphasized the potential of 3D-metallacages as drug delivery systems for anticancer agents. In fact, cages have distinct advantages over conventional container molecules based on covalent bonds (e.g. nanotubes and polymeric nanoparticles), including the synthetic ease with which the coordination cages can be self-assembled, the availability of a large library of building blocks, and the possibility to design selective guest encapsulations. Despite these advantages, in order to develop the full potential of SCCs for biological applications, several issues need to be addressed. Firstly, the solubility of most 3D-SCCs in water or physiological media is generally low. The only example of fully water-soluble construct per se (i.e. without additional water-soluble functionalities anchored) is the family of ruthenium-based prisms obtained by face-directed self-assembly, which was exploited to encapsulate and solubilize hydrophobic guests [75, 110, 145, 146]. Regarding palladium(II)-based SCCs, the solubility of the final cages is often a real challenge, despite the multiple positive charges carried by the constituting metal ions. In rare examples where effort was put into varying the counter-ions and increasing the water solubility of the ligands by anchoring small water-soluble biomolecules, the final cages remained insoluble [147-149]. Instead, bioconjugation of [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ cages to targeting peptides made the systems well water soluble [131].

The study of the drug encapsulation and release properties in SCCs is a key step in the validation of these systems for drug delivery. Understanding the driving forces of the host-guest chemistry is also pivotal to the optimization of the cage scaffolds. Various factors are already known to play a role, including possible interactions of the guest molecule with the host cavity (e.g. H-bonding, van der Waals, coordination and electrostatic interactions) as well as energetically favorable solvent rearrangement during guest desolvation. Recently, the encapsulation of the anticancer drug cisplatin in selected [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ cages featuring 2,6-bis(pyridine-3-ylethynyl)pyridine ligands has been studied by NMR spectroscopy, and the obtained results show that if the solvent is of sufficient polarity, metallodrug encapsulation can easily occur in the hydrophobic cavity of the cage despite the absence of specific host-guest interactions [150]. Conversely, polar solvent molecules capable of forming hydrogen-bond networks (including water) are likely to prefer not to be encapsulated by hydrophobic cage cavities, and will not compete with the cisplatin molecules. This hypothesis is corroborated by previous studies on M₄L₆ metallacages for which guest encapsulation in polar protic solvents, such as water, appears to be driven by initial desolvation of the guest with concomitant rearrangement of the hydrogen bond networks in solution, more than by host-guest interactions alone [151].

Another strategy to consider when designing a drug delivery system is the controlled guest release of the drug at the intended target site, namely the tumor tissue. SCCs offer several options to achieve such controlled release, including competitive guest uptake [111, 152], light induced structural conformation change [153, 154], and redox mediated structural conformation changes [155, 156]. Although there are currently few examples of release mechanisms for therapeutic guest molecules, it can be envisioned that the pioneering proof-of-concept studies on the reversible control over the guest encapsulation event [157], as well as guest release studies on anionic, cationic and neutral guest molecules, will also be applicable to therapeutic payloads.

Finally, an intriguing aspect of SCCs is the possibility to design supramolecular tumor-targeted modalities that combine detection and treatment through the self-assembly of emissive, metal-based coordination complexes. In fact, most ligands used to form SCCs, especially by edge-directed self-assembly, are highly conjugated systems endowed with luminescence properties [158]. Moreover, additional modifications and functional groups including luminescent tags have been reported [159, 160]. However, in most cases, upon cage formation and coordination of the ligands to the metal ions, the so called “heavy metal effect” dramatically induces loss of luminescence of the final SCC [117], with some exceptions [161]. Modulation of the ligands and insertion of non-aromatic linkers allowed in some cases the maintenance of the luminescent properties of the attached fluorophore [159], but further studies are necessary to develop the full potential of SCCs as imaging tools in cells and tissues.

Certainly, the combination of SCCs with radioactive isotopes for diagnosis and therapy goes in this direction. Due to the huge combinatorial flexibility of SCC and SOCs towards the combination of ligands and metals, there are only few limitations of what the compounds in principle can be used for. The presented existing examples are limited to PET and MRI, but in the future also other techniques like X-ray CT might be interesting targets for SCC and SOC application. The SCC/SOCs could also combine existing tracers (like it was shown for technetates) and may enable orthogonal imaging using different techniques (e.g. guest for PET, host for MRI).

Overall, the initial examples mentioned above show that supramolecular metal-based complexes could be used to create self-formulating drugs. In fact, the self-assembly of therapeutic agents into well-defined supramolecular nanostructures is an emerging concept in both fields of molecular assembly and drug delivery to obtain one-component nanomedicines of high reproducibility.

Acknowledgements

A.C. acknowledges support from Cardiff University and the Hans Fischer Senior Fellowship of the Technical University of Munich - Institute for Advanced Study, funded by the German Excellence Initiative and the European Union Seventh Framework Program, under grant agreement n° 291763. A.P. thanks the Technical University of Munich for continuous support and the University of Birmingham - Institute for Advanced Studies for support within the frame of a Vanguard Fellowship.

Competing Interests

The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

References

1. James SL. Metal-organic frameworks. Chem Soc Rev. 2003;32:276-288

2. Zhou HC, Long JR, Yaghi OM. Introduction to metal-organic frameworks. Chem Rev. 2012;112:673-674

3. Cook TR, Zheng Y-R, Stang PJ. Metal-organic frameworks and self-assembled supramolecular coordination complexes: comparing and contrasting the design, synthesis, and functionality of metal-organic materials. Chem Rev. 2013;113:734-777

4. Chakrabarty R, Mukherjee PS, Stang PJ. Supramolecular coordination: self-assembly of finite two- and three-dimensional ensembles. Chem Rev. 2011;111:6810-6918

5. Cook TR, Stang PJ. Recent developments in the preparation and chemistry of metallacycles and metallacages via coordination. Chem Rev. 2015;115:7001-7045

6. Smulders MMJ, Riddell IA, Browne C, Nitschke JR. Building on architectural principles for three-dimensional metallosupramolecular construction. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:1728-1754

7. Han M, Engelhard DM, Clever GH. Self-assembled coordination cages based on banana-shaped ligands. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:1848-1860

8. Fujita M, Ogura K. Supramolecular self-assembly of macrocycles, catenanes, and cages through coordination of pyridine-based ligands to transition metals. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 1996;69:1471-1482

9. Seidel SR, Stang PJ. High-symmetry coordination cages via self-assembly. Acc Chem Res. 2002;35:972-983

10. Davis AV, Yeh RM, Raymond KN. Supramolecular assembly dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:4793-4796

11. Seeber G, Tiedemann BEF, Raymond KN. Supramolecular chirality in coordination chemistry. Topics in current chemistry. 2006;265:147-183

12. Brown CJ, Toste FD, Bergman RG, Raymond KN. Supramolecular catalysis in metal-ligand cluster hosts. Chem Rev. 2015;115:3012-3035

13. Pluth MD, Bergman RG, Raymond KN. Proton-mediated chemistry and catalysis in a self-assembled supramolecular host. Acc Chem Res. 2009;42:1650-1659

14. Zhang D, Ronson TK, Nitschke JR. Functional capsules via subcomponent self-assembly. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:2423-2436

15. Roberts DA, Pilgrim BS, Nitschke JR. Covalent post-assembly modification in metallosupramolecular chemistry. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47:626-644

16. Fujita D, Ueda Y, Sato S, Mizuno N, Kumasaka T, Fujita M. Self-assembly of tetravalent Goldberg polyhedra from 144 small components. Nature. 2016;540:563

17. Brown CJ, Toste FD, Bergman RG, Raymond KN. Supramolecular catalysis in metal-ligand cluster hosts. Chem Rev. 2015;115:3012-3035

18. Ahmad N, Younus HA, Chughtai AH, Verpoort F. Metal-organic molecular cages: applications of biochemical implications. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44:9-25

19. Kumar A, Sun S-S, Lees AJ. Directed assembly metallocyclic supramolecular systems for molecular recognition and chemical sensing. Coord Chem Rev. 2008;252:922-939

20. Cook TR, Vajpayee V, Lee MH, Stang PJ, Chi K-W. Biomedical and biochemical applications of self-assembled metallacycles and metallacages. Acc Chem Res. 2013;46:2464-2474

21. Frischmann PD, MacLachlan MJ. Metallocavitands: an emerging class of functional multimetallic host molecules. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42:871-890

22. Amouri H, Desmarets C, Moussa J. Confined nanospaces in metallocages: guest molecules, weakly encapsulated anions, and catalyst sequestration. Chem Rev. 2012;112:2015-2041

23. Hotze AC, Hodges NJ, Hayden RE, Sanchez-Cano C, Paines C, Male N. et al. Supramolecular iron cylinder with unprecedented DNA binding is a potent cytostatic and apoptotic agent without exhibiting genotoxicity. Chemistry & biology. 2008;15:1258-1267

24. Rota Martir D, Zysman-Colman E. Photoactive supramolecular cages incorporating Ru(ii) and Ir(iii) metal complexes. Chem Commun. 2019;55:139-158

25. Nagarajaprakash R, Ashok Kumar C, Mobin SM, Manimaran B. Multicomponent self-assembly of thiolato- and selenato-bridged ester-functionalized rhenium(I)-based trigonal metallaprisms: synthesis and structural characterization. Organometallics. 2015;34:724-730

26. Nagarajaprakash R, Divya D, Ramakrishna B, Manimaran B. Synthesis and spectroscopic and structural characterization of oxamidato-bridged rhenium(I) supramolecular rectangles with ester functionalization. Organometallics. 2014;33:1367-1373

27. Han Y-F, Jin G-X. Half-sandwich iridium- and rhodium-based organometallic architectures: rational design, synthesis, characterization, and applications. Acc Chem Res. 2014;47:3571-3579

28. Zava O, Mattsson J, Therrien B, Dyson PJ. Evidence for drug release from a metalla-cage delivery vector following cellular internalisation. Chemistry. 2010;16:1428-1431

29. Therrien B, Süss-Fink G, Govindaswamy P, Renfrew AK, Dyson PJ. The “complex-in-a-complex” cations [(acac)₂M⊂Ru₆(p-iPrC₆H₄Me)₆(tpt)₂(dhbq)₃]⁶⁺: A trojan horse for cancer cells. Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English). 2008;47:3773-3776

30. Ramsay WJ, Foster JA, Moore KL, Ronson TK, Mirgalet RJ, Jefferson DA. et al. Au(I)Cl-bound N-heterocyclic carbene ligands form M^II₄(LAuCl)₆ integrally gilded cages. Chem Sci. 2015;6:7326-7331

31. Cai X-M, Hoehne D, Koeberl M, Cokoja M, Poethig A, Herdtweck E. et al. Synthesis and characterization of dimolybdenum(II) complexes connected by carboxylate linkers. Organometallics. 2013;32:6004-6011

32. Sinha N, Hahn FE. Metallosupramolecular architectures obtained from poly-N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50:2167-2184

33. Gan M-M, Liu J-Q, Zhang L, Wang Y-Y, Hahn FE, Han Y-F. Preparation and post-assembly modification of metallosupramolecular assemblies from poly(N-heterocyclic carbene) Ligands. Chem Rev. 2018;118:9587-9641

34. Ryu JY, Lee JM, Park YJ, Nghia NV, Lee MH, Lee J. A ruthenium-iron bimetallic supramolecular cage with D4 symmetry from a tetrapyridyl iron(I) metalloligand. Organometallics. 2013;32:7272-7274

35. Boydston AJ, Bielawski CW. Bis(imidazolylidene)s as modular building blocks for monomeric and macromolecular organometallic materials. Dalton Trans. 2006:4073-4077

36. Poyatos M, Mata JA, Peris E. Complexes with poly(N-heterocyclic carbene) ligands: structural features and catalytic applications. Chem Rev. 2009;109:3677-3707

37. Hahn FE, Langenhahn V, Luegger T, Pape T, Le Van D. Template synthesis of a coordinated tetracarbene ligand with crown ether topology. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2005;44:3759-3763

38. Herrmann WA. N-heterocyclic carbenes: A new concept in organometallic catalysis. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2002;41:1290-1309

39. Jahnke MC, Hahn FE. Chemistry of N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. Top Organomet Chem. 2010;30:95-129

40. Diez-Gonzalez S. N-heterocyclic carbenes: from laboratory curiosities to efficient synthetic tools. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry. 2011

41. Hopkinson MN, Richter C, Schedler M, Glorius F. An overview of N-heterocyclic carbenes. Nature. 2014;510:485-496

42. Schaper L-A, Hock SJ, Herrmann WA, Kuehn FE. Synthesis and application of water-soluble NHC transition-metal complexes. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2013;52:270-289

43. Crabtree RH. NHC ligands versus cyclopentadienyls and phosphines as spectator ligands in organometallic catalysis. J Organomet Chem. 2005;690:5451-5457

44. Boehme C, Frenking G. N-heterocyclic carbene, silylene, and germylene complexes of MCl (M = Cu, Ag, Au). A theoretical study. Organometallics. 1998;17:5801-5809

45. Altmann PJ, Pöthig A. Pillarplexes: A metal-organic class of supramolecular hosts. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:13171-13174

46. Altmann Philipp J, Pöthig A. A pH-dependent, mechanically interlocked switch: organometallic [2]rotaxane vs. organic [3]rotaxane. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2017;56:15733-15736

47. Kascatan-Nebioglu A, Panzner MJ, Tessier CA, Cannon CL, Youngs WJ. N-heterocyclic carbene-silver complexes: A new class of antibiotics. Coord Chem Rev. 2007;251:884-895

48. Lazreg F, Cazin CSJ. Medical applications of NHC-Gold and -copper complexes. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. 2014:173-198

49. Baker MV, Barnard PJ, Berners-Price SJ, Brayshaw SK, Hickey JL, Skelton BW. et al. Synthesis and structural characterization of linear Au(I) N-heterocyclic carbene complexes: New analogues of the Au(I) phosphine drug Auranofin. J Organomet Chem. 2005;690:5625-5635

50. Schuh E, Pfluger C, Citta A, Folda A, Rigobello MP, Bindoli A. et al. Gold(I) carbene complexes causing Thioredoxin 1 and Thioredoxin 2 oxidation as potential anticancer agents. J Med Chem. 2012;55:5518-5528

51. Pöthig A, Ahmed S, Winther-Larsen HC, Guan S, Altmann PJ, Kudermann J. et al. Antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of Ag(I) and Au(I) pillarplexes. Front Chem. 2018;6:584

52. Holliday BJ, Mirkin CA. Strategies for the construction of supramolecular compounds through coordination chemistry. Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English). 2001;40:2022-2043

53. Wang X, Wang X, Guo Z. Functionalization of platinum complexes for biomedical applications. Acc Chem Res. 2015;48:2622-2631

54. Johnstone TC, Suntharalingam K, Lippard SJ. The next generation of platinum drugs: targeted Pt(II) agents, nanoparticle delivery, and Pt(IV) prodrugs. Chem Rev. 2016;116:3436-3486

55. Mishra A, Chang Lee S, Kaushik N, Cook TR, Choi EH, Kumar Kaushik N. et al. Self-assembled supramolecular hetero-bimetallacycles for anticancer potency by intracellular release. Chemistry. 2014;20:14410-14420

56. Zheng Y-R, Suntharalingam K, Bruno PM, Lin W, Wang W, Hemann MT. et al. Mechanistic studies of the anticancer activity of an octahedral hexanuclear Pt(II) cage. Inorganica Chim Acta. 2016;452:125-129

57. McNeill SM, Preston D, Lewis JEM, Robert A, Knerr-Rupp K, Graham DO. et al. Biologically active [Pd2L4]4+ quadruply-stranded helicates: stability and cytotoxicity. Dalton Trans. 2015;44:11129-11136

58. Yue Z, Wang H, Li Y, Qin Y, Xu L, Bowers DJ. et al. Coordination-driven self-assembly of a Pt(iv) prodrug-conjugated supramolecular hexagon. Chem Commun (Camb). 2018;54:731-734

59. Yu G, Zhang M, Saha ML, Mao Z, Chen J, Yao Y. et al. Antitumor activity of a unique polymer that incorporates a fluorescent self-assembled metallacycle. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:15940-15949

60. Zheng Y-R, Suntharalingam K, Johnstone TC, Lippard SJ. Encapsulation of Pt(iv) prodrugs within a Pt(ii) cage for drug delivery. Chem Sci. 2015;6:1189-1193

61. Yue Z, Wang H, Bowers DJ, Gao M, Stilgenbauer M, Nielsen F. et al. Nanoparticles of metal-organic cages designed to encapsulate platinum-based anticancer agents. Dalton Trans. 2018;47:670-674

62. Thota S, Rodrigues DA, Crans DC, Barreiro EJ. Ru(II) compounds: next-generation anticancer metallotherapeutics?. J Med Chem. 2018

63. Dubey A, Min JW, Koo HJ, Kim H, Cook TR, Kang SC. et al. Anticancer potency and multidrug-resistant studies of self-assembled arene-ruthenium metallarectangles. Chemistry. 2013;19:11622-11628

64. Vajpayee V, Yang YJ, Kang SC, Kim H, Kim IS, Wang M. et al. Hexanuclear self-assembled arene-ruthenium nano-prismatic cages: potential anticancer agents. Chem Commun. 2011;47:5184-5186

65. Vajpayee V, Song YH, Yang YJ, Kang SC, Cook TR, Kim DW. et al. Self-assembly of cationic, hetero- or homonuclear ruthenium(II) macrocyclic rectangles and their photophysical, electrochemical, and biological studies. Organometallics. 2011;30:6482-6489

66. Vajpayee V, Song YH, Jung YJ, Kang SC, Kim H, Kim IS. et al. Coordination-driven self-assembly of ruthenium-based molecular-rectangles: Synthesis, characterization, photo-physical and anticancer potency studies. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:3046-3052

67. Vajpayee V, Lee S, Kim S-H, Kang SC, Cook TR, Kim H. et al. Self-assembled metalla-rectangles bearing azodipyridyl ligands: synthesis, characterization and antitumor activity. Dalton Trans. 2013;42:466-475

68. Gupta G, Murray SB, Dyson JP, Therrien B. Synthesis, molecular structure and cytotoxicity of molecular materials based on water soluble half-sandwich Rh(III) and Ir(III) tetranuclear metalla-cycles. Materials (Basel). 2013:6

69. Mishra A, Jeong Yong J, Jo JH, Kang Se C, Lah Myoung S, Chi KW. Anticancer potency studies of coordination driven self-assembled arene-Ru-based metalla-bowls. Chembiochem. 2014;15:695-700

70. Dubey A, Jeong YJ, Jo JH, Woo S, Kim DH, Kim H. et al. Anticancer activity and autophagy involvement of self-assembled arene-ruthenium metallacycles. Organometallics. 2015;34:4507-4514

71. Kim I, Song YH, Singh N, Jeong YJ, Kwon JE, Kim H. et al. Anticancer activities of self-assembled molecular bowls containing a phenanthrene-based donor and Ru(II) acceptors. International journal of nanomedicine. 2015:10 Spec Iss: 143-153

72. Therrien B. Biologically relevant arene ruthenium metalla-assemblies. CrystEngComm. 2015;17:484-491

73. Therrien B. Discrete metalla-assemblies as drug delivery vectors. Nanomaterials in Drug Delivery, Imaging, and Tissue Engineering. 2013:145-166

74. Barry NPE, Zava O, Dyson PJ, Therrien B. Synthesis, characterization and anticancer activity of porphyrin-containing organometallic cubes. Aust J Chem. 2010;63:1529-1537

75. Therrien B. Drug delivery by water-soluble organometallic cages. Topics in current chemistry. 2012;319:35-55

76. Dubey A, Park DW, Kwon JE, Jeong YJ, Kim T, Kim I. et al. Investigation of the biological and anti-cancer properties of ellagic acid-encapsulated nano-sized metalla-cages. International journal of nanomedicine. 2015:10 Spec Iss: 227-240

77. Pitto-Barry A, Barry NPE, Zava O, Deschenaux R, Dyson PJ, Therrien B. Double targeting of tumours with pyrenyl-modified dendrimers encapsulated in an arene-ruthenium metallaprism. Chemistry. 2011;17:1966-1971

78. Hannon MJ, Painting CL, Jackson A, Hamblin J, Errington W. An inexpensive approach to supramolecular architecture. Chem Commun. 1997. 1807 -1808

79. Hasenknopf B, Lehn J-M, Boumediene N, Leize E, Van Dorsselaer A. Kinetic and thermodynamic control in self-assembly: Sequential formation of linear and circular helicates. Angewandte Chemie Int. ed. 1998;37:3265-3268

80. Piguet C, Bernardinelli G, Hopfgartner G. Helicates as versatile supramolecular complexes. Chem Rev. 1997;97:2005-2062

81. Moldrheim E, Hannon MJ, Meistermann I, Rodger A, Sletten E. Interaction between a DNA oligonucleotide and a dinuclear iron(II) supramolecular cylinder; an NMR and molecular dynamics study. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2002;7:770-780

82. Malina J, Hannon MJ, Brabec V. DNA binding of dinuclear iron(II) metallosupramolecular cylinders. DNA unwinding and sequence preference. Nucleic acids research. 2008;36:3630-3638

83. Malina J, Hannon Michael J, Brabec V. Recognition of DNA bulges by dinuclear iron(II) metallosupramolecular helicates. FEBS J. 2013;281:987-997

84. Malina J, Scott P, Brabec V. Recognition of DNA/RNA bulges by antimicrobial and antitumor metallohelices. Dalton Trans. 2015;44:14656-14665

85. Zhao A, Howson SE, Zhao C, Ren J, Scott P, Wang C. et al. Chiral metallohelices enantioselectively target hybrid human telomeric G-quadruplex DNA. Nucleic acids research. 2017;45:5026-5035

86. Hansel-Hertsch R, Di Antonio M, Balasubramanian S. DNA G-quadruplexes in the human genome: detection, functions and therapeutic potential. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2017;18:279-284

87. Cardo L, Hannon MJ. Design and DNA-binding of metallo-supramolecular cylinders conjugated to peptides. Inorganica Chim Acta. 2009;362:784-792

88. Ducani C, Leczkowska A, Hodges Nikolas J, Hannon Michael J. Noncovalent DNA-binding metallo-supramolecular cylinders prevent DNA transactions in vitro. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2010;49:8942-8945

89. Boer DR, Kerckhoffs Jessica MCA, Parajo Y, Pascu M, Usón I, Lincoln P. et al. Self-assembly of functionalizable two-component 3D DNA arrays through the induced formation of DNA three-way-junction branch points by supramolecular cylinders. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2010;49:2336-2339

90. Faulkner AD, Kaner RA, Abdallah QMA, Clarkson G, Fox DJ, Gurnani P. et al. Asymmetric triplex metallohelices with high and selective activity against cancer cells. Nat Chem. 2014;6:797

91. Brabec V, Howson SE, Kaner RA, Lord RM, Malina J, Phillips RM. et al. Metallohelices with activity against cisplatin-resistant cancer cells; does the mechanism involve DNA binding?. Chem Sci. 2013;4:4407-4416

92. Kieltyka R, Englebienne P, Fakhoury J, Autexier C, Moitessier N, Sleiman HF. A Platinum supramolecular square as an effective G-quadruplex binder and telomerase inhibitor. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:10040-10041

93. Barry NPE, Zava O, Furrer J, Dyson PJ, Therrien B. Anticancer activity of opened arene ruthenium metalla-assemblies. Dalton Trans. 2010;39:5272-5277

94. Terenzi A, Ducani C, Blanco V, Zerzankova L, Westendorf Aron F, Peinador C. et al. DNA binding studies and cytotoxicity of a dinuclear PtII diazapyrenium-based metallo-supramolecular rectangular box. Chemistry. 2012;18:10983-10990

95. Domarco O, Lotsch D, Schreiber J, Dinhof C, Van Schoonhoven S, Garcia MD. et al. Self-assembled Pt2L2 boxes strongly bind G-quadruplex DNA and influence gene expression in cancer cells. Dalton Trans. 2017;46:329-332

96. van Straten D, Mashayekhi V, de Bruijn HS, Oliveira S, Robinson DJ. Oncologic photodynamic therapy: basic principles, current clinical status and future directions. Cancers (Basel). 2017:9

97. Schmitt F, Govindaswamy P, Zava O, Süss-Fink G, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Therrien B. Combined arene ruthenium porphyrins as chemotherapeutics and photosensitizers for cancer therapy. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2009;14:101-109

98. Gaschard M, Nehzat F, Cheminel T, Therrien B. Arene ruthenium metalla-assemblies with anthracene moieties for PDT applications. Inorganics (Basel). 2018:6

99. Rousseau T, Cravino A, Bura T, Ulrich G, Ziessel R, Roncali J. BODIPY derivatives as donor materials for bulk heterojunction solar cells. Chem Commun. 2009:1673-1675

100. Weissleder R. A clearer vision for in vivo imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19:316

101. Kamkaew A, Lim SH, Lee HB, Kiew LV, Chung LY, Burgess KY. BODIPY dyes in photodynamic therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2013:77

102. Kaloudi-Chantzea A, Karakostas N, Raptopoulou CP, Psycharis V, Saridakis E, Griebel J. et al. Coordination-driven self assembly of a brilliantly fluorescent rhomboid cavitand composed of BODIPY-dye subunits. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:16327-16329

103. Gupta G, Das A, Park KC, Tron A, Kim H, Mun J. et al. Self-assembled novel BODIPY-based palladium supramolecules and their cellular localization. Inorg Chem. 2017;56:4615-4621

104. Neelakandan PP, Jiménez A, Nitschke JR. Fluorophore incorporation allows nanomolar guest sensing and white-light emission in M4L6 cage complexes. Chem Sci. 2014;5:908-915

105. Gupta G, Das A, Ghate NB, Kim T, Ryu JY, Lee J. et al. Novel BODIPY-based Ru(ii) and Ir(iii) metalla-rectangles: cellular localization of compounds and their antiproliferative activities. Chem Commun. 2016;52:4274-4277

106. Zhou J, Zhang Y, Yu G, Crawley MR, Fulong CRP, Friedman AE. et al. Highly emissive self-assembled BODIPY-platinum supramolecular triangles. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140:7730-7736

107. Brand W, Noorlander CW, Giannakou C, De Jong WH, Kooi MW, Park MV. et al. Nanomedicinal products: a survey on specific toxicity and side effects. International journal of nanomedicine. 2017;12:6107-6129

108. Casini A, Woods B, Wenzel M. The promise of self-assembled 3D supramolecular coordination complexes for biomedical applications. Inorg Chem. 2017;56:14715-14729

109. Yan H, Suss-Fink G, Neels A, Stoeckli-Evans H. Mono-, di- and tetra-nuclear p-cymeneruthenium complexes containing oxalato ligands. Dalton Trans. 1997:4345-4350

110. Mattsson J, Zava O, Renfrew AK, Sei Y, Yamaguchi K, Dyson PJ. et al. Drug delivery of lipophilic pyrenyl derivatives by encapsulation in a water soluble metalla-cage. Dalton Trans. 2010;39:8248-8255

111. Lewis JEM, Gavey EL, Cameron SA, Crowley JD. Stimuli-responsive Pd2L4 metallosupramolecular cages: towards targeted cisplatin drug delivery. Chem Sci. 2012;3:778-784

112. Kishi N, Li Z, Sei Y, Akita M, Yoza K, Siegel Jay S. et al. Wide-ranging host capability of a PdII-linked M2L4 molecular capsule with an anthracene shell. Chemistry. 2013;19:6313-6320

113. Barry NPE, Zava O, Dyson PJ, Therrien B. Excellent correlation between drug release and portal size in metalla-cage drug-delivery systems. Chemistry. 2011;17:9669-9677

114. Zhao D, Tan S, Yuan D, Lu W, Rezenom Yohannes H, Jiang H. et al. Surface functionalization of porous coordination nanocages via click chemistry and their application in drug delivery. Adv Mater. 2010;23:90-93

115. Chand DK, Biradha K, Fujita M. Self-assembly of a novel macrotricyclic Pd metallocage encapsulating a nitrate ion. Chem Commun (Camb). 2001:1652-1653

116. Preston D, Fox-Charles A, Lo WK, Crowley JD. Chloride triggered reversible switching from a metallosupramolecular [Pd2L4](4+) cage to a [Pd2L2Cl4] metallo-macrocycle with release of endo- and exo-hedrally bound guests. Chem Commun (Camb). 2015;51:9042-9045

117. Schmidt A, Hollering M, Drees M, Casini A, Kuhn FE. Supramolecular exo-functionalized palladium cages: fluorescent properties and biological activity. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:8556-8565

118. Schmidt A, Hollering M, Han J, Casini A, Kuhn FE. Self-assembly of highly luminescent heteronuclear coordination cages. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:12297-12300

119. Kaiser F, Schmidt A, Heydenreuter W, Altmann PJ, Casini A, Sieber SA. et al. Self-assembled palladium and platinum coordination cages: Photophysical studies and anticancer activity. Eur J Inorg Chem. 2016 n/a-n/a

120. Schmidt A, Molano V, Hollering M, Pöthig A, Casini A, Kühn FE. Evaluation of new palladium cages as potential delivery systems for the anticancer drug cisplatin. Chemistry. 2016;22:2253-2256

121. Sun Y, Yao Y, Wang H, Fu W, Chen C, Saha ML. et al. Self-assembly of metallacages into multidimensional suprastructures with tunable emissions. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140:12819-12828

122. Li H, Luo J, Liu T. Modification of the solution behavior of Pd12L24 metal-organic nanocages via PEGylation. Chemistry. 2016;22:17949-17952

123. Ahmedova A, Momekova D, Yamashina M, Shestakova P, Momekov G, Akita M. et al. Anticancer potencies of PtII- and PdII-linked M2L4 coordination capsules with improved selectivity. Chem Asian J. 2015;11:474-477

124. Ahmedova A, Mihaylova R, Momekova D, Shestakova P, Stoykova S, Zaharieva J. et al. M2L4 coordination capsules with tunable anticancer activity upon guest encapsulation. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:13214-13221

125. Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T, Matsumura Y, Hori K. Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J Control Release. 2000;65:271-284

126. Danhier F. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Since the EPR effect fails in the clinic, what is the future of nanomedicine?. J Control Release. 2016;244:108-121

127. Ikemi M, Kikuchi T, Matsumura S, Shiba K, Sato S, Fujita M. Peptide-coated, self-assembled M12L24 coordination spheres and their immobilization onto an inorganic surface. Chem Sci. 2010;1:68-71

128. Fujita D, Suzuki K, Sato S, Yagi-Utsumi M, Yamaguchi Y, Mizuno N. et al. Protein encapsulation within synthetic molecular hosts. Nature communications. 2012;3:1093

129. Han J, Schmidt A, Zhang T, Permentier H, Groothuis GMM, Bischoff R. et al. Bioconjugation strategies to couple supramolecular exo-functionalized palladium cages to peptides for biomedical applications. Chem Commun. 2017;53:1405-1408

130. Vasdev RAS, Preston D, Crowley JD. Functional metallosupramolecular architectures using 1,2,3-triazole ligands: it's as easy as 1,2,3 “click”. Dalton Trans. 2017;46:2402-2414

131. Han J, Räder AFB, Reichart F, Aikman B, Wenzel MN, Woods B. et al. Bioconjugation of supramolecular metallacages to integrin ligands for targeted delivery of cisplatin. Bioconjug Chem. 2018;29:3856-3865

132. Grishagin IV, Pollock JB, Kushal S, Cook TR, Stang PJ, Olenyuk BZ. In vivo anticancer activity of rhomboidal Pt(II) metallacycles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:18448-18453

133. Wu J. Statistical inference for tumor growth inhibition T/C ratio. J Biopharm Stat. 2010;20:954-964

134. Bissery MC, Chabot GG. History and new development of screening and evaluation methods of anticancer drugs used in vivo and in vitro. Bulletin du cancer. 1991;78:587-602

135. Yu G, Yu S, Saha ML, Zhou J, Cook TR, Yung BC. et al. A discrete organoplatinum(II) metallacage as a multimodality theranostic platform for cancer photochemotherapy. Nature communications. 2018;9:4335-4335

136. Burke BP, Grantham W, Burke MJ, Nichol GS, Roberts D, Renard I. et al. Visualizing kinetically robust CoIII4L6 assemblies in vivo: SPECT imaging of the encapsulated [99mTc]TcO4- anion. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140:16877-16881

137. Ducani C, Leczkowska A, Hodges NJ, Hannon MJ. Noncovalent DNA-binding metallo-supramolecular cylinders prevent DNA transactions in vitro. Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English). 2010;49:8942-8945 S8942/8941-S8942/8945

138. Hannon MJ. Supramolecular DNA recognition. Chem Soc Rev. 2007;36:280-295

139. Malina J, Hannon MJ, Brabec V. Iron(II) supramolecular helicates interfere with the HIV-1 Tat-TAR RNA interaction critical for viral replication. Sci Rep. 2016;6:29674

140. Meistermann I, Moreno V, Prieto MJ, Moldrheim E, Sletten E, Khalid S. et al. Intramolecular DNA coiling mediated by metallo-supramolecular cylinders: differential binding of P and M helical enantiomers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:5069-5074

141. Oleksi A, Blanco AG, Boer R, Uson I, Aymami J, Rodger A. et al. Molecular recognition of a three-way DNA junction by a metallosupramolecular helicate. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2006;45:1227-1231

142. Pascu GI, Hotze ACG, Sanchez-Cano C, Kariuki BM, Hannon MJ. Dinuclear ruthenium(II) triple-stranded helicates: luminescent supramolecular cylinders that bind and coil DNA and exhibit activity against cancer cell lines. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2007;46:4374-4378

143. Phongtongpasuk S, Paulus S, Schnabl J, Sigel RKO, Spingler B, Hannon MJ. et al. Binding of a designed anti-cancer drug to the central cavity of an RNA three-way junction. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2013;52:11513-11516

144. Zhu R, Regeni I, Holstein JJ, Dittrich B, Simon M, Prevost S. et al. Catenation and aggregation of multi-cavity coordination cages. Angewandte Chemie (International ed in English). 2018;57:13652-13656

145. Barry NPE, Zava O, Wu W, Zhao J, Therrien B. Encapsulation of hydrophobic pyrenylcycloplatinate complexes within a water-soluble arene ruthenium metallacage. Inorg Chem Commun. 2012;18:25-28

146. Furrer MA, Schmitt F, Wiederkehr M, Juillerat-Jeanneret L, Therrien B. Cellular delivery of pyrenyl-arene ruthenium complexes by a water-soluble arene ruthenium metalla-cage. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:7201-7211

147. Lewis JEM, Elliott ABS, McAdam CJ, Gordon KC, Crowley JD. 'Click' to functionalise: synthesis, characterisation and enhancement of the physical properties of a series of exo- and endo-functionalised Pd₂L₄ nanocages. Chem Sci. 2014;5:1833-1843

148. Preston D, White KF, Lewis JEM, Vasdev RAS, Abrahams BF, Crowley JD. Solid-state gas adsorption studies with discrete Palladium(II) [Pd2(L)4]4+ cages. Chemistry. 2017;23:10559-10567

149. Lewis JEM, Crowley JD. Exo- and endo-hedral interactions of counteranions with tetracationic Pd2L4 metallosupramolecular architectures. Supramol Chem. 2014;26:173-181

150. Woods B, Wenzel MN, Williams T, Thomas SR, Jenkins RL, Casini A. Exo-functionalized metallacages as host-guest systems for the anticancer drug cisplatin. Front Chem. 2019;7:68

151. Leung DH, Bergman RG, Raymond KN. Enthalpy-entropy compensation reveals solvent reorganization as a driving force for supramolecular encapsulation in water. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:2798-2805

152. Löffler S, Lübben J, Krause L, Stalke D, Dittrich B, Clever GH. Triggered exchange of anionic for neutral guests inside a cationic coordination cage. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:1060-1063

153. Han M, Luo Y, Damaschke B, Gómez L, Ribas X, Jose A. et al. Light-controlled interconversion between a self-assembled triangle and a rhombicuboctahedral sphere. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2015;55:445-449

154. Han M, Michel R, He B, Chen Y-S, Stalke D, John M. et al. Light-triggered guest uptake and release by a photochromic coordination cage. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2012;52:1319-1323

155. Frank M, Hey J, Balcioglu I, Chen Y-S, Stalke D, Suenobu T. et al. Assembly and stepwise oxidation of interpenetrated coordination cages based on phenothiazine. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2013;52:10102-10106

156. Croué V, Goeb S, Szalóki G, Allain M, Sallé M. Reversible guest uptake/release by redox-controlled assembly/disassembly of a coordination cage. Angewandte Chemie Int. Ed. 2015;55:1746-1750

157. Kim TY, Vasdev RAS, Preston D, Crowley JD. Strategies for reversible guest uptake and release from metallosupramolecular architectures. Chemistry. 2018;24:14878-14890

158. Pollock JB, Schneider GL, Cook TR, Davies AS, Stang PJ. Tunable visible light emission of self-assembled rhomboidal metallacycles. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:13676-13679

159. Elliott ABS, Lewis JEM, van der Salm H, McAdam CJ, Crowley JD, Gordon KC. Luminescent cages: pendant emissive units on [Pd₂L₄]⁴⁺ “click” cages. Inorg Chem. 2016;55:3440-3447

160. Li Z, Kishi N, Hasegawa K, Akita M, Yoshizawa M. Highly fluorescent M2L4 molecular capsules with anthracene shells. Chem Commun. 2011;47:8605-8607

161. Yan X, Cook TR, Wang P, Huang F, Stang PJ. Highly emissive platinum(II) metallacages. Nat Chem. 2015;7:342-348

Author contact

Corresponding author: E-mail: casiniaac.uk

Received 2018-11-27
Accepted 2019-4-11
Published 2019-5-18

Citation styles

©2024 Ivyspring International Publisher. Terms of use